
#32C · Toronto Raptors
Height
6'9"
Weight
245 lbs
Age
26
College
Indiana
Experience
2 yrs
Wingspan
7'1.0"
Reach
8'10.0"
Hand Size
9.25" × 10.75"
Grade Trayce Jackson-Davis
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Trayce Jackson-Davis grades out as a middling C for Toronto Raptors (C+ Impact). That places him 60th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 175 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 56.5% | 20.0% | 56.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 47 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 0.8 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 47 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 56.5% | F F |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 9 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 88.9% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 68 | 7.9 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 70.2% | C C |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 5/3 | @ CLE | L 102-114 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Fri, 4/24 | vs CLE | W 126-104 | 2 | 0 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$4.6M
Guaranteed
$4.6M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Trayce Jackson-Davis's contract with the Toronto Raptors earns a C+ CVI — roughly what you'd expect for this level of production and salary. Trayce's production is currently below the league median for centers, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $2.3M average annual value ranks as minimum-level money for the center market. The production lines up closely with the price tag, which is essentially paying fair market value. At 26, Trayce is entering his prime window — historically when centers post their best numbers. The 2-year deal keeps the commitment short, giving the team financial flexibility to move on if performance drops.
Trayce Jackson-Davis earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 175 games, Trayce is contributing 3.6 points, 2.9 rebounds, and 0.8 assists per game in his role. Trayce's strongest area is FG% at 56.5, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.8 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Trayce ranks 60th.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Trayce's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Trayce Jackson-Davis ranks 60th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Trayce between Andre Drummond (D+) just ahead and Jaxson Hayes (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Andre DrummondPhiladelphia SixersD+Kelly OlynykSan Antonio SpursD+Kyle FilipowskiUtah JazzD+Graded lower
Jaxson HayesLos Angeles LakersAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Trayce Jackson-Davis is a player in his 2nd NBA season listed at C for the Toronto Raptors. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Trayce Jackson-Davis, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance D+, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.3 |
| 0.5 |
| 56.5% |
| 100.0% |
| 51.4% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 9 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 88.9% | 0.0% | 38.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 68 | 7.9 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 70.2% | 0.0% | 56.1% |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-1 |
| 0-0 |
| -3 |
| Sat, 4/18 | @ CLE | L 113-126 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | +2 |
| Sun, 4/12 | vs BKN | W 136-101 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | +5 |
Coverage volume around Trayce Jackson-Davis produces a B sentiment grade in the current window. The narrative anchoring this positive reception is rooted almost entirely in the acquisition itself—media consensus frames the Raptors' trade-deadline move as a shrewd low-risk reclamation project that exposed potential underutilization in Golden State, with headlines celebrating the move as validated by his "impressive" debut efficiency. Yet there's an undeniable disconnect: his 2025-26 season line of 3.6 PPG and 2.9 RPG across 47 games is unambiguously replacement-level production, and the B sentiment grade rides almost entirely on goodwill from the low acquisition cost rather than on-court substance matching his D+ performance grade. Toronto's active roster churn—signing Markelle Fultz in late March and cycling through guards like Tyreke Key—has paradoxically insulated Jackson-Davis by keeping spotlight expectations manageable, allowing the narrative to remain anchored in potential rather than immediate proof. The real test arrives now: with the Raptors at 46-36 and the No. 5 seed just days away from the playoffs, postseason minutes will either validate the cheap-acquisition narrative or expose it as borrowed goodwill, and sentiment will curdle quickly if he doesn't earn consistent rotation minutes when stakes matter most.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.