
#30PF · Boston Celtics
Height
6'7"
Weight
217 lbs
Age
28
College
Virginia
Experience
4 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.3"
Reach
8'6.0"
Hand Size
8.25" × 9"
Grade Sam Hauser
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Sam Hauser grades out as a strong PF for Boston Celtics (B Impact). That places him 78th of 84 graded power forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is poor (F Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a significant overpay (F), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 323 | 8.9 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 40.4% | 41.0% | 86.9% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 68 | 8.9 | 3.9 | 1.5 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 68 | 8.9 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 40.4% | D D |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 8 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 41.7% | D- D- |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 19 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 42.9% | D D |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 15 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 34.5% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 5/2 | vs PHI | L 100-109 | 30 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 3-6 | -3 |
| Fri, 5/1 | @ PHI | L 93-106 | 21 | 5 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$45.0M
Guaranteed
$20.9M
AAV
$10.0M/yr
Sam Hauser's contract with the Boston Celtics is graded as a F CVI. At $10.0M per year, the team is currently paying more than the on-court production warrants — a gap that needs to close for this deal to work out. Sam's production is currently below the league median for power forwards, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $10.0M average annual value ranks as role player money for the power forward market. The concern here is the gap between production and cost — the team is paying a premium above the player's on-court value. At 28, Sam is in his prime productive window — exactly when teams want their highest-paid players performing at their peak. The 4-year contract represents a moderate investment with room to exit if needed.
Sam Hauser earns a F Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 323 games, Sam is contributing 8.9 points, 3.9 rebounds, and 1.5 assists per game in his role. Sam's best relative area is FG% at 40.4, though it still falls below the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.5 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Sam ranks 78th.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Sam's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Sam Hauser ranks 78th of 84 graded power forwards by performance. That slots Sam between Zeke Nnaji (F) just ahead and Quinten Post (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Zeke NnajiDenver NuggetsFGui SantosGolden State WarriorsFNae'Qwan TomlinCleveland CavaliersFGraded lower
Quinten PostGolden State WarriorsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Sam Hauser is a player in his 4th NBA season listed at PF for the Boston Celtics. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Sam Hauser, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance F, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.5 |
| 0.3 |
| 40.4% |
| 38.1% |
| 92.9% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 8 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 41.7% | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 19 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 42.9% | 38.0% | 100.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 15 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 34.5% | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 7 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.0% | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| 4 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 2-6 |
| 1-5 |
| -12 |
| Tue, 4/28 | vs PHI | L 97-113 | 20 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-5 | -21 |
| Sun, 4/26 | @ PHI | W 128-96 | 22 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-8 | 2-6 | +13 |
| Fri, 4/24 | @ PHI | W 108-100 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-2 | -6 |
| Tue, 4/21 | vs PHI | L 97-111 | 25 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-8 | -2 |
| Sun, 4/19 | vs PHI | W 123-91 | 28 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4-6 | 4-6 | +14 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs NOP | W 144-118 | 28 | 24 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8-13 | 8-12 | +21 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ NYK | L 106-112 | 31 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 2-6 | +1 |
Sam Hauser's public standing sits comfortably in positive territory heading into the playoffs, with a sentiment grade of B+ that reflects a media environment far more enthusiastic about his role than his raw production numbers alone would suggest. The driving narrative is a genuine reframing of Hauser from complementary piece to legitimate offensive weapon — coverage has zeroed in on his three-point shooting, his value as a floor-spacer, and a headline-grabbing performance against Atlanta that reportedly made NBA history, all of which have contributed to a bullish media posture that characterizes him as quietly underappreciated relative to his contract. That disconnect becomes pointed when you factor in his performance grade of D, which tells a different story — through 68 games in the 2025-26 season, Hauser is averaging 8.9 points, 3.9 rebounds, and 1.5 assists per game, numbers that are workable for a role player but hard to reconcile with the "offensive weapon" framing that has taken hold in recent weeks. The pairing with Neemias Queta has generated real analytical interest, with coverage suggesting the two are creating frontcourt matchup problems that benefit the broader Boston system, which adds a team-context layer to his perception that pure individual stats cannot capture. Boston's recent roster decisions — including rest-of-season and 10-day signings at the margins — signal a front office filling depth rather than reshaping the core, which keeps Hauser's role stable and his standing in the rotation unchallenged entering the postseason. It is also worth noting that sentiment has been cooling in the last 30 days, sliding from A to B+, and recent reports of a missed start suggest the performance-grade concerns may be beginning to bleed into the broader narrative. The bottom line: Hauser's public perception is riding a wave of creative media framing and legitimate team-fit arguments, but with the playoffs underway and performance concerns mounting, that sentiment cushion could erode quickly if his production does not keep pace with the hype.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.