
#3SF · Toronto Raptors
Height
6'8"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
28
College
Duke
Experience
9 yrs
Grade Brandon Ingram
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Brandon Ingram grades out as a strong SF for Toronto Raptors (B- Impact). That places him 10th of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is excellent (A Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is very positive (A Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 572 | 21.5 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 47.7% | 36.6% | 79.2% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 77 | 21.5 | 5.6 | 3.7 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 77 | 21.5 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 47.7% | B+ B+ |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 18 | 22.2 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 46.5% | B+ B+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 64 | 20.8 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 49.2% | B+ B+ |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 45 | 24.7 | 5.5 | 5.8 | 48.4% | B+ B+ |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 55 | 22.7 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 46.1% | B+ B+ |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 61 | 23.8 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 46.6% | B+ B+ |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 62 | 23.8 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 46.3% | A A |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 52 | 18.3 | 5.1 | 3.0 | 49.7% | B- B- |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 59 | 16.1 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 47.0% | B B |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 79 | 9.4 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 40.2% | C C |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/29 | @ CLE | L 120-125 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | -2 |
| Sun, 4/26 | vs CLE | W 93-89 | 36 | 23 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$120.0M
Guaranteed
$78.1M
AAV
$38.1M/yr
Brandon Ingram earns a B Contract Value Index (CVI) on a three-year deal worth $38.1M AAV — a contract that reflects both his established veteran standing and the realistic market for a 28-year-old small forward in his tenth season. His A-minus performance grade, anchored by 21.5 PPG, 5.6 RPG, and 3.7 APG across 77 games in the 2025-26 season, positions him as a legitimate tier-one contributor rather than a role player, yet the CVI suggests the deal carries modest inefficiency relative to star-caliber contracts at his position. At $38.1M annually, Ingram's salary lands in the upper-middle range for established wings — above replacement-level money but not elite-tier pricing, a valuation that makes sense for a player with one MIP award and one All-Rookie second-team nod rather than a multi-time All-Star pedigree. The three-year term aligns with his age and career stage: long enough to anchor a roster through a competitive window without overcommitting to the back-nine decline risk. Toronto's recent signings of established guard depth signal a front office belief in building around Ingram as a cornerstone piece, not a placeholder, which underscores that this contract was designed as a foundation deal for sustained contention rather than a one-year rental. The B grade ultimately reflects a contract that is fair value — neither a steal nor an albatross — for a proven, healthy veteran entering what media framing has positioned as his most stable and well-supported environment.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Brandon's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Brandon Ingram ranks 10th of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots Brandon between Jaylen Brown (A) just ahead and Josh Hart (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Jaylen BrownBoston CelticsAMichael Porter Jr.Brooklyn NetsAJimmy Butler IIIGolden State WarriorsAGraded lower
Josh HartNew York KnicksNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Brandon Ingram is a veteran in his 9th NBA season listed at SF for the Toronto Raptors. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Brandon Ingram, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance A-, Sentiment A.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.8 |
| 0.7 |
| 47.7% |
| 38.2% |
| 82.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 18 | 22.2 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 46.5% | 37.4% | 85.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 64 | 20.8 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 49.2% | 35.5% | 80.1% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 45 | 24.7 | 5.5 | 5.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 48.4% | 39.0% | 88.2% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 55 | 22.7 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 46.1% | 32.7% | 82.6% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 61 | 23.8 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 46.6% | 38.1% | 87.8% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 62 | 23.8 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 46.3% | 39.1% | 85.1% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 52 | 18.3 | 5.1 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 49.7% | 33.0% | 67.5% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 59 | 16.1 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 47.0% | 39.0% | 68.1% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 79 | 9.4 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 40.2% | 29.4% | 62.2% |
| 6 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 6-23 |
| 3-7 |
| +1 |
| Fri, 4/24 | vs CLE | W 126-104 | 29 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5-9 | 1-2 | +15 |
| Mon, 4/20 | @ CLE | L 105-115 | 36 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3-15 | 1-3 | -15 |
| Sat, 4/18 | @ CLE | L 113-126 | 36 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 0-1 | -19 |
| Sun, 4/12 | vs BKN | W 136-101 | 32 | 25 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7-10 | 3-5 | +22 |
| Fri, 4/10 | @ NYK | L 95-112 | 35 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 8-15 | 0-2 | -9 |
| Thu, 4/9 | vs MIA | W 128-114 | 37 | 38 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 13-23 | 2-3 | +13 |
Brandon Ingram is playing at an elite level this season, earning an A- Performance grade. Among NBA small forwards, he's producing at an All-Star or All-NBA caliber. He's averaging 21.5 points, 5.6 rebounds, and 3.7 assists through 572 games — carrying a significant offensive load. Brandon's strongest area is PPG at 21.5, which compares favorably to the small forward median of 15.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 3.7 (small forward median: 4.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Brandon ranks 10th. Brandon is a cornerstone of the Toronto Raptors' roster and is performing at a level that warrants his place among the league's best.
Fan reaction and beat coverage cluster around an A sentiment grade for Brandon Ingram. The narrative has undergone a quiet but unmistakable rehabilitation: Ingram, long framed as a "misunderstood" talent in league circles, has become the quiet catalyst behind Toronto's unlikely playoff push, with media outlets and supporters finally crediting his professional demeanor and leadership for stabilizing a young roster at a critical juncture. His Eastern Conference Player of the Week award validated what beat writers covering the Raptors had been building toward all season—that his 21.5 points, 5.6 rebounds, and 3.7 assists per game across 77 games in the 2025-26 season represent not just consistent production, but the kind of steady excellence that anchors postseason contention. Recent front office moves—the signing of Markelle Fultz and the broader retooling around established veterans—signal the organization's commitment to building around Ingram as a cornerstone piece, further cementing his status in Toronto's resurgence narrative rather than positioning him as a rental or placeholder. The only friction point is the persistent "misunderstood" undercurrent: fans acknowledge that Ingram remains underappreciated league-wide, a framing that paradoxically strengthens his reputation within Toronto while underscoring a broader perception gap between his actual impact and national recognition. With the Raptors at 46-36 and positioned as a genuine upset threat in the playoffs, Ingram's standing has shifted from "underrated All-Star" to "the guy Toronto built around"—a meaningful recalibration that explains the A-grade sentiment even as his performance grade holds steady at B+.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.