
#29PG · Indiana Pacers
Height
6'4"
Weight
173 lbs
Age
27
College
Texas A&M
Experience
3 yrs
Grade Quenton Jackson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Quenton Jackson grades out as a shaky PG for Indiana Pacers (D+ Impact). That places him 84th of 93 graded point guards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D, a slight overpay. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 79 | 8.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 46.7% | 34.9% | 80.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 39 | 8.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 39 | 8.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 46.7% | D- D- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 28 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 47.5% | D D |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.0% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 4/12 | vs DET | L 121-133 | 30 | 21 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 7-15 | 1-4 | -8 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs PHI | L 94-105 | 27 | 16 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$3.2M
Guaranteed
$3.2M
AAV
$1.1M/yr
Quenton Jackson earns a D Contract Value Index (CVI) on a three-year deal worth $1.06M annually—a contract that reflects organizational optimism disconnected from current on-court output. Through 39 games in the 2025-26 season, Jackson has produced 8.6 points, 2.2 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game, numbers that place him squarely in replacement-level territory and largely justify the weak CVI grade; there's no statistical argument for a point guard at this usage and efficiency level to command even a minimum-salary commitment. The $1.06M AAV itself is modest—well below market rate for even a backup point guard—but the risk lies not in the dollars but in the guaranteed rope: converting Jackson off a minimum deal onto a three-year standard contract signals the Pacers view him as a fixture in their rotation, yet his current production offers no evidence that commitment will pay dividends. At 27 years old and in his fourth NBA season, Jackson is firmly in his prime earning window, which makes the performance gap all the more concerning; there's limited runway for a developmental narrative at this age and experience level. The saving grace is that the contract's modest annual figure limits downside damage, and the Pacers' recent roster activity suggests they're actively reshaping the environment around him—whether that creates an opening for Jackson to prove the organizational faith justified remains the defining question heading into a pivotal season. For now, the CVI stands as a cautionary tale: genuine organizational confidence without statistical foundation is a fragile asset, and if Jackson's counting stats don't trend meaningfully upward, this deal will look increasingly like optimism that outran evidence.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Quenton's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Quenton Jackson ranks 84th of 93 graded point guards by performance. That slots Quenton between Daniss Jenkins (D-) just ahead and Aaron Holiday (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Daniss JenkinsDetroit PistonsD-Isaiah StevensSacramento KingsFTyler KolekNew York KnicksFGraded lower
Aaron HolidayHouston RocketsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Quenton Jackson is a player in his 3rd NBA season listed at PG for the Indiana Pacers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Quenton Jackson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance F, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.6 |
| 0.2 |
| 46.7% |
| 37.2% |
| 81.5% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 28 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 47.5% | 37.5% | 77.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 9 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 45.2% | 8.3% | 77.3% |
| 4 |
| 6 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 6-15 |
| 2-8 |
| 0 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ BKN | W 123-94 | 26 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5-11 | 0-1 | +20 |
| Tue, 4/7 | vs MIN | L 104-124 | 25 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-1 | -17 |
| Sun, 4/5 | @ CLE | L 108-117 | 29 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5-14 | 1-4 | +3 |
| Fri, 4/3 | @ CHA | L 108-129 | 25 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6-8 | 2-3 | -12 |
Quenton Jackson earns a F Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA point guards this season. Through 79 games, Quenton is contributing 8.6 points, 2.2 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game in his role. Quenton's strongest area is FG% at 46.7, which compares favorably to the point guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 2.2 (point guard median: 5.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Quenton ranks 84th.
Public perception around Quenton Jackson sits at a solid B — meaningfully above where his on-court performance alone would place him, but grounded in a legitimate storyline that has earned the optimism. The defining narrative driving that sentiment is the contract elevation: converting Jackson off a minimum deal onto a three-year standard NBA agreement is the kind of organizational commitment that shifts a player's public profile overnight, signaling that the Pacers view him as a fixture rather than a depth placeholder. The disconnect between that warm reception and his D- performance grade is real and worth noting — in the 2025-26 season across 39 games, Jackson has posted 8.6 points, 2.2 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game, numbers that reflect a developing role player still far from establishing himself as a reliable contributor on a team sitting at 19-63 in a brutal stretch run. His end-of-season exit interview coverage reinforces the narrative of a player invested in the organization's direction, and the modest but positive media footprint he's built suggests he's being perceived as part of the solution rather than a symptom of the losing. Recent roster moves — the trade for Ivica Zubac and the addition of Jalen Slawson — indicate a front office actively reshaping the roster, which creates both opportunity and competition for a player like Jackson who needs a defined role to develop. The bottom line is that Jackson's public narrative is riding the contract buzz more than his production at the moment, which is a fragile foundation — if his on-court performance doesn't trend upward to meet the organizational investment, that B sentiment grade has nowhere to go but down.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.