
Western Conference · Southwest Division
GM: David Griffin
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
18
Players
6
Transactions
18
Contracts Graded
*(15 active roster + 2 two-way contracts)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the New Orleans Pelicans the same way it covers every NBA franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the New Orleans Pelicans, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance F, Sentiment F. Front office leadership: David Griffin.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 18 of 18 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The NBA team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the New Orleans Pelicans
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the Contract Value Index, New Orleans Pelicans is spending roughly in line with the market (C- Contract Value Index). That ranks 22nd of 30 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a roster among the league’s thinnest (F Performance). The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal.
The New Orleans Pelicans' roster construction earns a C- Contract Value Index (CVI), a reflection of a portfolio weighted heavily toward overpayment rather than smart value accumulation. Of their 18 rostered players, just six occupy genuinely good-value deals—a 33 percent hit rate that's frankly unsustainable—while eight contracts qualify as outright overpays, leaving the front office with minimal financial flexibility as the team sits at 26-56 and effectively out of contention with the Finals days away. The remaining four deals occupy middle ground, neither creating nor destroying value, but that middle class is too thin to offset the damage: a 44 percent overpay ratio suffocates the salary cap and prevents the team from making meaningful mid-season adjustments or preserving cap space for future moves. The best-value positions likely anchor a young core or fill role-player depth at below-market rates, but they're drowning in a sea of contracts that paid veterans more than their production justified—a classic symptom of reaching for playoffs in past seasons without the supporting cast to justify the investment. The overpayment cluster suggests either aging contracts that declined faster than projected, or speculative signings that never panned out, leaving the Pelicans cap-constrained heading into a critical offseason. With nearly half their roster locked into unfavorable terms, this team lacks the financial runway to pivot toward a rebuild or reload around any potential franchise centerpieces. The CVI grade is punitive because it reflects not just current year pain, but the front office's inability to construct a modern, flexible roster—a structural problem that deepens with every passing season at 26-56.
# New Orleans Pelicans Team Performance Analysis The Pelicans are a lottery-bound roster with a structurally broken foundation and no realistic path to contention. With zero All-Star caliber players, just two quality starters anchoring a 18-man roster, and a 26-56 record that places them outside the playoff picture entirely, New Orleans is operating well below the threshold for competitive viability—a reality underscored by a 1-9 stretch over their last 10 games and a brutal 9-32 road record. The team's composition reveals a top-heavy imbalance masked by sheer depth: six rotation players and ten depth pieces cannot compensate for the absence of franchise-level talent at the guard or wing positions, leaving the two starters to carry an unsustainable offensive and defensive load. Positionally, the Pelicans lack a clear strength; with no All-Stars in the fold, even their best units are middle-of-the-pack role-player clusters rather than reliable anchors. On the flip side, nearly every position class qualifies as a weakness—the lack of perimeter creation, three-level scoring depth, and defensive versatility is acute across the rotation. With the NBA Finals four days away and New Orleans staring at a 26-56 finish, they are squarely in a rebuild or teardown phase, not a development window with upside; four transactions in-season suggest organizational instability rather than a coherent construction plan. The outlook is grim absent major offseason intervention: lottery luck, a high-impact draft pick, and ruthless roster surgery will be required to even approach contention, and that timeline is years away, not seasons.
The New Orleans Pelicans' front office moves have landed like a lead balloon in the court of public opinion, earning an F sentiment grade that reflects genuine frustration across the fanbase and media. Of four transactions this season, just one—the Bryce McGowens acquisition—registered as a positive reception and earned a B-grade valuation, suggesting a sliver of optimism around adding a young wing asset; meanwhile, a single move drew mixed reactions, but two transactions drew outright criticism, with the Dalen Terry deal hitting rock bottom and graded an F, signaling a consensus view that the front office botched that particular move. The Pelicans' 26-56 record and plummeting form (1-9 in their last ten, 9-32 on the road) have turned every roster move into a referendum on organizational direction, and the negative-to-positive transaction ratio of 2-to-1 reflects a fanbase convinced that management is making the wrong bets at the worst possible time. The pattern is unambiguously downward: three of four moves either failed to inspire confidence or actively dismayed observers, suggesting that neither deadline acquisitions nor roster tweaks are resonating as meaningful steps toward a competitive reset. With the playoffs four days away and the Pelicans stuck at #11 seed in the Western Conference, sentiment around the front office has crystallized into skepticism—fans and analysts alike are questioning whether this roster is built for anything other than another prolonged rebuild.
New Orleans Pelicans ranks 22nd of 30 graded teams by Contract Value Index. That slots them between the Orlando Magic (C+) just ahead and the Brooklyn Nets (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Orlando MagicC+Chicago BullsCUtah JazzCGraded lower
Brooklyn NetsD+Golden State WarriorsD+Philadelphia SixersD+Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.