
#27PG · Portland Trail Blazers
Height
6'8"
Weight
195 lbs
Age
25
Experience
4 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 202 | 8.6 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 44.8% | 39.3% | 75.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 64 | 8.6 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/29 | @ SAS | L 95-114 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | +1 |
| Sun, 4/26 | vs SAS | L 93-114 | 2 | 0 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$5.0M
Guaranteed
$5.0M
AAV
$1.7M/yr
The Portland Trail Blazers struck gold with Vit Krejci's $1.7M AAV deal, earning a solid B on the Contract Value Index (CVI) despite his C- performance grade. While Krejci's on-court production sits below league average for a point guard, his minimal salary represents exceptional value in today's inflated market where even replacement-level guards command $3-5M annually. The three-year structure gives Portland flexibility while locking in a cost-controlled asset who could develop into a reliable backup or serve as valuable trade fodder. At just $1.7M per season, the Blazers are essentially paying G-League money for an NBA-ready point guard with upside, creating massive profit potential if Krejci's game improves even marginally. This contract exemplifies smart roster construction — minimal downside risk with legitimate upside that could pay dividends as Portland navigates their rebuild.
Vit Krejci earns a C- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA point guards this season. Through 202 games, Vit is contributing 8.6 points, 2.3 rebounds, and 1.6 assists per game in his role. Vit's best relative area is FG% at 44.8, though it still falls below the point guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.6 (point guard median: 4.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Vit ranks 51st.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.7 |
| 0.3 |
| 44.8% |
| 39.1% |
| 74.5% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 57 | 7.2 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 49.7% | 43.7% | 71.1% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 22 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 49.0% | 41.2% | 83.3% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 29 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 40.5% | 23.8% | 50.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 30 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 40.7% | 32.7% | 86.4% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-0 |
| 0-0 |
| -2 |
| Sat, 4/25 | vs SAS | L 108-120 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 |
| Mon, 4/20 | @ SAS | L 98-111 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs SAC | W 122-110 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 | +2 |
Vit Krejci's public standing sits at a B- sentiment grade — cautiously positive but beginning to cool, a reflection of a narrative that was built on trade optimism and has since collided with the realities of a C- performance grade through 64 games in the 2025-26 season. The initial media reception surrounding his acquisition from Atlanta was genuinely enthusiastic, with analysts framing the deal as a value win for Portland, characterizing Krejci as the centerpiece of the exchange rather than an ancillary piece and suggesting that suppressed opportunity in Atlanta — not a ceiling problem — explained his limited production to that point. That pre-season goodwill has been the primary support beam for his reputation, because his 2025-26 numbers — 8.6 PPG, 2.3 RPG, and 1.6 APG across 64 games — are the output of a solid rotation piece, not the breakout that would validate the "genius deal" framing some coverage embraced at the time of the trade. With Portland sitting at 42-40 as the No. 7 seed in the West and the playoffs looming, the franchise is no longer in a pure developmental posture, which raises the stakes for Krejci to contribute meaningfully rather than simply log minutes. Recent roster movement — including the signings of Chris Youngblood and Jayson Kent alongside Sidy Cissoko's extension — suggests the organization is actively managing depth, and that kind of roster churn can subtly shift perception around fringe contributors like Krejci, making it harder for him to own a clearly defined role in the public eye. The bottom line is that Krejci remains viewed as a legitimate rotation asset with legitimate upside, but the gap between the trade hype and his current production line is wide enough that sentiment has trended from an A- down to a B-, and without a postseason moment to point to, that drift is more likely to continue than reverse.