
#7PG · Chicago Bulls
Height
6'2"
Weight
175 lbs
Age
21
College
Kentucky
Experience
1 yrs
Grade Rob Dillingham
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Rob Dillingham grades out as a poor PG for Chicago Bulls (F Impact). That places him 87th of 93 graded point guards. In his on-court role, the grade is poor (F Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at F, a significant overpay. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a pro, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 102 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 37.7% | 32.9% | 68.6% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 54 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 54 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 37.7% | D- D- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | @ DAL | L 128-149 | 30 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 11-18 | 1-5 | -19 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs ORL | L 103-127 | 27 | 13 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$22.2M
Guaranteed
$13.5M
AAV
$6.6M/yr
Rob Dillingham's contract with the Chicago Bulls is graded as a F CVI. At $6.6M per year, the team is currently paying more than the on-court production warrants — a gap that needs to close for this deal to work out. Rob's production is currently below the league median for point guards, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $6.6M average annual value ranks as role player money for the point guard market. The concern here is the gap between production and cost — the team is paying a premium above the player's on-court value. At 21, Rob has years of development ahead, which adds significant upside to this contract. The 3-year contract represents a moderate investment with room to exit if needed.
Rob Dillingham earns a F Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA point guards this season. Through 102 games, Rob is contributing 5.3 points, 1.8 rebounds, and 2.2 assists per game in his role. Rob's best relative area is FG% at 37.7, though it still falls below the point guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 5.3 (point guard median: 15.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Rob ranks 87th. At 21, Rob is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Chicago Bulls.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Rob's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Rob Dillingham ranks 87th of 93 graded point guards by performance. That slots Rob between Quenton Jackson (F) just ahead and De'Anthony Melton (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Quenton JacksonIndiana PacersFRyan NembhardDallas MavericksFAaron HolidayHouston RocketsFGraded lower
De'Anthony MeltonGolden State WarriorsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Rob Dillingham is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at PG for the Chicago Bulls. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Rob Dillingham, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance F, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.7 |
| 0.1 |
| 37.7% |
| 32.6% |
| 75.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 3 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.5% | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 4-11 |
| 1-5 |
| -7 |
| Sun, 4/5 | vs PHX | L 110-120 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-4 | -4 |
| Fri, 4/3 | @ NYK | L 96-136 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 | -7 |
Rob Dillingham's public perception scores a C- sentiment grade as NBA media and fan tone converge. The dominant narrative centers on a redemption arc — coverage across credible outlets frames him as a player who never received a fair opportunity in Minnesota, now handed a genuine developmental pathway in Chicago following his mid-season trade in early February. Media coverage has leaned optimistic about his situation, with analysts contextualizing his minor surgical procedure as addressing a lingering health concern rather than raising durability questions, and the Bulls' decision to absorb Leonard Miller and four second-round picks signaling organizational commitment to a youth-movement swing. However, the gap between narrative promise and on-court output remains wide: his 2025-26 season line of 5.3 PPG, 1.8 RPG, and 2.2 APG across 54 games paints the statistical profile of a developmental piece, not a rotation contributor, and his F performance grade confirms that potential hasn't yet translated to proof. The most recent legitimizing storyline — chatter about his last five games serving as trade-deadline leverage — has injected real stakes into what could have been a forgettable audition on a 31-51 team with no playoff positioning, but with sentiment cooling from B- to C- over the past month, the fanbase and media are rightfully demanding results, not just circumstance. The story remains alive, but it is decidedly on probation: institutional backing exists, the opportunity is real, and the framing is sympathetic, but Dillingham needs to close the gap between the redemption narrative and actual NBA impact.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.