
National League · Central Division
President of Baseball Operations: Jed Hoyer
Wrigley Field
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
45
Players
71
Transactions
19
Contracts Graded
*(26-man active roster + 40-man expanded roster)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the Cubs the same way it covers every MLB franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the Cubs, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance C-, Sentiment F. Front office leadership: Jed Hoyer.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 19 of 45 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The MLB team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the Cubs
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the Contract Value Index, Cubs is getting good value for the money (B- Contract Value Index). That ranks 17th of 27 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a middle-of-the-pack roster (C- Performance). The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal.
The Cubs' roster construction earns a B- Contract Value Index (CVI), a middling portfolio that reflects a front office caught between competitive pressure and structural overpayment — they've locked themselves into eight deals that significantly exceed fair market value while securing only six genuine value pieces to anchor payroll efficiency. With 19 of 44 roster spots graded, the team's contracted core reveals a lopsided distribution: the bulk of their investment sits in below-market-rate positions, meaning depth and role players are consuming dollars that could've been deployed more strategically in a window where they're sitting at .519 in the playoff race with over three months to play. The six good-value deals likely form the foundation (probably anchored by younger talent or recently acquired bargains), but they're vastly outweighed by the eight overpays, suggesting the front office either overpaid for past performance, locked in aging players before decline, or structured deals with short-term roster flexibility in mind at the cost of long-term opportunity cost. The absence of luxury-tax context in this grade means Chicago's overpayment problem may be even more acute if they're approaching (or already in) the competitive-balance threshold, since every inefficient dollar spent constrains future free-agent targeting or mid-season trade capital. For a franchise 96 days from a potential playoff push, this B- CVI signals they've mortgaged some future flexibility to field a present-day roster — competitive enough to compete in a soft division, but structurally handicapped by contracts that demand immediate return rather than sustainable build.
The Cubs roster grades as average overall, earning a C- Performance grade based on 44 graded players. The roster features 4 ace-caliber performers (A-grade), providing an elite foundation to build around. 19 players grade as quality contributors (B-range), 16 as league-average (C-range), and 9 as depth or below (D/F-range). The combination of high-end talent and reliable contributors makes this a legitimate World Series contender on paper. An active offseason with 36 moves shows the front office is aggressively reshaping the roster. The roster needs breakout performances from young players or a deadline upgrade to become a real threat.
The Chicago Cubs have delivered one of the most polarizing front office performances of the season, earning an F sentiment grade despite a modest 40-37 record and playoff positioning in the National Central. Of 36 total transactions, the fan and media reaction splits almost evenly between 17 positive and 15 mixed responses—but crucially, only 4 earned outright negative sentiment, suggesting the fanbase remains willing to defend most roster moves even as the overall narrative has turned skeptical. The best-graded transaction was the Hunter Harvey acquisition (A+), a clear high-water mark that reminded Cubs supporters the front office could still land impact talent, while the Corbin Martin move (D-) stands as a misstep that exemplified the kind of low-upside gamble that has eroded fan confidence. The pattern here is one of inconsistency rather than systematic failure: the Cubs have compiled more praise-worthy transactions than criticized ones, yet the cumulative effect—the F grade itself—suggests a fundamental disconnect between individual transaction logic and the overall strategic direction, or mounting frustration despite superficial roster additions. With 96 days remaining in the regular season and the Cubs fighting for playoff relevance rather than seizing a clear window, the fanbase appears exhausted by incremental moves that don't meaningfully reshape competitive trajectory. Unless the remaining stretch run produces tangible on-field results, this sentiment floor is unlikely to recover; a Cubs collapse down the stretch would cement this as a season of wasted deadline capital and missed opportunity.
Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.