
#50 SP · Royals
Height
6'3"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
28
College
Stanford
Draft
2018, Rd 1, #40
Experience
6 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade Kris Bubic
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kris Bubic grades out as a strong SP for Royals (B+ Performance). That places him 69th of 254 graded starting pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B+, good value. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 126 | 4.137931 | 22-38 | 495 | 1.3869731 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 9 | 4.11 | 3-2 | 51 | 1.23 | 50.1 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$6.2M
Guaranteed
$3.7M
AAV
$6.2M/yr
Kris Bubic produces at a tier that grades a B+ performance mark for the Royals. The 28-year-old right-hander has accumulated 51 strikeouts across nine games in 2026, demonstrating the stuff-based upside that attracted trade inquiries from multiple organizations around the league. His win total—three victories so far—reflects the modest volume that comes with a pitcher still working back from injury absence, a reality that tempers his overall impact despite the quality of his stuff relative to other rotation arms. The wrinkle here is the chasm between his on-field production and the media narrative surrounding him: coverage frames Bubic as a cautious comeback story facing genuine uncertainty about his rotation slot, with sixth-starter conversations and replacement storylines dominating the discourse even as his performance metrics land solidly above-average. Kansas City's recent wave of pitching acquisitions—Cole Ragans, Seth Lugo, Carlos Est, and Connor Seabold, among others—signals organizational ambivalence about whether Bubic remains a cornerstone piece or a movable asset in a rotation-shuffling exercise. What matters now is runway: with 95 days remaining in the regular season, Bubic has time to settle into a defined role and quiet the noise, but the front office's active pressure-testing of the rotation suggests his path forward in Kansas City remains genuinely unsettled despite his actual performance justifying confidence.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Kris's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kris Bubic ranks 69th of 254 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Kris between Hunter Barco (B+) just ahead and Dylan Cease (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Hunter BarcoPiratesB+Tyler GlasnowDodgersB+Andrew AlvarezNationalsB+Graded lower
Dylan CeaseBlue JaysAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kris Bubic is a player in his 6th MLB season listed at SP for the Royals. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kris Bubic, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance B+, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 20 |
| 2.55 |
| 8-7 |
| 116 |
| 1.18 |
| 116.1 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 27 | 2.67 | 1-1 | 39 | 1.02 | 30.1 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 3 | 3.94 | 0-2 | 16 | 1.31 | 16.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 28 | 5.58 | 3-13 | 110 | 1.70 | 129.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 29 | 4.43 | 6-7 | 114 | 1.38 | 130.0 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 10 | 4.32 | 1-6 | 49 | 1.48 | 50.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.