
#41 1B · Diamondbacks
Height
5'10"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
40
College
N/A
Experience
16 yrs
Bats/Throws
B/R
Grade Carlos Santana
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Carlos Santana grades out as a shaky 1B for Diamondbacks (D Performance). That places him 57th of 59 graded first basemen. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D, a slight overpay. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 16+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 2212 | 0.24008164 | 335 | 1136 | 0.77525866 | 65 | 1882 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 8 | .083 | 0 | — | .279 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.0M
Guaranteed
$1.2M
AAV
$2.0M/yr
Stacked against the 1B field, Carlos Santana grades out at a D performance level for the Diamondbacks. A 40-year-old operating in his 17th major-league season, Santana has delivered below-average production across the board — his 2026 season numbers show a .83 AVG, 0 HR, and 8 K across 8 games, a stat line that underscores both limited availability and minimal offensive contribution. The one quantifiable strength here is defensive positioning; his recent highlight-reel plays in foul territory reflect the same glove work that earned him a Gold Glove in 2024, but a first baseman's value depends overwhelmingly on run production, and Santana is not delivering there. An early-season groin injury has compounded the durability concerns already baked into his age, fragmenting what little impact he might otherwise generate — a damning dynamic for any veteran, let alone one signed to modest expectations on a team sitting 39-38 and clinging to a playoff spot. The Diamondbacks' recent roster construction tells the real story: the signing of first baseman Tyler Locklear in May signaled plainly that Arizona views Santana as expendable depth rather than a cornerstone, a framing that aligns perfectly with his on-field struggles and the negative sentiment now surrounding his season.
The public narrative surrounding Carlos Santana has turned decidedly negative, and the sentiment grade reflects a story that is trending in the wrong direction with no obvious catalyst for a reversal. The early-season groin injury has become the defining frame for his 2026 campaign — coverage has shifted almost entirely toward injury management and availability concerns rather than anything he's producing between the white lines, which is a damning place for a 40-year-old first baseman to find himself. That narrative aligns squarely with his on-field output, which grades out at the below-average end of the spectrum, confirming this isn't a case of unfair media scrutiny outpacing actual performance. His modest contract signals the Diamondbacks always saw this as a depth role rather than an impact assignment, but even within those limited expectations, Santana has struggled to carve out a stable presence. The team's recent roster activity compounds the problem significantly — signing Tyler Locklear, a first baseman, in early May is a pointed organizational signal that Arizona is actively evaluating its options at the position Santana occupies. When you layer in a 17-17 record sitting on the wrong side of the playoff cutline in the National League West and a team busy shuffling infield pieces, there is virtually no goodwill in the environment to absorb a veteran's injury-hampered stretch. The bottom line: Santana's resume includes a 2024 Gold Glove and a 2019 Silver Slugger, but those credentials feel distant right now, and the current narrative is one of a 16-year veteran whose physical durability is openly in question at the worst possible time.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Carlos's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Carlos Santana ranks 57th of 59 graded first basemen by performance. That slots Carlos between Luken Baker (D+) just ahead and Joc Pederson (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Luken BakerDiamondbacksD+Nathaniel LoweRedsD+Jake BurgerRangersDGraded lower
Joc PedersonRangersAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Carlos Santana is a veteran in his 16th MLB season listed at 1B for the Diamondbacks. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Carlos Santana, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance D, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 116 |
| .225 |
| 11 |
| 52 |
| .649 |
| 7 |
| 89 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 8 | .105 | 0 | 2 | .263 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 124 | .219 | 11 | 54 | .633 | 7 | 91 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 150 | .238 | 23 | 71 | .748 | 4 | 124 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 94 | .235 | 12 | 53 | .733 | 6 | 81 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 52 | .249 | 11 | 33 | .773 | 0 | 51 |
| 2023 | 146 | .240 | 23 | 86 | .747 | 6 | 132 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 52 | .216 | 4 | 21 | .690 | 0 | 38 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 79 | .192 | 15 | 39 | .693 | 0 | 49 |
| 2022 | 131 | .202 | 19 | 60 | .692 | 0 | 87 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 158 | .214 | 19 | 69 | .661 | 2 | 121 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 60 | .199 | 8 | 30 | .699 | 0 | 41 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 158 | .281 | 34 | 93 | .912 | 4 | 161 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 161 | .229 | 24 | 86 | .766 | 2 | 128 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 154 | .259 | 23 | 79 | .818 | 5 | 148 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 158 | .259 | 34 | 87 | .864 | 5 | 151 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 154 | .231 | 19 | 85 | .752 | 11 | 127 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 152 | .231 | 27 | 85 | .792 | 5 | 125 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 154 | .268 | 20 | 74 | .832 | 3 | 145 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 143 | .252 | 18 | 76 | .785 | 3 | 128 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 155 | .239 | 27 | 79 | .808 | 5 | 132 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 46 | .260 | 6 | 22 | .868 | 3 | 39 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.