
RP · Rays
Grade Craig Kimbrel
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Craig Kimbrel grades out as an excellent RP for Rays (A+ Performance). That places him 9th of 415 graded relief pitchers. The public read is very positive (A Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 870 | 2.6443298 | 56-50 | 1300 | 1.0289452 | 0.0 | 440 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 14 | 6.00 | 0-2 | 15 | 1.47 | 15.0 | 0 |
| 2026 |
Craig Kimbrel's WAR-tier baseline and counting stats together earn an A+ performance grade. The veteran reliever's 2026 season output of 15 strikeouts across 14 games demonstrates the kind of high-leverage strike-throwing ability that defined his career as a nine-time All-Star and 2011 Rookie of the Year—elite command in a limited sample remains elite command. His primary weakness is the absence of wins and the sparse volume itself; 14 games is a small platform, and the lack of a decision column suggests he's been deployed situationally rather than in traditional save situations, which constrains the overall impact narrative despite the quality of each appearance. Playing for a Rays team sitting at 43–31 and currently holding the fourth seed in the AL East, Kimbrel is functioning as part of a bullpen rotation rather than a dominant closer anchoring it, a reality that aligns with his journeyman trajectory—his tenth franchise in two decades of professional baseball. The gap between his on-field performance (A+) and his public perception (B–) is stark: media coverage has reframed him as a minor-league call-up and depth piece, a narrative shift so complete that even elite recent production struggles to break through the story of decline. At 17 seasons played, Kimbrel is operating in the veteran-depth tier, where flashes of excellence matter far less than organizational stability and the question of whether teams view him as expendable.
Craig Kimbrel ranks 9th of 415 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Craig between Robert Suarez (A+) just ahead and Ron Marinaccio (A+) just behind.
Graded higher
Robert SuarezBravesA+Hunter HarveyCubsA+Bryan HudsonWhite SoxA+Graded lower
Ron MarinaccioPadres| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 7/12 | vs SEA | L 2-8 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Thu, 7/9 | vs NYY | L 4-12 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Craig Kimbrel is a player on the Rays roster listed at RP for the Rays. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Craig Kimbrel, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance A+, Sentiment A.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 5 |
| 2.25 |
| 0-0 |
| 3 |
| 1.25 |
| 4.0 |
| 0 |
| 2026 | 19 | 5.21 | 0-2 | 18 | 1.42 | 19.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 1 | 0.00 | 0-0 | 1 | 2.00 | 1.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 13 | 2.45 | 0-1 | 16 | 1.36 | 11.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 14 | 2.25 | 0-1 | 17 | 1.42 | 12.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 57 | 5.33 | 7-5 | 73 | 1.36 | 52.1 | 23 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 71 | 3.26 | 8-6 | 94 | 1.04 | 69.0 | 23 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 63 | 3.75 | 6-7 | 72 | 1.32 | 60.0 | 22 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 39 | 0.49 | 2-3 | 64 | 0.71 | 36.2 | 23 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 24 | 5.09 | 2-2 | 36 | 1.22 | 23.0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 63 | 2.26 | 4-5 | 100 | 0.91 | 59.2 | 24 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 18 | 5.28 | 0-1 | 28 | 1.43 | 15.1 | 2 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 23 | 6.53 | 0-4 | 30 | 1.60 | 20.2 | 13 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 63 | 2.74 | 5-1 | 96 | 0.99 | 62.1 | 42 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 67 | 1.43 | 5-0 | 126 | 0.68 | 69.0 | 35 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 57 | 3.40 | 2-6 | 83 | 1.09 | 53.0 | 31 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 61 | 2.58 | 4-2 | 87 | 1.04 | 59.1 | 39 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 63 | 1.61 | 0-3 | 95 | 0.91 | 61.2 | 47 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 68 | 1.21 | 4-3 | 98 | 0.88 | 67.0 | 50 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 63 | 1.01 | 3-1 | 116 | 0.65 | 62.2 | 42 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 79 | 2.10 | 4-3 | 127 | 1.04 | 77.0 | 46 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 21 | 0.44 | 4-0 | 40 | 1.21 | 20.2 | 1 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sat, 7/4 | @ HOU | L 8-10 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |