
#15 C · Cubs
Height
6'1"
Weight
212 lbs
Age
31
College
N/A
Draft
2012, Rd 2, #86
Experience
10 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Carson Kelly
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Carson Kelly grades out as a middling C for Cubs (C+ Performance). That places him 34th of 93 graded catchers. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 10+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | ![]() | 45 | .283 | 2 | 17 | .728 | 0 | 41 |
| 2025 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$11.5M
Guaranteed
$6.9M
AAV
$5.8M/yr
How Carson Kelly plays at C earns him a C+ performance grade. The 2026 season numbers tell a middling story: .283 AVG, 2 HR, 28 K across 45 games represents a floor-level contributor at the position who is treading water rather than driving production. His batting average sits acceptably on the surface, but the power vacuum — just two home runs in nearly half a season — underscores why the recent mechanical adjustment headlines are circulating; a catcher producing at this volume at age 31 becomes a roster question rather than a fixture. The strikeout total (28 K in 45 games) signals plate discipline issues that align with beat-writer concerns about consistency, and recurring lineup absences suggest the Cubs front office is actively rotating him out, which at $5.8M feels like a sunk investment rather than a cornerstone piece. For an established veteran with 11 seasons of major-league experience, Kelly's production has fallen into that uncomfortable zone where he is neither a clear starter nor a pure backup — he is a question mark that the Cubs would prefer to answer with someone else. Until the performance climbs materially and the lineup scratches stop, Kelly remains a cautionary tale of a veteran's late-career decline meeting organizational impatience, especially on a club clearly willing to make roster moves on short notice.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Carson's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Carson Kelly ranks 34th of 93 graded catchers by performance. That slots Carson between Agustin Ramirez (C+) just ahead and Rafael Flores (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Agustin RamirezMarlinsC+Moises BallesterosCubsC+Kyle TeelWhite SoxC+Graded lower
Rafael FloresPirates| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/24 | @ NYM | W 10-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri, 6/19 | vs TOR | W 16-2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Carson Kelly is a veteran in his 10th MLB season listed at C for the Cubs. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Carson Kelly, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance C+, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.

| 111 |
| .249 |
| 17 |
| 50 |
| .761 |
| 2 |
| 92 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 60 | .240 | 7 | 29 | .716 | 0 | 43 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 31 | .235 | 2 | 8 | .634 | 0 | 24 |
| 2024 | 91 | .238 | 9 | 37 | .687 | 0 | 67 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 33 | .226 | 1 | 6 | .581 | 1 | 19 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 19 | .173 | 1 | 7 | .540 | 0 | 9 |
| 2023 | 52 | .206 | 2 | 13 | .565 | 1 | 28 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 104 | .211 | 7 | 35 | .616 | 2 | 67 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 98 | .240 | 13 | 46 | .754 | 0 | 73 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 39 | .221 | 5 | 19 | .649 | 0 | 27 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 111 | .245 | 18 | 47 | .826 | 0 | 77 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 19 | .114 | 0 | 3 | .319 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 34 | .174 | 0 | 6 | .457 | 0 | 12 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 10 | .154 | 0 | 1 | .445 | 0 | 2 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/18 | vs COL | W 8-6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/16 | vs COL | W 5-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun, 6/14 | @ SF | L 1-5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/11 | @ COL | W 9-3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/11 | @ COL | L 2-3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |