Height
6'4"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
25
College
UC Santa Barbara
Draft
2021, Rd 1, #18
Experience
2 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Fan Verdict
Grade this player:
Career StatsA-
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career |  | 23 | 3.8273196 | 11-5 | 85 | 1.136598 | 0.0 | 0 |
Current Contract
Length
1 year
AAV
$780K/yr
Contract Value Index (CVI)
Michael McGreevy's one-year, $800K deal with the Cardinals earns an A CVI as a textbook example of smart roster construction meeting financial efficiency. For an above-average starter commanding less than a million annually, St. Louis has secured legitimate rotation depth at a fraction of what comparable arms cost on the open market. McGreevy represents exactly the type of value play that allows organizations to allocate resources elsewhere while maintaining competitive depth — particularly crucial for a Cardinals team balancing near-term competitiveness with long-term payroll flexibility. The short-term commitment eliminates future risk while giving the club a season to evaluate whether McGreevy can develop into something more substantial within their system. At this price point, even modest production from a fifth starter role would justify the investment, but the upside potential makes this deal especially compelling. This is precisely how front offices should approach the middle tier of starting pitching, where teams can find genuine MLB contributors without the premium attached to established veterans.
Fan & Media Sentiment
The Cardinals fanbase finds itself cautiously optimistic about Michael McGreevy despite growing concerns about his long-term durability. His spectacular no-hit debut created immediate excitement around the young starter, but reports of declining velocity mid-season have introduced a troubling subplot that's tempering enthusiasm across Cardinals Nation. The sentiment reflects the classic dilemma with promising young pitchers — McGreevy has shown flashes of elite stuff that suggest franchise-caliber potential, yet the physical warning signs have fans and media walking a tightrope between hope and worry. What's particularly striking is how his B+ performance grade actually outpaces the more reserved public perception, suggesting the velocity concerns may be overblown relative to his actual production on the mound. A few more quality starts without further physical red flags would likely swing sentiment decisively in his favor, as Cardinals fans are desperate for homegrown pitching talent to emerge. Right now, McGreevy sits in that precarious middle ground where fans want to believe but aren't quite ready to fully invest emotionally until he proves the durability questions are noise rather than signal.
Recent Games
| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/8 | @ WAS | W 6-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Fri, 4/3 | @ DET | L 0-4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Live Discussion
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Discussion
Loading discussion...