
#6 CF · Astros
Height
6'0"
Weight
200 lbs
Age
30
College
Nebraska
Draft
2017, Rd 13, #391
Experience
5 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/L
Grade Jake Meyers
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jake Meyers grades out as a middling CF for Astros (C Performance). That places him 43rd of 70 graded center fielders. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 494 | 0.24248497 | 35 | 169 | 0.6748092 | 38 | 363 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 30 | .220 | 2 | 8 | .610 | 1 | 20 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$3.5M
Guaranteed
$2.1M
AAV
$3.5M/yr
Jake Meyers' WAR-tier baseline and counting stats together earn a C performance grade. The 30-year-old center fielder, a sixth-year big-league veteran, projects as a solid-starter option when on the field—the kind of depth piece who can anchor an outfield rotation without carrying star-power expectations. His 2026 season numbers tell a cautionary tale: across 30 games, he's posted a .220 average with just 2 home runs and 21 strikeouts, a profile that screams contact issues and limited thump. The real problem isn't the counting stats themselves—it's the durability wrapped around them. Meyers exited early with a back injury and was promptly shelved on the IL, the latest in what media framing characterizes as a recurring durability concern that's beginning to redefine his value proposition from reliable contributor to fragile question mark. At $3.5M, he carries modest financial weight, but his absence has become tangible damage to an already injury-ravaged Astros roster—one that's now at the bottom of the AL West and cycling through emergency signings just to patch depth holes. Until Meyers proves he can log consistent innings without another trip to the IL, his on-field ceiling remains solid-starter floor, not upside.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jake's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jake Meyers ranks 43rd of 70 graded center fielders by performance. That slots Jake between Everson Pereira (C) just ahead and Jung Hoo Lee (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Everson PereiraWhite SoxCPetey HalpinGuardiansCLuis Robert Jr.MetsCGraded lower
Jung Hoo LeeGiants| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 6/22 | @ TOR | L 2-4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun, 6/21 | vs CLE | W 2-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jake Meyers is a player in his 5th MLB season listed at CF for the Astros. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jake Meyers, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 104 |
| .292 |
| 3 |
| 24 |
| .727 |
| 16 |
| 100 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 148 | .219 | 13 | 61 | .646 | 11 | 101 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 112 | .227 | 10 | 33 | .678 | 5 | 70 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 52 | .227 | 1 | 15 | .582 | 2 | 34 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 49 | .260 | 6 | 28 | .761 | 3 | 38 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sat, 6/20 | vs CLE | L 1-8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat, 6/20 | vs CLE | W 9-3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/17 | vs DET | W 4-2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wed, 6/17 | vs DET | W 4-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/16 | vs DET | L 3-9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun, 6/14 | @ KC | L 0-4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/11 | @ LAA | L 2-3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ LAA | W 5-4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |