
#5 1B · Dodgers
Height
6'4"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
36
College
N/A
Draft
2007, Rd 2, #78
Experience
16 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Grade Freddie Freeman
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Freddie Freeman grades out as an excellent 1B for Dodgers (A Performance). That places him 2nd of 57 graded first basemen. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it good value (B-), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 16+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 2239 | 0.29881337 | 376 | 1356 | 0.89463174 | 106 | 2493 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 61 | .276 | 10 | 35 | .838 | 2 | 64 |
| 2025 |
Length
6 years
Total Value
$162.0M
Guaranteed
$97.2M
AAV
$27.0M/yr
Among 1B contracts at this AAV tier, Freddie Freeman's grades a B- Contract Value Index. The disconnect here isn't between his production and his paycheck — Freeman's A-tier performance grade and his decorated award history (2024 World Series MVP, 2020 NL MVP, multiple All-MLB selections, and Silver Slugger honors) confirm he remains a franchise-caliber bat deep into his mid-thirties — but rather the structural reality of a $27M AAV deal locked in for six years on a 36-year-old player. That's not a condemning verdict; it's the cost of retaining a legitimate cornerstone piece during a window when the Dodgers are actively competing (currently the #2 seed in the National League West and aggressively adding depth). The market for elite first basemen at Freeman's production level typically commands premium AAV regardless of age, and his steady play and universally positive locker-room reputation — as reflected in the current media narrative celebrating his personality and reliability — reinforce his value beyond the box score. The CVI sits at B- because while Freeman's on-field contributions justify the investment, the six-year tail on a player entering his late thirties introduces real front-office risk that a shorter, higher-AAV deal would have mitigated. For a team in active contention, this is a defensible contract anchored to proven excellence, but the longevity component prevents it from climbing higher.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Freddie's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Freddie Freeman ranks 2nd of 57 graded first basemen by performance. That slots Freddie between Nick Kurtz (A+) just ahead and Luis Garcia Jr (A) just behind.
Graded higher
Nick KurtzAthleticsA+Graded lower
Luis Garcia JrNationalsAPete AlonsoOriolesABryce HarperPhillies| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | vs TB | W 1-0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/16 | vs TB | W 4-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Freddie Freeman is a veteran in his 16th MLB season listed at 1B for the Dodgers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Freddie Freeman, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance A, Sentiment A+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 147 |
| .295 |
| 24 |
| 90 |
| .869 |
| 6 |
| 164 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 147 | .282 | 22 | 89 | .854 | 9 | 153 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 161 | .331 | 29 | 102 | .977 | 23 | 211 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 159 | .325 | 21 | 100 | .918 | 13 | 199 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 159 | .300 | 31 | 83 | .896 | 8 | 180 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 60 | .341 | 13 | 53 | 1.102 | 2 | 73 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 158 | .295 | 38 | 121 | .938 | 6 | 176 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 162 | .309 | 23 | 98 | .893 | 10 | 191 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 117 | .307 | 28 | 71 | .989 | 8 | 135 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 158 | .302 | 34 | 91 | .969 | 6 | 178 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 118 | .276 | 18 | 66 | .841 | 3 | 115 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 162 | .288 | 18 | 78 | .847 | 3 | 175 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 147 | .319 | 23 | 109 | .897 | 1 | 176 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 147 | .259 | 23 | 94 | .796 | 2 | 140 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 157 | .282 | 21 | 76 | .794 | 4 | 161 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 20 | .167 | 1 | 1 | .500 | 0 | 4 |
Freeman remains an elite first baseman at 36, earning an A performance grade that places him among the premier players at his position despite entering the twilight phase of his decorated career. The 2024 World Series MVP continues to deliver franchise-caliber production on his $27M AAV contract, backed by a resume that includes an MVP award, multiple Silver Sluggers, and consistent All-MLB selections spanning nearly a decade. However, recent media coverage has zeroed in on periodic slumps and age-related concerns, creating a narrative disconnect between his on-field excellence and public perception. At 16 years into his career after being drafted in the second round by Atlanta in 2007, Freeman's durability and consistent offensive output have been hallmarks of his success, though questions about his long-term future with the Dodgers add uncertainty to his situation. The media's focus on struggles rather than accomplishments reflects a negativity bias that overshadows his continued elite performance, creating a cautiously concerned sentiment despite his proven track record of defying expectations.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sun, 6/14 | @ CHW | L 4-6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/11 | @ PIT | W 8-6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/10 | @ PIT | L 8-9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ PIT | W 12-3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sun, 6/7 | vs LAA | W 9-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs LAA | W 1-0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ ARI | L 2-3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/4 | @ ARI | W 7-0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |