
#19SG · Washington Wizards
Height
6'6"
Weight
205 lbs
Age
24
College
St. John's
Experience
0 yrs
Grade Kadary Richmond
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kadary Richmond grades out as a strong SG for Washington Wizards (B Impact). That places him 61st of 147 graded shooting guards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a prospect, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 3 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 62.5% | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 3 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 2.7 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$73K
AAV
$73K/yr
Kadary Richmond earns a B Contract Value Index (CVI) on a $73K AAV deal—a valuation that reflects the inherent asymmetry of short-term, low-cost roster experimentation for a prospect still proving his place in the NBA. His C performance grade anchors the evaluation; across just three games in the 2025-26 season, he averaged 8.3 PPG, 3.3 RPG, and 2.7 APG, delivering flashes of two-way intrigue—particularly on the defensive end—but in a sample too thin to constitute evidence of sustained NBA readiness. At $73,153 AAV for a single year, Richmond's contract is essentially a pilot program: the financial commitment is negligible, and the term structure allows the Wizards complete flexibility to cycle through developmental options without salary dead weight or guaranteed years. As an undrafted 24-year-old in his rookie season after completing a 10-day contract, Richmond remains firmly in the G-League pipeline tier rather than an established rotation candidate, and the team's recent signings of other fringe guards signal realistic organizational positioning—this is one opportunity among many, not a long-term bet. The D- sentiment grade captures the honest limbo here: scouts have spotted legitimate athletic tools and defensive instincts worth monitoring, but the narrative wisely remains cautiously optimistic rather than convinced, contingent entirely on Richmond sustaining performance over a real stretch rather than riding a single eye-catching upset. With a one-year deal, there is zero cap risk or commitment extension concerns; the CVI reflects exactly what this contract is—a low-cost, low-risk audition for a fringe prospect with enough on-court intrigue to warrant another look, but no guarantee he'll ever graduate beyond it.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Kadary's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kadary Richmond ranks 61st of 147 graded shooting guards by performance. That slots Kadary between Keon Ellis (C) just ahead and Kasparas Jakucionis (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Keon EllisCleveland CavaliersCJamir WatkinsWashington WizardsCDru SmithMiami HeatCGraded lower
Kasparas JakucionisMiami HeatAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kadary Richmond is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at SG for the Washington Wizards. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kadary Richmond, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance C, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2.7 |
| 0.3 |
| 62.5% |
| 50.0% |
| 100.0% |
Kadary Richmond earns a C Performance grade — solid for a rookie, with room to grow into a larger role. Through 3 games, Kadary is contributing 8.3 points, 3.3 rebounds, and 2.7 assists per game in his role. Kadary's strongest area is FG% at 62.5, which compares favorably to the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 8.3 (shooting guard median: 15.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Kadary ranks 61st. At 24, Kadary is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Washington Wizards.
Coverage volume around Kadary Richmond produces a D- sentiment grade in the current window. The narrative sits in that classic limbo between genuine intrigue and appropriate skepticism — scouts and media outlets have spotted legitimate two-way flashes, particularly on the defensive end, and his 2025-26 season line of 8.3 PPG, 3.3 RPG, and 2.7 APG across 3 games did generate real buzz after that upset win over the Pacers, but the sample is so thin that enthusiasm remains cautiously optimistic rather than convinced. The tension between a C performance grade and the media's willingness to highlight his steal rate and per-minute efficiency tells you exactly where skepticism sets in — this is an undrafted guard fighting his way through the G-League pipeline who earned a 10-day contract and delivered one eye-catching debut, not a prospect with sustained NBA-level evidence. The Wizards' recent decision to sign Julian Reese, Jamir Watkins, and Keshon Gilbert in succession frames Richmond as one developmental option among several, signaling that Washington is cycling through fringe roster candidates rather than committing to him as a rotation cornerstone. What keeps the sentiment from bottoming out is the substance of those early flashes and the underdog narrative itself — Richmond has enough on-court intrigue to warrant another opportunity, but only sustained performance over a real stretch, not three games, will transform this from feel-good story into something durable.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.