
#59 RP · Yankees
Height
6'3"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
30
College
UCLA
Experience
5 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Jake Bird
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jake Bird grades out as a middling RP for Yankees (C- Performance). That places him 303rd of 395 graded relief pitchers. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 213 | 4.7816243 | 12-12 | 236 | 1.4620507 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 22 | 5.00 | 1-1 | 20 | 1.33 | 18.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$975K
Guaranteed
$585K
AAV
$975K/yr
The C- performance grade on Jake Bird reflects a reliever caught between flashes of competence and consistent underperformance in a high-leverage environment. Bird's 2026 season shows 1 win and 20 strikeouts across 22 games, which translates to a depth-piece role with minimal run-support contribution — he's neither accumulating saves nor posting the strikeout-per-appearance rate that would signal elite stuff. His best asset appears to be the ability to generate strikeouts when called upon, but the underlying problem is deployment: he's orbiting between the active roster and Triple-A rather than commanding trust in moments that matter, a pattern that speaks to unreliable command or inconsistent stuff management in actual games. At 30 years old with five seasons of MLB experience, Bird sits at a career juncture where he should be a reliable rotation insurance piece, yet the recent demotion signals he's not meeting that bar even against minor-league competition. The media narrative — framed as a "placeholder" and "most boring route possible" — reflects what the on-field production confirms: Bird is organizational stopgap insurance while the Yankees quietly pursue better bullpen options, not a genuine solution to their relief corps' inconsistency. Unless a dramatic performance spike forces a re-evaluation, Bird will remain low-leverage depth cycling between levels, a 5-year veteran who hasn't cracked the code for sustained MLB effectiveness.
Jake Bird ranks 303rd of 395 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Jake between Kevin Kelly (C) just ahead and Philip Abner (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Kevin KellyRaysCAndrew MorrisTwinsCLucas SimsWhite SoxCGraded lower
Philip AbnerDiamondbacks| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 6/20 | vs CIN | L 2-10 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Fri, 6/19 | vs CIN | W 5-0 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jake Bird is a player in his 5th MLB season listed at RP for the Yankees. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jake Bird, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance C-, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 45 |
| 4.73 |
| 4-1 |
| 62 |
| 1.48 |
| 53.1 |
| 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 27.00 | 0-1 | 4 | 3.00 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 48 | 5.53 | 4-2 | 66 | 1.54 | 55.1 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 35 | 4.50 | 2-2 | 31 | 1.70 | 40.0 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 70 | 4.33 | 3-3 | 77 | 1.35 | 89.1 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 38 | 4.91 | 2-4 | 42 | 1.43 | 47.2 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Wed, 6/17 | vs CHW | W 10-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sun, 6/14 | @ TOR | W 8-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |