
#3C · Cleveland Cavaliers
Height
6'9"
Weight
248 lbs
Age
28
College
Indiana
Experience
8 yrs
Wingspan
7'6.0"
Reach
9'4.5"
Hand Size
9.5" × 10.25"
Grade Thomas Bryant
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Thomas Bryant grades out as a strong C for Cleveland Cavaliers (B Impact). That places him 89th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 386 | 6.0 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 50.2% | 34.6% | 78.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 54 | 6.0 | 3.1 | 0.6 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 54 | 6.0 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 50.2% | D- D- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 20 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 48.5% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 2 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 71.4% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | F F |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 27 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 52.0% | D D |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 10 | 14.3 | 6.1 | 1.5 | 64.8% | C+ C+ |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 46 | 13.2 | 7.2 | 1.8 | 58.1% | B- B- |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 72 | 10.5 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 61.6% | C+ C+ |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 15 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 38.1% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 5/26 | vs NYK | L 93-130 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-5 | -4 |
| Fri, 5/22 | @ NYK | L 93-109 | 1 | 0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Thomas Bryant earns a D+ Contract Value Index (CVI), a grade that reflects the fundamental mismatch between his $2.3M salary and his D-minus performance profile during the 2025–26 season. Averaging 6.0 points and 3.1 rebounds across 54 games, Bryant is operating as a pure depth center—efficient in spot minutes but lacking the volume or impact to justify a premium allocation of roster resources. At $2.3M AAV, his one-year deal sits at the comfortable end of the backup center market, which is precisely the problem: the Cavaliers are paying veteran-rate money for a reserve whose minimal statistical output (0.6 assists per game) and limited playing time suggest he occupies a situational rather than foundational role. At 28 years old with nine seasons of NBA experience, Bryant is an established veteran whose window for upside is effectively closed, meaning the organization is paying for floor-spacing and rim-running consistency rather than growth or playoff leverage. The media narrative—respectable but cooling, anchored in efficiency metrics and team-wide impact rather than individual star power—aligns with his actual contract reality: he's a competent, low-profile reserve valued quietly by coaching staffs but unlikely to generate meaningful cap savings or trade interest. With only one year remaining on the deal, the CVI downgrade reflects not a looming cap crisis but the straightforward reality that a $2.3M depth piece producing this volume of production represents modest value in an era of modern NBA salary inflation.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Thomas's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Thomas Bryant ranks 89th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Thomas between Brook Lopez (D-) just ahead and Jay Huff (D-) just behind.
Graded higher
Brook LopezLos Angeles ClippersD-Branden CarlsonOklahoma City ThunderD-Adem BonaPhiladelphia SixersD-Graded lower
Jay HuffIndiana PacersNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Thomas Bryant is a veteran in his 8th NBA season listed at C for the Cleveland Cavaliers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Thomas Bryant, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D+, Performance D-, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.3 |
| 0.4 |
| 50.2% |
| 34.8% |
| 81.3% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 20 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 48.5% | 50.0% | 78.6% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 2 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 71.4% | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 27 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 52.0% | 28.6% | 87.5% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 10 | 14.3 | 6.1 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 64.8% | 42.9% | 66.7% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 46 | 13.2 | 7.2 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 58.1% | 40.7% | 74.1% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 72 | 10.5 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 61.6% | 33.3% | 78.1% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 15 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 38.1% | 10.0% | 55.6% |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-1 |
| 0-0 |
| +2 |
| Mon, 5/18 | @ DET | W 125-94 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-2 | +1 |
| Fri, 5/15 | vs DET | L 94-115 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0 |
| Tue, 5/12 | vs DET | W 112-103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -4 |
Thomas Bryant earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 386 games, Thomas is contributing 6.0 points, 3.1 rebounds, and 0.6 assists per game in his role. Thomas's strongest area is FG% at 50.2, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.6 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Thomas ranks 89th.
Thomas Bryant's public perception sits at a C — respectable enough for a backup center, but notably cooling off from the stronger narrative standing he held just a month ago. The most compelling driver of his current reputation is a niche but genuine analytical appreciation: his career field goal percentage north of 57 percent and a PER of 17.2 have earned him quiet credibility among the efficiency-focused crowd, and a recent feature spotlighting his winning impact on the Cavaliers reinforces the idea that coaching staffs value him well beyond what the box score suggests. The disconnect between that soft-positive media framing and his D-level performance grade is the central tension here — in 54 games during the 2025-26 season, Bryant is averaging 6.0 points and 3.1 rebounds, which is exactly the kind of modest output that keeps him in the "reliable depth piece" conversation rather than the "difference-maker" one. The recent headlines trending around Cleveland are more team-oriented than Bryant-specific — a notable loss to Miami and roster-level housekeeping moves like the signing and subsequent release of Darius Brown signal a front office managing the margins of a 52-30 playoff roster rather than making bold statements about its core identity. With the Cavaliers locked into the No. 4 seed in the East heading toward a postseason push, Bryant's narrative will ultimately be defined by whether his efficiency and locker-room value translate when the stakes are highest — and right now, the public is mildly interested but far from convinced.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.