
#35C · Portland Trail Blazers
Height
6'9"
Weight
249 lbs
Age
28
College
Texas A&M
Experience
7 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 284 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 72.0% | 29.6% | 67.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 50 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 1.0 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/29 | @ SAS | L 95-114 | 17 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5-10 | 1-3 | -4 |
| Sun, 4/26 | vs SAS | L 93-114 | 26 | 4 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$13.3M
Guaranteed
$13.3M
AAV
$13.3M/yr
Robert Williams III's one-year, $13.3M AAV deal with the Portland Trail Blazers represents a classic "prove-it" contract that lands squarely in middling territory with a C- Contract Value Index (CVI) grade. While Williams possesses elite shot-blocking instincts and rim-running ability when healthy, his performance grade of B- reflects the glaring reality that availability has been his Achilles' heel throughout his career. The Blazers are essentially betting $13.3 million on a player who has struggled to stay on the court consistently, making this a high-risk, moderate-reward proposition for a franchise-caliber talent trapped in a replacement-level body from a durability standpoint. At this price point, Portland needed either a healthier track record or a more significant discount to justify the investment. The short-term nature of the deal provides an escape hatch, but paying above-average starter money for someone with Williams' injury concerns feels like an overpay in today's market. This contract screams desperation move rather than savvy value play, which explains why the CVI reflects skepticism about the risk-reward calculation.
Robert Williams III earns a B- Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level center putting up solid numbers for the Portland Trail Blazers. Through 284 games, Robert is contributing 6.8 points, 7.0 rebounds, and 1.0 assists per game in his role. Robert's strongest area is FG% at 72.0, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.0 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Robert ranks 25th. Robert is a reliable contributor who the Portland Trail Blazers can count on game to game.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.6 |
| 1.5 |
| 72.0% |
| 33.3% |
| 62.8% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 20 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 64.1% | 33.3% | 88.2% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 6 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 65.4% | 0.0% | 77.8% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 20 | 7.7 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 78.8% | 0.0% | 67.9% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 17 | 7.7 | 6.2 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 67.9% | 0.0% | 89.3% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 3 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 64.3% | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 13 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 74.2% | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 3 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 6 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 2-4 |
| 0-0 |
| +3 |
| Sat, 4/25 | vs SAS | L 108-120 | 25 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-1 | -11 |
| Wed, 4/22 | @ SAS | W 106-103 | 23 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5-6 | 1-2 | +13 |
| Mon, 4/20 | @ SAS | L 98-111 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5-7 | 1-3 | +3 |
| Wed, 4/15 | @ PHX | W 114-110 | 16 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-6 | 0-1 | -14 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs SAC | W 122-110 | 23 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | +7 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs LAC | W 116-97 | 18 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-2 | +25 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ SAS | L 101-112 | 13 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | -11 |
| Tue, 4/7 | @ DEN | L 132-137 | 23 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0 |
Public sentiment around Robert Williams III has stabilized at a cautious B- heading into the playoff stretch, reflecting a fanbase and media corps that respects his talent without fully trusting his body to hold up when it matters most. The defining narrative is one of earned credibility undercut by a chronic question mark — his All-Defensive Second Team recognition from 2022 remains the ceiling reference point that reporters and analysts keep circling back to, but persistent knee concerns have turned every availability update into its own news cycle, as evidenced by injury report headlines tracking his status against the Mavericks and 76ers alike. That sentiment grade aligns neatly with his B- performance grade in the 2025-26 season, where his 6.8 PPG, 7.0 RPG, and 1.0 APG across 50 games paint a picture of a solid, functional contributor rather than a difference-maker — the kind of production that justifies his $13.3M AAV without inspiring the conviction that he is an irreplaceable piece of a playoff rotation. The most telling perception shift, however, comes from a "replacement hiding in the draft" narrative that has surfaced in recent coverage — the sort of framing that signals Portland's front office and the broader media are already stress-testing contingency plans, a read that is reinforced by the organization's recent activity adding perimeter depth through signings rather than doubling down on frontcourt infrastructure. With the Blazers sitting at 42-40 as the No. 7 seed in the West and riding a two-game win streak into the postseason, Williams finds himself in an interesting spot: the performance trend is moving upward and the sentiment has recovered sharply from its low point over the last month, but the draft-centered replacement chatter is a real ceiling on how high his standing can climb until he proves he can be durable when playoff minutes get harder and rosters get shorter.