B-
A
—
Cast Your Verdict
Cast your verdict:
Quick Reaction
Sentiment Analysis
A
Very Positive
NegativeMixedPositive
A sensible roster maintenance move keeping a young, developmental back in the fold. Multiple outlets covered the re-signing, confirming Tucker held RFA tender status before the deal. The right-of-first-refusal tender signals Tampa values Tucker enough to retain him without a major investment. Fans see this as low-risk depth management rather than an exciting offensive backfield upgrade. Tucker projects as a rotational contributor competing for carries behind the primary ball carriers in 2025.
📰5 news
Contract Value Index (CVI)
B-
Good Value
OverpayFair ValueGreat Value
Tucker's one-year, $3.52M AAV extension with the Buccaneers earns a B- Contract Value Index (CVI) — a fair deal that leans toward slight team-friendly territory given the modest commitment involved. At that price point, Tampa Bay is essentially paying for a dependable depth back rather than a featured starter, which is a reasonable market rate for a running back at this roster level. The single-year structure is smart front office work — it keeps the Buccaneers flexible heading into a pivotal offseason window while giving Tucker a chance to earn a more lucrative deal down the line. The CVI trending upward over the last 30 days suggests the market is beginning to validate this kind of efficient, low-risk depth signing rather than penalize it. With no guaranteed money listed, the contract carries virtually zero downside risk for Tampa Bay — if Tucker underperforms, the roster can be adjusted without significant financial consequence. For a team sitting at 8-9 and needing to maximize every roster dollar, locking in a known commodity at a lean price point is exactly the kind of disciplined, low-glamour move that quietly builds competitive rosters.
Contract Details
- Length
- 1 year
- Total Value
- $3.5M
- AAV
- $3.5M
Fan Verdict
Cast your verdict:
No fan votes yet. Be the first!
News & Buzz
Live Discussion
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Discussion
Loading discussion...