
#11C · Indiana Pacers
Height
6'9"
Weight
248 lbs
Age
28
College
Wisconsin
Experience
4 yrs
Grade Micah Potter
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Micah Potter grades out as a strong C for Indiana Pacers (B- Impact). That places him 84th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C-), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 100 | 8.9 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 49.5% | 37.5% | 87.3% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 37 | 8.9 | 4.4 | 1.5 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 37 | 8.9 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 49.5% | D- D- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 38 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 42.2% | D- D- |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 16 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 47.5% | D D |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 7 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 66.7% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 4/12 | vs DET | L 121-133 | 34 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6-13 | 3-10 | -6 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs PHI | L 94-105 | 24 | 13 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.5M
Guaranteed
$4.3M
AAV
$1.5M/yr
Micah Potter's contract with the Indiana Pacers earns a C- CVI — roughly what you'd expect for this level of production and salary. Micah's production is currently below the league median for centers, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $1.5M average annual value ranks as minimum-level money for the center market. The production lines up closely with the price tag, which is essentially paying fair market value. At 28, Micah is in his prime productive window — exactly when teams want their highest-paid players performing at their peak. The 1-year deal limits the Indiana Pacers' downside — if the fit doesn't work, they'll have cap flexibility soon.
Micah Potter earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 100 games, Micah is contributing 8.9 points, 4.4 rebounds, and 1.5 assists per game in his role. Micah's strongest area is FG% at 49.5, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.5 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Micah ranks 84th.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Micah's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Micah Potter ranks 84th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Micah between Tristan Vukcevic (D-) just ahead and Ariel Hukporti (D-) just behind.
Graded higher
Tristan VukcevicWashington WizardsD-Isaac JonesDetroit PistonsD-Dwight PowellDallas MavericksD-Graded lower
Ariel HukportiNew York KnicksNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Micah Potter is a player in his 4th NBA season listed at C for the Indiana Pacers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Micah Potter, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D-, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.5 |
| 0.4 |
| 49.5% |
| 40.5% |
| 88.2% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 38 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 42.2% | 31.6% | 85.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 16 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 47.5% | 42.9% | 75.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 7 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 66.7% | 57.1% | 0.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 3 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 45.5% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 10 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 5-10 |
| 3-6 |
| +2 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ BKN | W 123-94 | 23 | 18 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8-15 | 1-4 | +12 |
| Tue, 4/7 | vs MIN | L 104-124 | 22 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0 |
| Sun, 4/5 | @ CLE | L 108-117 | 30 | 21 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6-10 | 3-5 | -8 |
| Fri, 4/3 | @ CHA | L 108-129 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-2 | -18 |
Micah Potter's public perception sits comfortably at a B sentiment grade — a remarkable position for a depth big on a Pacers team currently sitting at 19-63 and holding the 14th seed in the Eastern Conference. The narrative driving that goodwill is almost entirely character-based: his journey from G League uncertainty to a first guaranteed NBA contract has generated the kind of warmly received, perseverance-driven coverage that national and regional outlets love to amplify, and off-court moments like the baby gender reveal and faith-based commentary have reinforced his image as a genuinely likable locker room presence. That sentiment warmth, however, exists in clear tension with a D performance grade — through 37 games in the 2025-26 season, Potter is averaging 8.9 PPG, 4.4 RPG, and 1.5 APG, numbers that profile him accurately as a below-average rotation piece rather than a meaningful contributor on a winning roster. The front office's mid-season acquisition of Ivica Zubac via trade adds a direct competitive pressure point that the broader media has not yet turned against Potter, but the addition of a veteran center inevitably clouds his path to consistent minutes and could quietly shift that narrative if his role diminishes further down the stretch. For now, Potter benefits from the goodwill cushion that compelling backstory coverage tends to provide fringe players, but with the Pacers deep in lottery territory and the roster actively being reshaped, his B sentiment grade is more a tribute to who he is off the court than what he has delivered on it.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.