
SP · Blue Jays
Grade Patrick Corbin
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Patrick Corbin grades out as a middling SP for Blue Jays (C Performance). That places him 192nd of 262 graded starting pitchers. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 386 | 4.5071135 | 112-145 | 1903 | 1.3748024 | 0.0 | 2 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 13 | 4.57 | 2-3 | 43 | 1.48 | 61.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 31 | 4.40 |
Production at SP earns Patrick Corbin a C performance grade in the current MLB sample. The 2026 season stats of 2W across 13 games with 43 strikeouts paint the picture of a back-end rotation depth arm functioning at a replacement-level capacity — he's eating innings without collapsing, which is precisely what Toronto needed when injuries gutted the staff, but nothing about that profile suggests he's a piece the franchise intends to lean on long-term. Strikeout volume remains his only reliable production metric in a season marked by minimal wins and modest overall impact, the kind of workmanlike output expected from a reclamation project rather than a foundational contributor. The glaring weakness is his win-loss record: just two victories across his games pitched indicates weak run support, poor results when it matters most, or both — for a pitcher at this stage of his career signed to a $1M prove-it deal, those aren't the numbers that inspire confidence heading into September. Corbin's role is strictly utilitarian: a back-of-the-rotation filler deployed in a desperate injury situation, and the mediaFraming around his signing leaves no room for narrative rehabilitation unless the Blue Jays' injury picture stabilizes and he begins consistently outperforming the rock-bottom expectations baked into his arrival. At 14 seasons deep as a longtime veteran, he's not a development prospect or a future piece — he's a stopgap, and the franchise's ongoing roster churn (trades, signings, IL shuffles across multiple position groups) underscores that Toronto is in triage mode, not contention mode.
Patrick Corbin ranks 192nd of 262 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Patrick between Jose Quintana (C) just ahead and Mitch Keller (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Jose QuintanaRockiesCJack KochanowiczAngelsCBen BrownCubsCGraded lower
Mitch KellerPirates| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 7/1 | vs NYM | W 9-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Fri, 6/26 | vs TEX | L 4-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Patrick Corbin is a player on the Blue Jays roster listed at SP for the Blue Jays. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Patrick Corbin, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance C, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 7-11 |
| 131 |
| 1.36 |
| 155.1 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 32 | 5.62 | 6-13 | 139 | 1.50 | 174.2 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 32 | 5.20 | 10-15 | 124 | 1.48 | 180.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 31 | 6.31 | 6-19 | 128 | 1.70 | 152.2 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 31 | 5.82 | 9-16 | 143 | 1.47 | 171.2 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 11 | 4.66 | 2-7 | 60 | 1.57 | 65.2 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 33 | 3.25 | 14-7 | 238 | 1.18 | 202.0 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 33 | 3.15 | 11-7 | 246 | 1.05 | 200.0 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 33 | 4.03 | 14-13 | 178 | 1.42 | 189.2 | 0 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 36 | 5.15 | 5-13 | 131 | 1.56 | 155.2 | 1 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 3.60 | 6-5 | 78 | 1.27 | 85.0 | 0 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 32 | 3.41 | 14-8 | 178 | 1.17 | 208.1 | 0 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 22 | 4.54 | 6-8 | 86 | 1.33 | 107.0 | 1 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.