
#5SG · Utah Jazz
Height
6'8"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
21
College
Colorado
Experience
1 yrs
Wingspan
7'1.0"
Reach
8'7.0"
Hand Size
8.25" × 9"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 107 | 7.4 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 48.4% | 25.4% | 70.7% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 57 | 7.4 | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | @ LAL | L 107-131 | 39 | 14 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5-15 | 0-2 | -10 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs MEM | W 147-101 | 34 | 14 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$19.4M
Guaranteed
$11.8M
AAV
$5.7M/yr
The Utah Jazz's investment in Cody Williams at $5.7M AAV represents a concerning allocation of resources that earns a D grade on the Contract Value Index (CVI). Williams' D+ performance grade reflects replacement-level production that falls well short of justifying his annual salary, particularly troubling for a shooting guard position where the Jazz need reliable offensive output. At nearly $6 million per year, the organization is paying above-average starter money for a player currently delivering below-average results across key metrics including shooting efficiency, defensive impact, and overall court presence. The three-year commitment compounds the concern, as Williams would need dramatic improvement to provide positive value against this contract structure. While young players can develop, the current gap between his $5.7M salary and replacement-level performance creates significant negative value for Utah's roster construction. This represents the type of contract that hampers team flexibility and prevents organizations from maximizing their salary cap efficiency in a competitive Western Conference.
Cody Williams earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA shooting guards this season. Through 107 games, Cody is contributing 7.4 points, 2.8 rebounds, and 1.5 assists per game in his role. Cody's strongest area is FG% at 48.4, which compares favorably to the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.5 (shooting guard median: 4.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Cody ranks 104th. At 21, Cody is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Utah Jazz.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.7 |
| 0.4 |
| 48.4% |
| 24.8% |
| 69.7% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 50 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 32.3% | 25.9% | 72.5% |
| 3 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 6-16 |
| 2-6 |
| +37 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ NOP | L 137-156 | 34 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8-17 | 0-5 | -20 |
| Sat, 4/4 | @ HOU | L 106-140 | 38 | 27 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10-16 | 0-2 | -29 |
Public sentiment around Cody Williams has cooled measurably over the last 14 days, settling at a C+ after a more favorable stretch earlier in the season — a modest grade that accurately reflects where the narrative sits for a 21-year-old second-year player still very much in the developmental phase. The most significant positive force propping up that sentiment is the openly communicated organizational belief in Williams, with head coach Will Hardy publicly citing tangible growth from the young wing — that kind of internal endorsement going external is a meaningful signal, even if it hasn't yet translated into the kind of production that moves the needle on a broader scale. The disconnect between public goodwill and on-court output is real: Williams is posting 7.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, and 1.5 APG across 57 games in the 2025-26 season, numbers that land firmly in the below-average tier for a rotation player and align directly with his D+ performance grade — the sentiment grade is essentially running on the credit of perceived upside rather than demonstrated results. The Jazz's recent transaction activity — a flurry of short-term, rest-of-season and 10-day signings at the guard position — paints a picture of a franchise managing its way through a 22-60 season while keeping its options open, and that organizational backdrop doesn't create much lift for individual player narratives. With Utah out of the playoff picture entirely and the broader media framing Williams as a long-term developmental asset rather than an immediate contributor, the honest read is that his C+ sentiment grade is being sustained almost entirely by low expectations and genuine organizational patience — durable enough for now, but contingent on showing measurable growth before next season's perception window opens.