
#30PF · Boston Celtics
Height
6'7"
Weight
217 lbs
Age
28
College
Virginia
Experience
4 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.3"
Reach
8'6.0"
Hand Size
8.25" × 9"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 323 | 8.9 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 40.4% | 41.0% | 86.9% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 68 | 8.9 | 3.9 | 1.5 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 5/2 | vs PHI | L 100-109 | 30 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 3-6 | -3 |
| Fri, 5/1 | @ PHI | L 93-106 | 21 | 5 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$45.0M
Guaranteed
$20.9M
AAV
$10.0M/yr
Sam Hauser's four-year, $10.0M AAV extension with the Boston Celtics represents one of the most questionable resource allocations in recent NBA history, earning a dismal F grade from our Contract Value Index (CVI). The Celtics committed $40 million total to a player delivering replacement-level production, with Hauser's D-grade performance metrics revealing significant limitations as a rotation piece on a championship-caliber roster. While Hauser provides some three-point shooting utility, paying $10 million annually for a player who struggles defensively and offers minimal versatility is a substantial overpay in today's market. Comparable role players with similar or superior skill sets typically command $3-6 million per year, making this deal a prime example of how teams can get caught up in their own player development narratives. The Celtics essentially paid franchise-caliber money for what amounts to a middling bench contributor, creating a contract that will likely hinder their future roster flexibility. This extension suggests poor market evaluation by Boston's front office, as they could have secured similar or better production through minimum contracts or mid-level exceptions. Hauser's F-grade CVI reflects the massive disconnect between his actual impact and the financial commitment he received.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.5 |
| 0.3 |
| 40.4% |
| 38.1% |
| 92.9% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 8 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 41.7% | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 19 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 42.9% | 38.0% | 100.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 15 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 34.5% | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 7 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.0% | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| 4 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 2-6 |
| 1-5 |
| -12 |
| Tue, 4/28 | vs PHI | L 97-113 | 20 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-5 | -21 |
| Sun, 4/26 | @ PHI | W 128-96 | 22 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-8 | 2-6 | +13 |
| Fri, 4/24 | @ PHI | W 108-100 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-2 | -6 |
| Tue, 4/21 | vs PHI | L 97-111 | 25 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-8 | -2 |
| Sun, 4/19 | vs PHI | W 123-91 | 28 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4-6 | 4-6 | +14 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs NOP | W 144-118 | 28 | 24 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8-13 | 8-12 | +21 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ NYK | L 106-112 | 31 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 2-6 | +1 |
Sam Hauser earns a D Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 323 games, Sam is contributing 8.9 points, 3.9 rebounds, and 1.5 assists per game in his role. Sam's best relative area is FG% at 40.4, though it still falls below the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.5 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Sam ranks 70th.
Sam Hauser's public standing sits comfortably in positive territory heading into the playoffs, with a sentiment grade of B+ that reflects a media environment far more enthusiastic about his role than his raw production numbers alone would suggest. The driving narrative is a genuine reframing of Hauser from complementary piece to legitimate offensive weapon — coverage has zeroed in on his three-point shooting, his value as a floor-spacer, and a headline-grabbing performance against Atlanta that reportedly made NBA history, all of which have contributed to a bullish media posture that characterizes him as quietly underappreciated relative to his contract. That disconnect becomes pointed when you factor in his performance grade of D, which tells a different story — through 68 games in the 2025-26 season, Hauser is averaging 8.9 points, 3.9 rebounds, and 1.5 assists per game, numbers that are workable for a role player but hard to reconcile with the "offensive weapon" framing that has taken hold in recent weeks. The pairing with Neemias Queta has generated real analytical interest, with coverage suggesting the two are creating frontcourt matchup problems that benefit the broader Boston system, which adds a team-context layer to his perception that pure individual stats cannot capture. Boston's recent roster decisions — including rest-of-season and 10-day signings at the margins — signal a front office filling depth rather than reshaping the core, which keeps Hauser's role stable and his standing in the rotation unchallenged entering the postseason. It is also worth noting that sentiment has been cooling in the last 30 days, sliding from A to B+, and recent reports of a missed start suggest the performance-grade concerns may be beginning to bleed into the broader narrative. The bottom line: Hauser's public perception is riding a wave of creative media framing and legitimate team-fit arguments, but with the playoffs underway and performance concerns mounting, that sentiment cushion could erode quickly if his production does not keep pace with the hype.