
#93 DT · Arizona Cardinals
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'8"
Weight
315 lbs
Age
39
College
Miami
Draft
2008, Rd 2, #50
Experience
18 yrs
DT Rank
#4 / 218
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | Sacks | Tkl | TFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 278 | 117.0 | 960 | 138.5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 6.5 | 43 | 9.5 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 5.0 | 52 | 11.5 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 17 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$5.5M
Guaranteed
$4.3M
AAV
$5.5M/yr
The Cardinals struck gold by bringing back Calais Campbell on a one-year, $5.5M deal that earns a B+ CVI — this is borderline steal territory for a proven veteran. Campbell remains an above-average starter at defensive tackle despite his advanced age, and at $5.5M AAV, Arizona is paying well below market rate for his production level. The 37-year-old pass rusher defied Father Time last season and showed he still has enough in the tank to be a meaningful contributor, making this a savvy low-risk investment for a team that needed interior line help. The contract structure is perfectly crafted with $4.3M guaranteed on just a one-year commitment, giving the Cardinals maximum flexibility while securing a known commodity. Campbell's familiarity with the system and leadership presence adds intangible value that doesn't show up in the salary cap math, making this reunion a textbook example of veteran market efficiency. Arizona gets a reliable starter at a discount price, and if Campbell's age finally catches up to him, they're only committed for one season.
Calais Campbell remains one of the most remarkable stories in modern NFL history — a second-round pick out of Miami who has defied every conventional timeline for a defensive lineman, now in his 18th professional season at age 39 and still earning a B+ performance grade that most players half his age would envy. Across 278 career games, Campbell has built a résumé that belongs in serious Hall of Fame conversations, defined by pass-rush versatility, elite motor, and a physical durability that borders on supernatural. His current role with the Arizona Cardinals — the franchise where he first established himself as a foundational force — is that of a grizzled veteran anchor, asked to command double teams, collapse the pocket, and mentor a younger defensive front that is still learning what it means to play at an NFL level. Comparable in many ways to the late-career impact of Richard Seymour or Dwight Freeney, Campbell continues to produce meaningful football long after most of his contemporaries have walked away from the game. The numbers this season tell a quietly impressive story for a man approaching 40. Campbell is generating sacks at a rate of 0.38 per game, comfortably above the NFL average of 0.21 and pushing toward the elite threshold of 0.47 — a testament to his refined hand technique and relentless motor rather than any surviving burst of youth. His tackles-per-game mark of 2.53 sits right at the league average of 2.30, which is an honest reflection of a player who is no longer asked to chase sideline to sideline but remains impactful within his lane. Where Campbell still genuinely stands out is in tackles for loss, posting 0.56 per game against an NFL average of 0.35, confirming that his ability to disrupt behind the line of scrimmage — his calling card for nearly two decades — has not meaningfully eroded. The consistency across his most recent grades, holding steady at a B in both 2024 and 2025 after an A- in 2023, suggests a player managing his decline curve with exceptional professionalism rather than falling off a cliff. At 39, the trajectory naturally raises questions about sustainability, but Campbell has earned the benefit of every doubt — his career arc resembles that of a player who will simply decide when he is done rather than having the game make that decision for him. The one metric to monitor closely heading into a potential 19th season is whether his sacks-per-game rate can hold near that above-average threshold, because the moment interior pressure wanes, his overall value profile shifts significantly toward a symbolic role. For now, Campbell remains a legitimate contributor and a living proof of concept that elite conditioning and football IQ can extend a defensive lineman's productive
Calais Campbell's Contract Value Index (CVI) earns a B grade, reflecting the complex reality of evaluating a franchise legend whose career appears to be winding down. The media narrative around Campbell has evolved from celebrating his elite production to respectfully questioning whether he'll return for what would be a remarkable 19th season, with the veteran himself expressing surprise if 2025 isn't his final campaign. Despite his decorated resume featuring seven Pro Bowls, 117 career sacks, and the Walter Payton Man of the Year Award, the Cardinals' publicly stated "wait-and-see" approach signals an organization that deeply values Campbell but isn't actively building around him. Fan sentiment remains overwhelmingly positive, though it's increasingly framed in retrospective terms celebrating his legacy rather than anticipating future contributions. The dominant perception is one of respectful uncertainty—Campbell commands universal respect across the league, but the focus has shifted from on-field impact to retirement speculation. This creates a unique valuation scenario where his immense reputation and leadership value must be weighed against the reality that his career is in its final chapter, resulting in a solid but not elite grade that acknowledges both his continued worth and the natural decline that comes with being one of the NFL's elder statesmen.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 6.5 |
| 56 |
| 12.5 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 14 | 5.5 | 36 | 3.5 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 1.5 | 49 | 10.5 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 12 | 4.0 | 28 | 3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 6.5 | 56 | 6 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 10.5 | 72 | 14 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 14.5 | 67 | 6 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 8.0 | 53 | 7 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 5.0 | 61 | 11 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 14 | 7.0 | 58 | 9 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 9.0 | 58 | 8 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 13 | 6.5 | 63 | 8 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 16 | 8.0 | 72 | 7 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 15 | 6.0 | 60 | 7 |
| 2009 | ![]() | 16 | 7.0 | 48 | 3 |
| 2008 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 28 | 2 |
Updated Jan 1, 1970
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B
2025
(50% weight)
B
2024
(30% weight)
A-
2023
(20% weight)