
#7PG · Chicago Bulls
Height
6'2"
Weight
175 lbs
Age
21
College
Kentucky
Experience
1 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 102 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 37.7% | 32.9% | 68.6% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 54 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | @ DAL | L 128-149 | 30 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 11-18 | 1-5 | -19 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs ORL | L 103-127 | 27 | 13 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$22.2M
Guaranteed
$13.5M
AAV
$6.6M/yr
Rob Dillingham's 3-year, $6.6M AAV rookie deal with the Chicago Bulls earns a C- Contract Value Index (CVI) grade, reflecting modest concerns about immediate value delivery relative to his draft position expectations. While the point guard's contract represents standard rookie scale compensation that limits financial downside, his C performance grade suggests he's currently operating as a below-average contributor at the NBA level. At $6.6M annually, the Bulls are paying solid starter money for a player who has yet to demonstrate consistent impact on winning basketball, creating a slight value gap that pushes his CVI into negative territory. Dillingham's youth and development potential provide some upside protection for the contract, but his current production metrics indicate the franchise may need to exercise patience before seeing returns on this investment. The C- grade reflects a player whose on-court contributions aren't quite matching his financial commitment, though the manageable AAV keeps this from becoming a significant organizational burden. For a rebuilding Bulls team, this represents a reasonable bet on upside that currently leans slightly unfavorable from a pure value standpoint.
Rob Dillingham earns a C Performance grade — solid for a sophomore, with room to grow into a larger role. Through 102 games, Rob is contributing 5.3 points, 1.8 rebounds, and 2.2 assists per game in his role. Rob's best relative area is FG% at 37.7, though it still falls below the point guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 5.3 (point guard median: 15.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Rob ranks 46th. At 21, Rob is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Chicago Bulls.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.7 |
| 0.1 |
| 37.7% |
| 32.6% |
| 75.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 3 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.5% | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 4-11 |
| 1-5 |
| -7 |
| Sun, 4/5 | vs PHX | L 110-120 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-4 | -4 |
| Fri, 4/3 | @ NYK | L 96-136 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 | -7 |
Rob Dillingham's public perception sits at a cautious C right now — not toxic, but hardly buzzing with conviction, and trending in the wrong direction as the Bulls limp toward the end of a 31-51 season with no playoff stakes to rally around. The driving force behind his narrative is a compelling redemption arc: his tenure in Minnesota was widely characterized as wasted potential, and the Chicago trade in early February reframed him as a reclamation project worth watching, with credible NBA media asking whether the Bulls will finally unlock what Minnesota never did. His actual production tells a more grounded story — posting 5.3 PPG, 1.8 RPG, and 2.2 APG across 54 games in the 2025-26 season is the statistical profile of a developmental piece, not a rotation anchor, and his C performance grade confirms the gap between narrative and on-court output hasn't closed yet. That said, the recent chatter about his last five games serving as leverage at the trade deadline is the most legitimizing storyline he's had, injecting a sense of real stakes into what could have been a forgettable stretch-run audition on a bottom-12 team. The front office's decision to also absorb Leonard Miller and four second-round picks in the same trade signals this was a deliberate youth-movement swing rather than a throwaway deal, which lends Dillingham some institutional backing. Still, with the sentiment grade cooling from a B- to a C over the past 30 days, the fanbase and media are watching closely — the story is still alive, but it needs proof, not just promise.