
#32C · Sacramento Kings
Height
6'10"
Weight
255 lbs
Age
24
College
Auburn
Experience
0 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 44 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 58.7% | 50.0% | 51.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 44 | 5.4 | 7.5 | 1.4 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | @ POR | L 110-122 | 21 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-1 | -12 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs GSW | W 124-118 | 24 | 7 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$3.0M
Guaranteed
$3.0M
AAV
$755K/yr
Dylan Cardwell's 4-year, $0.8M AAV deal with the Sacramento Kings represents exceptional value in today's inflated NBA market, earning an A- Contract Value Index (CVI) grade despite his C performance rating. While Cardwell projects as a solid starter-level center, the Kings secured his services at what amounts to minimum wage territory — a fraction of what even middling big men typically command in free agency. The $3.2M total commitment carries virtually zero financial risk for Sacramento, allowing them to develop a promising young center without hampering their salary cap flexibility. Even if Cardwell plateaus at his current production level, the Kings are paying roughly 15-20% of market rate for a rotation-caliber big man who can contribute immediately. This type of cost-controlled talent acquisition is exactly how teams build sustainable rosters around their star players, making Cardwell's contract one of the more astute signings in recent memory from a pure value perspective.
Dylan Cardwell earns a C Performance grade — solid for a rookie, with room to grow into a larger role. Through 44 games, Dylan is contributing 5.4 points, 7.5 rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game in his role. Dylan's strongest area is RPG at 7.5, which compares favorably to the center median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.4 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Dylan ranks 54th. At 24, Dylan is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Sacramento Kings.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.7 |
| 1.5 |
| 58.7% |
| 50.0% |
| 51.0% |
| 7 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 3-6 |
| 1-1 |
| +3 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ GSW | L 105-110 | 26 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | +1 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs NOP | W 117-113 | 24 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | +4 |
Dylan Cardwell's public perception sits at a C- right now, which tells an interesting story in itself — the narrative around him is more complicated than a straightforward dismissal. The media framing heading into this season was genuinely optimistic: analytically inclined outlets were calling him one of the NBA's most unique role players, and the Kings' front office drew a Hall of Fame comparison that generated real buzz both locally and nationally, the kind of organizational endorsement that rarely gets attached to fringe roster pieces. His on-court production in 2025-26 has been modest — 5.4 points and 7.5 rebounds per game across 44 games — which aligns with a C performance grade and reflects the reality that he's a role player whose value doesn't always show up in counting stats, even if his efficiency and shot-blocking profile have impressed the analytics crowd. The disconnect between that pre-season optimism and his current C- sentiment grade likely traces to the broader Sacramento context: a team sitting at 22-60 as the 14th seed in the Western Conference, with multiple late-season signings that read more like roster-filling than a coherent plan, doesn't provide fertile ground for any individual to build a rising narrative. When a franchise is cycling through signings and posting one of the league's worst records with the regular season winding down, even a legitimately intriguing developmental piece gets caught in the undertow of institutional frustration. Cardwell's story isn't one of a player who has damaged his reputation — the Hall of Fame comparison and analytical admiration are still part of the conversation — but sentiment has cooled considerably alongside a Kings organization whose trajectory makes it hard for any positive development story to gain traction right now.