
#12C · Chicago Bulls
Height
6'9"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
28
College
Gonzaga
Experience
8 yrs
Wingspan
7'1.0"
Reach
9'3.0"
Hand Size
8.75" × 9.25"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 388 | 9.7 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 57.8% | 33.4% | 76.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 10 | 9.7 | 5.6 | 1.5 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$18.1M
Guaranteed
$18.1M
AAV
$18.1M/yr
Zach Collins' one-year, $18.1M deal with the Chicago Bulls represents a classic case of paying premium money for inconsistent production, earning a D- Contract Value Index (CVI) grade that reflects significant overpayment. The veteran center's C- performance grade simply doesn't justify an $18.1M annual commitment, particularly when considering his injury history and limited impact on winning basketball. Collins falls into the middling tier of NBA centers, yet his contract places him among franchise-caliber compensation levels — a disconnect that creates immediate negative value for Chicago's salary structure. The Bulls essentially gambled $18.1M on upside that Collins has rarely demonstrated consistently throughout his career, making this a high-risk investment with minimal downside protection. While the short-term nature of the deal provides some flexibility, the opportunity cost of tying up significant cap space on a replacement-level contributor severely hampers Chicago's ability to address more pressing roster needs. This contract exemplifies how teams can price themselves out of competitive windows by overvaluing marginal talent, leaving the Bulls with limited financial maneuverability and questionable return on investment.
Zach Collins earns a C- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 388 games, Zach is contributing 9.7 points, 5.6 rebounds, and 1.5 assists per game in his role. Zach's strongest area is FG% at 57.8, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.5 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Zach ranks 63rd.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.2 |
| 0.4 |
| 57.8% |
| 42.9% |
| 70.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 64 | 6.4 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 50.7% | 30.2% | 88.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 69 | 11.2 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 48.4% | 32.0% | 75.3% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 63 | 11.6 | 6.4 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 51.8% | 37.4% | 76.1% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 28 | 7.8 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 49.0% | 34.1% | 80.0% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 11 | 7.0 | 6.3 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 47.1% | 36.8% | 75.0% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 16 | 6.8 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 50.6% | 33.3% | 80.0% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 4 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 36.7% | 21.4% | 75.0% |
Fan and media sentiment around Zach Collins has cratered to one of the lowest points of his career, and the D+ grade reflects a narrative almost entirely defined by absence rather than production. The dominant storyline heading into 2025-26 has been his season-ending toe surgery, with coverage tracking a cascading series of injuries rather than anything happening between the lines — durability, not talent, has become the defining lens through which Chicago's fanbase views him. That disconnect is especially frustrating because when Collins has been available, the underlying profile remains legitimate: in the 2025-26 season across just 10 games, he posted 9.7 PPG and 5.6 RPG, flashing the stretch-center two-way value that made his $18.1M AAV contract feel defensible in the first place, and his C- performance grade reflects a player whose floor is undermined almost entirely by availability rather than ability. Meanwhile, the Bulls' own transactions tell the story of a franchise pivoting around his absence — acquiring Rob Dillingham and Leonard Miller via trade, releasing Jaden Ivey, and cycling in rest-of-season depth signings, all moves that signal a front office managing around uncertainty rather than building around Collins as a cornerstone. Sitting at 31-51 and locked into the #12 seed in the East with the season effectively over, there is no competitive context left to rehabilitate his perception this year, which means the narrative will carry its full weight into the offseason. The one faint signal of recovery is that sentiment has actually ticked up from an F to a D+ over the past 30 days — likely driven by his brief return to the floor — but make no mistake, Collins enters the summer as a high-upside reclamation story whose standing in Chicago will hinge entirely on whether he can string together a meaningful run of healthy games next season.