
#28 SP · Rays
Height
6'1"
Weight
200 lbs
Age
35
College
Fordham
Draft
2011, Rd 18, #564
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Grade Nick Martinez
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Nick Martinez grades out as a middling SP for Rays (C Performance). That places him 151st of 251 graded starting pitchers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 289 | 4.012412 | 52-60 | 705 | 1.2881583 | 0.0 | 9 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 12 | 2.29 | 5-2 | 42 | 1.19 | 70.2 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$13.0M
Guaranteed
$7.8M
AAV
$13.0M/yr
The Rays' one-year, $13M commitment to Nick Martinez earns a D+ CVI, representing a puzzling overpay for a franchise typically celebrated for extracting maximum value from every dollar spent. While Martinez has evolved into an above-average starter who can capably anchor the back of a rotation, paying $13M annually for that production level contradicts Tampa Bay's usual market efficiency, especially on a short-term deal that offers no long-term cost certainty. The contract becomes even more questionable when considering the Rays' perpetual need to allocate resources carefully across their entire roster while competing in the brutal AL East, where this money could have been better deployed across multiple impact pieces or younger talent with higher upside. Martinez's age and injury history make this a high-risk proposition for a team that typically targets players in their prime or ascending phases, not veterans commanding premium starter money on prove-it deals. For an organization that has mastered the art of finding rotation depth at bargain prices, this signing feels uncharacteristically desperate and misaligned with their proven development pipeline.
Among starting pitchers on the Rays, Nick Martinez's output grades to a C performance level. The 2026 season shows Martinez has logged 5 wins across 12 games with 42 strikeouts—pedestrian production for a $13M AAV one-year deal, especially at age 35 when durability and consistent velocity become liabilities rather than assets. The strikeout total represents his most functional output in a limited sample, but it's paired with a hamstring injury that has already pushed him back and created concrete availability concerns that compound the contract skepticism. As an established veteran entering his ninth season, Martinez is operating in a depth-piece capacity for a Tampa Bay team currently hunting the AL East lead, but the visibility of his salary makes every start feel like it's being scrutinized—middling performance on a premium contract is a narrative that doesn't resolve itself. The media consensus has been firmly critical since announcement, and while his work ethic and intentionality have earned isolated praise, those qualities don't address the core question: whether a 35-year-old with injury history justified this price tag when the Rays have been actively signing younger alternatives around him. With the team riding three straight wins and holding the division's top seed, team success is providing cover, but Martinez's personal trajectory remains one of cautious skepticism trending downward.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Nick's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Nick Martinez ranks 151st of 251 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Nick between Sean Manaea (C+) just ahead and Brayan Bello (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Sean ManaeaMetsC+Grayson RodriguezAngelsC+Jameson TaillonCubsC+Graded lower
Brayan BelloRed Sox| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/9 | vs BOS | W 4-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs DET | L 2-7 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Nick Martinez is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at SP for the Rays. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Nick Martinez, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D+, Performance C, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 40 |
| 4.45 |
| 11-14 |
| 116 |
| 1.21 |
| 165.2 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 42 | 3.10 | 10-7 | 116 | 1.03 | 142.1 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 63 | 3.43 | 6-4 | 106 | 1.26 | 110.1 | 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 47 | 3.47 | 4-4 | 95 | 1.29 | 106.1 | 8 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 23 | 5.66 | 3-8 | 67 | 1.37 | 111.1 | 0 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 12 | 5.59 | 2-3 | 16 | 1.66 | 38.2 | 0 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 24 | 3.96 | 7-7 | 77 | 1.45 | 125.0 | 0 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 29 | 4.55 | 5-12 | 77 | 1.46 | 140.1 | 0 |
The public narrative around Nick Martinez is firmly negative, and the sentiment has only deteriorated over the last 30 days — a D grade that reflects a fanbase and media contingent that never fully bought into this signing. The $13M AAV one-year deal drew immediate skepticism at the moment it was announced, with coverage questioning whether a 35-year-old established veteran at that price point represented genuine roster-building or a stopgap measure dressed up as commitment. A hamstring injury that pushed Martinez back early on poured fuel on that fire, turning abstract contract concerns into concrete availability questions before he had a chance to make his case on the mound. On-field, his performance grades out at a C — middling by any standard, and certainly not the kind of production that quiets critics when the dollar figure attached is this visible. The Rays have been active in recent weeks, adding arms like Steven Matz, Casey Legumina, and Edwin Uceta while also bringing in Gavin Lux, which signals a front office still patching and problem-solving — context that makes Martinez's $13M look even more conspicuous when cheaper alternatives are being layered in around him. The one thread of goodwill in the coverage centers on Martinez's professionalism and intentionality in his new environment, but work ethic praise rarely moves the needle when the broader question is whether the contract was justified. With the Rays sitting at 24-12 and riding a six-game winning streak, the team success has provided a buffer — but Martinez personally owns a narrative that is cautiously skeptical at best, and trending in the wrong direction.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.