#1PG · Cleveland Cavaliers
Height
6'5"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
36
College
Arizona State
Experience
16 yrs
Wingspan
6'10.8"
Reach
8'7.5"
Grade James Harden
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, James Harden grades out as an excellent PG for Cleveland Cavaliers (A Impact). That places him 5th of 93 graded point guards. In his on-court role, the grade is excellent (A+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it good value (B+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 16+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career |  | 1221 | 23.6 | 4.8 | 8.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 43.4% | 36.4% | 86.3% |
| 2025-26 | | 70 | 23.6 | 4.8 | 8.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 43.4% | 37.5% | 88.4% |
| 2024-25 |  | 79 | 22.8 | 5.8 | 8.7 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 41.0% | 35.2% | 87.4% |
| 2023-24 | | 72 | 16.6 | 5.1 | 8.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 42.8% | 38.1% | 87.8% |
| 2022-23 |  | 58 | 21.0 | 6.1 | 10.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 44.1% | 38.5% | 86.7% |
| 2021-22 | | 65 | 22.0 | 7.7 | 10.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 41.0% | 33.0% | 87.7% |
| 2020-21 |  | 44 | 24.6 | 7.9 | 10.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 46.6% | 36.2% | 86.1% |
| 2019-20 |  | 68 | 34.3 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 44.4% | 35.5% | 86.5% |
| 2018-19 | | 78 | 36.1 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 44.2% | 36.8% | 87.9% |
| 2017-18 | | 72 | 30.4 | 5.4 | 8.8 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 44.9% | 36.7% | 85.8% |
| 2016-17 | | 81 | 29.1 | 8.1 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 44.0% | 34.7% | 84.7% |
| 2015-16 | | 82 | 29.0 | 6.1 | 7.5 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 43.9% | 35.9% | 86.0% |
| 2014-15 | | 81 | 27.4 | 5.7 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 44.0% | 37.5% | 86.8% |
| 2013-14 | | 73 | 25.4 | 4.7 | 6.1 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 45.6% | 36.6% | 86.6% |
| 2012-13 | | 78 | 25.9 | 4.9 | 5.8 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 43.8% | 36.8% | 85.1% |
| 2011-12 |  | 62 | 16.8 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 49.1% | 39.0% | 84.6% |
| 2010-11 | | 82 | 12.2 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 43.6% | 34.9% | 84.3% |
| 2009-10 | | 76 | 9.9 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 40.3% | 37.5% | 80.8% |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | | 70 | 23.6 | 4.8 | 8.0 | 43.4% | A A |
| 2024-25 | | 79 | 22.8 | 5.8 | 8.7 | 41.0% | A A |
| 2023-24 | | 72 | 16.6 | 5.1 | 8.5 | 42.8% | A- A- |
| 2022-23 | | 58 | 21.0 | 6.1 | 10.7 | 44.1% | A A |
| 2021-22 | | 65 | 22.0 | 7.7 | 10.3 | 41.0% | A A |
| 2020-21 | | 44 | 24.6 | 7.9 | 10.8 | 46.6% | A A |
| 2019-20 | | 68 | 34.3 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 44.4% | A+ A+ |
| 2018-19 | | 78 | 36.1 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 44.2% | A+ A+ |
| 2017-18 | | 72 | 30.4 | 5.4 | 8.8 | 44.9% | A+ A+ |
| 2016-17 | | 81 | 29.1 | 8.1 | 11.2 | 44.0% | A+ A+ |
| 2015-16 | | 82 | 29.0 | 6.1 | 7.5 | 43.9% | A A |
| 2014-15 | | 81 | 27.4 | 5.7 | 7.0 | 44.0% | A A |
| 2013-14 | | 73 | 25.4 | 4.7 | 6.1 | 45.6% | A A |
| 2012-13 | | 78 | 25.9 | 4.9 | 5.8 | 43.8% | A- A- |
| 2011-12 | | 62 | 16.8 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 49.1% | B B |
| 2010-11 | | 82 | 12.2 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 43.6% | C- C- |
| 2009-10 | | 76 | 9.9 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 40.3% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 5/26 | vs NYK | L 93-130 | 33 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-6 | -19 |
| Sun, 5/24 | vs NYK | L 108-121 | 41 | 19 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 8-15 | 1-7 | -8 |
| Fri, 5/22 | @ NYK | L 93-109 | 32 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6-15 | 3-7 | -22 |
| Wed, 5/20 | @ NYK | L 104-115 | 42 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5-16 | 1-8 | -6 |
| Mon, 5/18 | @ DET | W 125-94 | 36 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2-10 | 0-6 | +31 |
| Fri, 5/15 | vs DET | L 94-115 | 37 | 23 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6-13 | 3-8 | -5 |
| Thu, 5/14 | @ DET | W 117-113 | 43 | 30 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 8-21 | 3-10 | +11 |
| Tue, 5/12 | vs DET | W 112-103 | 37 | 24 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 5-14 | 5-9 | +9 |
| Sat, 5/9 | vs DET | W 116-109 | 40 | 19 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 8-14 | 3-7 | +8 |
| Thu, 5/7 | @ DET | L 97-107 | 37 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3-13 | 0-4 | -15 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$81.5M
Guaranteed
$81.8M
AAV
$39.2M/yr
James Harden's contract with the Cleveland Cavaliers grades as a B+ CVI — the team is getting good return on this investment relative to other point guards around the league. James's on-court production grades out in the upper tier of NBA point guards, grading him as an elite performer at the position. As a max contract, James's salary is capped by the CBA — meaning the CVI reflects whether production justifies the highest possible investment a team can make in a single player. The production-to-cost ratio is favorable — solid output at a reasonable price point represents good asset management. At 36, the aging curve is the biggest risk factor on this contract — the window for peak production is closing. The 2-year deal keeps the commitment short, giving the team financial flexibility to move on if performance drops.
James Harden is playing at an elite level this season, earning an A+ Performance grade. Among NBA point guards, he's producing at an All-Star or All-NBA caliber. He's averaging 23.6 points, 4.8 rebounds, and 8.0 assists through 1221 games — carrying a significant offensive load. James's strongest area is APG at 8.0, which compares favorably to the point guard median of 4.0. The biggest area for growth is FG% at 43.4 (point guard median: 46.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, James ranks 5th. James is a cornerstone of the Cleveland Cavaliers' roster and is performing at a level that warrants his place among the league's best.
James Harden remains a respected veteran star delivering A-level performance at age 35. Media discusses his pivotal role solving Cleveland's frontcourt needs, indicating continued relevance. His 16-year pedigree and $40.9M contract reflect franchise confidence in his abilities. Headlines focus on lineup construction rather than performance criticism, showing positive regard. Elite production grade outweighs typical media negativity bias surrounding aging superstars.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where James's contract sits relative to comparable money.
James Harden ranks 5th of 93 graded point guards by performance. That slots James between Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (A+) just ahead and LaMelo Ball (A+) just behind.
Graded higher
Shai Gilgeous-AlexanderOklahoma City ThunderA+Tyrese MaxeyPhiladelphia SixersA+Cade CunninghamDetroit PistonsA+Graded lower
LaMelo BallCharlotte HornetsA+Jamal MurrayDenver NuggetsA+De'Aaron FoxSan Antonio SpursA+Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
James Harden is a veteran in his 16th NBA season listed at PG for the Cleveland Cavaliers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on James Harden, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance A+, Sentiment A+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.