
#80 WR · Tennessee Titans
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'1"
Weight
214 lbs
Age
26
College
Youngstown State
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
2 yrs
WR Rank
#207 / 295
Grade Bryce Oliver
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Bryce Oliver grades out as a shaky WR for Tennessee Titans (D+ Performance). That places him 207th of 295 graded wide receivers. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 13 | 7 | 103 | — |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 10 | 6 | 95 | 0 |
Updated May 21, 2026
Total Value
$1.1M
AAV
$1.1M/yr
Tennessee Titans got a C Contract Value Index out of the Bryce Oliver signing because the guaranteed money matches the production tier. Oliver's 2025 season output of 8 receiving yards across 3 games underscores why the Titans exercised an exclusive rights tender rather than committing significant cap resources—this is replacement-level production that warrants a depth-chart anchor, not a meaningful investment. At $1.075M AAV, the deal reflects accurate market pricing for a second-year receiver with minimal proven contributions, where the ERFA mechanism keeps him tethered to Tennessee without guaranteeing roster certainty. The mediaFraming is spot-on: Oliver remains a fringe roster candidate whose primary organizational value lies in special teams versatility and emergency depth, not offensive upside, which explains why five headlines treated the tender as routine business rather than newsworthy roster construction. Recent team moves—signings at defensive end, linebacker, and wide receiver depth—signal the Titans are evaluating at multiple positions in an evaluation phase, and Oliver will need to compete for a late-53-man spot despite his exclusive rights status. His contract carries zero cap risk and minimal dead-cap implications, making it an appropriate low-cost insurance policy for a player whose ceiling is clearly defined as a replacement-level depth piece who occasionally rotates into special teams packages.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Bryce's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Bryce Oliver delivers production that earns a D+ performance grade against WR comps. He's operating at replacement-level as a second-year wideout whose 2025 season output—8 receiving yards across 3 games—underscores his minimal offensive impact and precarious roster standing. His lone bright spot is a tackle on special teams, the only meaningful production marker that hints at his value to Tennessee's depth chart, though even that contribution is modest. Oliver's extremely limited snap opportunity and scant production output reflect both his developmental stage and the Titans' clear intention to use him as organizational filler rather than a reliable offensive contributor. The media framing is unambiguous: his exclusive rights tender was treated as routine roster maintenance, with five headlines treating his retention as procedural business for a practice squad receiver with zero leverage and minimal proven production. At 26 and two seasons into his career, Oliver remains a fringe roster candidate battling for a late-53-man spot—a special teams depth piece rather than a receiver who'll contribute meaningfully to Tennessee's passing game in the comeback window ahead.
Bryce Oliver ranks 207th of 295 graded wide receivers by performance. That slots Bryce between Jordan Watkins (D+) just ahead and Jaylin Noel (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Jordan WatkinsSan Francisco 49ersD+Cole BurgessPittsburgh SteelersD+Jalen BrooksArizona CardinalsD+Graded lower
Jaylin NoelHouston TexansBryce Oliver's C- sentiment grade reflects the muted public response to what most view as a routine roster management move by the Tennessee Titans. The media has framed Oliver as a low-risk depth acquisition—a practice squad receiver with minimal upside whose primary value lies in special teams versatility rather than offensive production. Coverage of his ERFA tender was largely procedural, with five headlines treating it as standard business for an unproven wideout who'll likely shuttle between the practice squad and active roster as emergency depth. Fans have barely registered this move, viewing Oliver as organizational filler rather than a legitimate contributor to the Titans' receiving corps. The lukewarm reception suggests expectations are appropriately calibrated for a player whose ceiling appears to be that of a replacement-level depth piece. His special teams skills provide the only meaningful differentiator that could help him stick on the roster, though even that hasn't generated any notable enthusiasm from Tennessee's fanbase.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Bryce Oliver is a player in his 2nd NFL season listed at WR for the Tennessee Titans. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Bryce Oliver, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance D+, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.