
LF · Astros
Grade Taylor Trammell
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Taylor Trammell grades out as a middling LF for Astros (C Performance). That places him 65th of 84 graded left fielders. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 207 | 0.1904762 | 18 | 58 | 0.6428572 | 8 | 96 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 29 | .276 | 0 | 7 | .705 | 1 | 21 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 52 | .197 | 3 |
Taylor Trammell ranks 65th of 84 graded left fielders by performance. That slots Taylor between Blake Dunn (C+) just ahead and Nathan Church (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Blake DunnRedsC+Tim TawaDiamondbacksC+MJ MelendezMetsC+Graded lower
Nathan ChurchCardinals| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 7/7 | @ WAS | W 6-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 7/4 | vs TB | W 10-8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Taylor Trammell is a player on the Astros roster listed at LF for the Astros. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Taylor Trammell, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance C, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 12 |
| .629 |
| 3 |
| 23 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 5 | .000 | 0 | — | .000 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 5 | 1.000 | 0 | — | 2.000 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 10 | .143 | 0 | — | .393 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 22 | .130 | 3 | 11 | .612 | 0 | 6 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 43 | .196 | 4 | 10 | .686 | 2 | 20 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 51 | .160 | 8 | 18 | .615 | 2 | 25 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sat, 7/4 | vs TB | L 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 7/2 | vs MIN | L 3-8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sun, 6/28 | @ DET | W 7-5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/27 | @ DET | W 8-6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Fri, 6/26 | @ DET | L 0-8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/25 | @ DET | W 2-1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |