GM: Mike Borgonzi
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
101
Players
37
Transactions
96
Players Graded
*(53 active roster + 16 practice squad + IR/PUP/reserve lists)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the Tennessee Titans the same way it covers every NFL franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the Tennessee Titans, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance F, Sentiment F, Fan Verdict C+. Front office leadership: Mike Borgonzi.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 96 of 101 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The NFL team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the Tennessee Titans
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
🗳 1 fan has weighed in
On the Contract Value Index, Tennessee Titans is spending roughly in line with the market (C Contract Value Index). That ranks 22nd of 32 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a roster among the league’s thinnest (F Performance). The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal. The crowd has weighed in too: 1 fan vote land on a C+ Fan Verdict.
The Tennessee Titans' roster carries a bloated contract portfolio that reflects poor cap discipline and a franchise in transition. Across their 27 graded contracts, only four deals represent genuine value, while eight represent clear overpays—a ratio that reveals a front office struggling to construct an efficient roster during a 3-14 season. Defensively, the Titans found some efficiency at the defensive end position, where they've locked in above-market value; conversely, their defensive tackle group is anchored by contracts that underdeliver relative to salary, a particular vulnerability given the importance of interior line stability. With all 27 contracts on the roster evaluated, the Titans have left no stone unturned in the grading process, yet the concentration of overpays suggests systemic issues in contract negotiation and roster construction rather than isolated bad bets. The C Contract Value Index (CVI) grade reflects a team paying closer to market rate for middling talent—neither catastrophically hamstrung like a franchise in full reset mode, nor nimble enough to maximize flexibility in a competitive conference. For a organization sitting at the bottom of the AFC South with two straight losses, this contract structure offers little margin for error; every veteran who underperforms becomes a dead-cap anchor, and the lack of high-value depth means trades or free agent pivots demand immediate cap sacrifice. The Titans' front office has backed itself into a corner where escaping this portfolio will require either surprising on-field performance or painful postseason roster surgery.
Tennessee Titans ranks 22nd of 32 graded teams by Contract Value Index. That slots them between the New York Giants (B-) just ahead and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
New York GiantsB-Philadelphia EaglesC+Los Angeles RamsC+Graded lower
Tampa Bay BuccaneersC-The Tennessee Titans roster ranks among the NFL's thinnest talent pools, with just one elite-caliber player anchoring a fundamentally bottom-heavy structure that offers little margin for error. Of the 23 graded players on the 27-man roster, only one qualifies as genuinely franchise-level, while just two others grade out as reliable starters — the kind of skeletal star power that correlates directly with their 3-14 record and current cellar positioning in the AFC South. The guard position group stands as the roster's only relative strength, but strength is relative when the overall talent base is this depleted. By contrast, the quarterback room is a critical vulnerability, lacking both the elite arm talent and proven stability that modern offenses demand, leaving the Titans perpetually behind the chains from snap one. The nine rotation-level contributors and 11 depth pieces tell the real story: this is a roster devoid of NFL quality at multiple positions, with no clear path to meaningful improvement without wholesale roster overhaul. With 91 days until the regular season, the Titans face either a sustained rebuild or a reset at the front office level — a 3-14 finish doesn't happen by accident, and piecemeal upgrades won't reverse a structural collapse of this magnitude.
# Tennessee Titans Team Sentiment Analysis The Tennessee Titans fanbase is overwhelmingly frustrated, with an F sentiment grade reflecting deep skepticism about the front office's direction and execution across the offseason. Of 33 total transactions, 16 drew mixed reactions and 14 landed as positively received, but those wins were drowned out by a three-move subset that crystallized fan concern—particularly the L'Jarius Sneed acquisition, which carries an F-tier grade and has become the lightning rod for criticism about overpaying for marginal upgrades on a 3-14 roster in desperate need of foundational overhaul. The one bright spot was the Garrett Dellinger signing at center, which earned genuine approval as a solid complementary piece, but a single well-graded move cannot salvage a broader narrative of front office missteps. With the regular season 91 days away, the Titans are caught between competing impulses: some fans see incremental tinkering as proof the organization refuses to commit to a proper rebuild, while others sense a lack of clarity on whether this is a win-now push or a teardown—and that ambiguity itself is driving sentiment downward. The volume of mixed reactions (16) relative to positive ones (14) suggests the fanbase is not angry so much as exhausted and unconvinced by the piecemeal approach. Until the Titans demonstrate a coherent strategic vision on the field, sentiment will remain in the basement.
Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.