
#0 CF · Rangers
Height
5'11"
Weight
175 lbs
Age
32
College
New Mexico
Draft
2015, Rd 24, #724
Experience
7 yrs
Bats/Throws
B/R
Grade Sam Haggerty
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Sam Haggerty grades out as a strong CF for Rangers (B+ Performance). That places him 7th of 70 graded center fielders. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C-), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | ![]() | 36 | .159 | 0 | 1 | .395 | 2 | 7 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
Guaranteed
$750K
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Plate appearances and per-game impact line up to a B+ performance grade for Sam Haggerty. For an established veteran entering his eighth season at age 32, that grade reflects solid depth-piece production in a utility role — the kind of floor-raiser who provides competitive at-bats without carrying offensive load expectations. His 2026 season stats tell a sobering story, though: a .159 average across 36 games with zero home runs and 16 strikeouts paint the picture of a player in a prolonged slump at the plate, a far cry from the power potential the media has flagged as his calling card. The durability narrative that has haunted his public standing finds real validation here — repeated IL stints and early-season activation cycles have fragmented his availability, limiting the consistency required to string together meaningful production stretches. What makes the B+ grade instructive is that it reflects per-game impact when he does appear, not season-long value; the Rangers' recent outfield acquisitions and roster churn signal they are actively managing depth options and do not view Haggerty as a solution to their middle-of-the-pack positioning at 38-40 with 96 days left in the regular season. For a 24th-round draft pick who has built a seven-year career on athleticism and versatility, maintaining a solid single-game performance tier is respectable, but the gap between his recent on-field production and organizational confidence has widened into something untenable — sentiment has cooled to D-, and the market has clearly voted on his role.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Sam's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Sam Haggerty ranks 7th of 70 graded center fielders by performance. That slots Sam between Jose Siri (A) just ahead and Zach Cole (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Jose SiriAngelsAJackson ChourioBrewersAPete Crow-armstrongCubsB+Graded lower
Zach ColeAstrosAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Sam Haggerty is a player in his 7th MLB season listed at CF for the Rangers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Sam Haggerty, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance B+, Sentiment F.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 64 |
| .253 |
| 2 |
| 13 |
| .698 |
| 12 |
| 41 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 8 | .067 | 0 | 1 | .192 | 1 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 52 | .253 | 1 | 5 | .705 | 10 | 23 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 83 | .256 | 5 | 23 | .738 | 13 | 45 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 35 | .186 | 2 | 5 | .538 | 5 | 16 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 13 | .260 | 1 | 6 | .715 | 4 | 13 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 11 | .000 | 0 | — | .000 | 0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.