
#16 CF · Phillies
Height
6'2"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
28
College
N/A
Draft
2016, Rd 2, #60
Experience
5 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Grade Brandon Marsh
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Brandon Marsh grades out as a strong CF for Phillies (B- Performance). That places him 27th of 70 graded center fielders. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 657 | 0.26699266 | 57 | 258 | 0.7565579 | 56 | 546 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 57 | .333 | 5 | 25 | .841 | 5 | 67 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$5.2M
Guaranteed
$3.1M
AAV
$5.2M/yr
Brandon Marsh grades a B- performance mark, with his All-Star caliber stretches anchoring the read. His 2026 season line of .333 AVG across 57 games represents the kind of contact quality that kept him afloat as a functional, below-average starter — the batting average itself is his clearest offensive tool and the one statistical distinction that generated some bemused media attention for its historical rarity. The strikeout total of 49 K in 57 games, however, exposes the volatility baked into that average; the contact rate masks a player who remains prone to extended swings and miss, undercutting consistency and limiting his upside in high-leverage moments. At 28 and in his sixth big-league season, Marsh occupies a depth role rather than an everyday centerpiece — the games played total suggests a functional contributor rather than a workhorse, and the FanGraphs criticism of his expected 2026 production carries real weight when paired with the strikeout volume. The Phillies' recent wave of roster moves — adding outfield depth like Steward Berroa and reinforcing the bullpen — reads as a front office acknowledgment that this iteration of the outfield, with Marsh as a central piece, requires external intervention to compete, a narrative that will persist until Philadelphia meaningfully upgrades the position around him.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Brandon's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Brandon Marsh ranks 27th of 70 graded center fielders by performance. That slots Brandon between Bryce Johnson (B-) just ahead and TJ Friedl (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Bryce JohnsonPadresB-JJ BledayRedsB-Austin MartinTwinsB-Graded lower
TJ FriedlReds| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/24 | @ WAS | W 5-4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mon, 6/22 | @ WAS | L 1-4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Brandon Marsh is a player in his 5th MLB season listed at CF for the Phillies. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Brandon Marsh, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B-, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 133 |
| .280 |
| 11 |
| 43 |
| .785 |
| 7 |
| 106 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 135 | .249 | 16 | 60 | .747 | 19 | 104 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 133 | .277 | 12 | 60 | .830 | 10 | 112 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 93 | .226 | 8 | 37 | .637 | 8 | 66 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 41 | .288 | 3 | 15 | .774 | 2 | 38 |
| 2022 | 134 | .245 | 11 | 52 | .679 | 10 | 104 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 70 | .254 | 2 | 19 | .673 | 6 | 60 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sun, 6/21 | vs NYM | W 6-2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat, 6/20 | vs NYM | W 15-3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/18 | vs NYM | L 4-6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Wed, 6/17 | vs MIA | L 4-12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Tue, 6/16 | vs MIA | W 8-2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Mon, 6/15 | vs MIA | W 7-0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun, 6/14 | @ MIL | L 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ TOR | L 2-3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |