
RP · Mets
Grade Carl Edwards Jr
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Carl Edwards Jr grades out as an excellent RP for Mets (A- Performance). That places him 71st of 384 graded relief pitchers. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 302 | 3.5136986 | 16-14 | 345 | 1.2089041 | 0.0 | 7 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 2 | 1.50 | 0-0 | 11 | 1.17 | 6.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 2 | 9.00 |
| Season | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | ![]() | 58 | 2.60 | 3-2 | 67 | 1.31 | A A |
| 2017 | ![]() | 73 | 2.98 | 5-4 | 94 | 1.01 | A A |
| 2016 | ![]() | 36 | 3.75 | 0-1 | 52 | 0.81 | B B |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Carl Edwards Jr. grades out as a genuinely effective relief arm at the moment, earning an A- performance mark that stands well above what the Mets are getting from most of their bullpen pieces during a rough 9-17 start. His callup came as a contract selection, making him one of the more quietly productive additions the organization has made in recent weeks — the on-field performance grade tells a stronger story than the transaction's low-key optics suggest. The performance data reflects a pitcher contributing at a above-average level for a relief role, which carries real value on a roster that has been cycling through moves with notable regularity. That said, his Contract Value Index (CVI) picture is constrained by the nature of a rookie scale contract, which keeps cost controlled but also signals where the organization sees his ceiling — functional depth rather than a cornerstone of the late innings. The media framing here is honest: Edwards Jr. is a veteran presence filling a relief role, not a difference-maker, and his arrival drew more skepticism than excitement given that it came at the expense of a prospect in Christian Scott. The sentiment grade sitting at C- reflects that disconnect between what his performance data actually shows and how the fanbase is receiving the move — fans watching a team seven games under .500 want bold answers, and a routine bullpen transaction does not feel like one. With 154 days left in the regular season, there is plenty of time for Edwards Jr. to either prove himself a reliable piece of the relief structure or fade back into roster footnote territory, but right now the performance data suggests the Mets are getting more out of him than the headlines imply.
Carl Edwards Jr ranks 71st of 384 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Carl between Ryan Helsley (A-) just ahead and Pete Fairbanks (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Ryan HelsleyOriolesA-Andrew KittredgeOriolesA-Troy MeltonTigersA-Graded lower
Pete FairbanksMarlinsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Carl Edwards Jr is a player on the Mets roster listed at RP for the Mets. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Carl Edwards Jr, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance A-, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0-0 |
| 2 |
| 1.67 |
| 3.0 |
| 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 2 | 0.00 | 0-0 | 4 | 0.67 | 3.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 4 | 4.50 | 0-0 | 6 | 1.17 | 6.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 1 | -.-- | 0-0 | — | -.-- | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 32 | 3.69 | 1-3 | 24 | 1.52 | 31.2 | 2 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 57 | 2.76 | 6-3 | 56 | 1.23 | 62.0 | 2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 1 | 81.00 | 0-0 | 1 | 12.00 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 6 | 6.75 | 0-0 | 5 | 1.88 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | 7 | 11.12 | 0-0 | 6 | 2.47 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 5 | 1.93 | 0-0 | 6 | 0.64 | 4.2 | 1 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 20 | 5.87 | 1-1 | 17 | 1.11 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 2 | 32.40 | 0-0 | 2 | 4.80 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2019 | 22 | 8.47 | 1-1 | 19 | 1.47 | 17.0 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 58 | 2.60 | 3-2 | 67 | 1.31 | 52.0 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 73 | 2.98 | 5-4 | 94 | 1.01 | 66.1 | 0 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 36 | 3.75 | 0-1 | 52 | 0.81 | 36.0 | 2 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 5 | 3.86 | 0-0 | 4 | 1.29 | 4.2 | 0 |
Carl Edwards Jr.'s return to the Mets has landed with a thud, generating the kind of muted, indifferent reaction that defines a D sentiment grade — fans and media alike treating this as a necessary roster maneuver rather than a meaningful acquisition. Coverage has been almost entirely transactional, framing his contract selection as organizational housekeeping rather than a purposeful bullpen upgrade, with no celebratory tone attached to his name and no notable Mets-era accolades to lean on. The disconnect here is genuinely striking: his on-field production earns an A- performance grade, meaning the actual results don't justify the public skepticism — but perception in this case is being driven by narrative, not numbers. The move drew particular criticism because it came at the direct expense of Christian Scott, a prospect the fanbase views with considerably more excitement, making Edwards Jr. the symbol of a subtraction rather than an addition. That framing has been further complicated by the broader organizational context — the Mets have been active with signings and roster shuffles recently, and in that busy environment, Edwards Jr. reads as depth filler rather than a deliberate solution to a pressing need. Until he either distances himself from the Scott narrative or forces his way into high-leverage situations and delivers, the public perception of him as a below-average, replacement-level arm is unlikely to shift — no matter what his actual performance says.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.