
#4 RF · Blue Jays
Height
6'1"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
36
College
UConn
Draft
2011, Rd 1, #11
Experience
12 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade George Springer
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, George Springer grades out as an excellent RF for Blue Jays (A+ Performance). That places him 3rd of 75 graded right fielders. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it good value (B+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 12+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1488 | 0.26489604 | 298 | 810 | 0.82553375 | 123 | 1516 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 44 | .212 | 5 | 14 | .654 | 3 | 36 |
| 2025 |
Length
6 years
Total Value
$150.0M
Guaranteed
$90.0M
AAV
$25.0M/yr
George Springer delivers the kind of production that earns an A+ performance grade against MLB RF comps. When Springer takes the field, he operates at an elite tier—the grade reflects his standing as a franchise-caliber contributor in the right fielder market, the kind of player who legitimizes a lineup when healthy. His 2026 season shows the fracture in that reliability: across 44 games, he's posted a .212 AVG with 5 HR and 36 K, numbers that read as a steep departure from the caliber of performance the grade suggests. The strikeout volume is the clearest weakness in that profile, and it compounds the fundamental problem—at 36 years old, Springer has absorbed a fractured toe that shelved him for a meaningful stretch, turning an availability question into the defining narrative of his season. The mediaFraming captures it precisely: when he's on the field, the production grade holds at A+, but the injury concerns and time missed have fractured public confidence despite recent positive updates on his return timeline. For a Blue Jays club sitting at 38-39 and scrambling through a brutal injury wave, Springer's value hinges entirely on whether those injury optimism updates translate into actual availability down the stretch—one more setback flips sentiment right back into skepticism.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where George's contract sits relative to comparable money.
George Springer ranks 3rd of 75 graded right fielders by performance. That slots George between Aaron Judge (A+) just ahead and Austin Slater (A+) just behind.
Graded higher
Aaron JudgeYankeesA+Ronald Acuna Jr.BravesA+Graded lower
Austin SlaterRaysA+Corbin CarrollDiamondbacks| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 6/22 | vs HOU | W 4-2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat, 6/20 | @ CHC | W 8-6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
George Springer is a veteran in his 12th MLB season listed at RF for the Blue Jays. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on George Springer, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance A+, Sentiment A+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 140 |
| .309 |
| 32 |
| 84 |
| .959 |
| 18 |
| 154 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 145 | .220 | 19 | 56 | .674 | 16 | 120 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 154 | .258 | 21 | 72 | .732 | 20 | 158 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 133 | .267 | 25 | 76 | .814 | 14 | 137 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 78 | .264 | 22 | 50 | .907 | 4 | 79 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 51 | .265 | 14 | 32 | .899 | 1 | 50 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 122 | .292 | 39 | 96 | .974 | 6 | 140 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 140 | .265 | 22 | 71 | .780 | 6 | 144 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 140 | .283 | 34 | 85 | .889 | 5 | 155 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 162 | .261 | 29 | 82 | .816 | 9 | 168 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 102 | .276 | 16 | 41 | .826 | 16 | 107 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 78 | .231 | 20 | 51 | .804 | 5 | 68 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Fri, 6/19 | @ CHC | L 2-16 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/18 | @ BOS | W 4-3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Wed, 6/17 | @ BOS | W 3-0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/16 | @ BOS | W 6-1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Sun, 6/14 | vs NYY | L 3-8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mon, 6/8 | vs PHI | L 2-5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs BAL | W 6-4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |