
#36SG · Los Angeles Lakers
Height
6'3"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
32
College
Oklahoma State
Experience
11 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.3"
Reach
8'3.0"
Hand Size
9" × 8.75"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 695 | 9.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 39.9% | 32.5% | 77.9% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 60 | 9.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 5/6 | @ OKC | L 90-108 | 32 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 4-15 | 2-8 | -10 |
| Sat, 5/2 | @ HOU | W 98-78 | 35 | 7 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$25.3M
Guaranteed
$10.5M
AAV
$19.9M/yr
Marcus Smart's contract with the Los Angeles Lakers earns a C CVI — roughly what you'd expect for this level of production and salary. Marcus's current production grades out in the middle of the pack among NBA shooting guards. His $19.9M average annual value ranks as mid-tier money for the shooting guard market. The production lines up closely with the price tag, which is essentially paying fair market value. At 32, Marcus is on the back end of his prime — the contract value depends on how well he maintains production as age-related decline typically accelerates. The 2-year deal keeps the commitment short, giving the team financial flexibility to move on if performance drops.
Marcus Smart earns a B- Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level shooting guard putting up solid numbers for the Los Angeles Lakers. Through 695 games, Marcus is contributing 9.5 points, 2.8 rebounds, and 2.8 assists per game in his role. Marcus's best relative area is FG% at 39.9, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 2.8 (shooting guard median: 5.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Marcus ranks 31st. Marcus is a reliable contributor who the Los Angeles Lakers can count on game to game.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 1.4 |
| 0.4 |
| 39.9% |
| 33.6% |
| 81.6% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 34 | 9.0 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 39.3% | 34.8% | 76.1% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 20 | 14.4 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 43.0% | 31.3% | 76.8% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 20 | 14.9 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 45.3% | 36.1% | 80.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 21 | 15.4 | 4.5 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 40.5% | 35.0% | 80.6% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 5 | 17.8 | 4.4 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 43.9% | 37.2% | 71.4% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 17 | 14.5 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 39.4% | 33.3% | 87.5% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 2 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 9.1% | 9.1% | 66.7% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 15 | 9.8 | 3.7 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 33.6% | 22.1% | 73.5% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 18 | 8.6 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 35.1% | 39.7% | 64.0% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 6 | 12.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 36.7% | 34.4% | 81.0% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 4 | 9.8 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 48.3% | 23.1% | 53.3% |
| 7 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 2-7 |
| 2-4 |
| +25 |
| Thu, 4/30 | vs HOU | L 93-99 | 37 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 3-7 | -7 |
| Mon, 4/27 | @ HOU | L 96-115 | 31 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-2 | -20 |
| Sat, 4/25 | @ HOU | W 112-108 | 39 | 21 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 5-9 | 2-4 | +3 |
| Wed, 4/22 | vs HOU | W 101-94 | 35 | 25 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 8-13 | 5-7 | +3 |
| Sun, 4/19 | vs HOU | W 107-98 | 34 | 15 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-5 | -5 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs UTA | W 131-107 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1-7 | 1-5 | +13 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs PHX | W 101-73 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 | +5 |
Marcus Smart's public standing with Lakers fans and media has surged to an A+ sentiment grade heading into the thick of the 2026 playoffs, making him one of the most positively perceived players in the building right now. The driving force is a combination of his 25-point performance in Game 2 against Houston — a game that reportedly saw him make Lakers franchise history — and a mic'd-up segment that reminded everyone why 12-year veterans with a 2022 Defensive Player of the Year on their resume command locker room respect the moment they walk in. That said, the sentiment-to-production gap here is real and worth naming: a C+ performance grade across 60 regular-season games, with averages of 9.5 PPG, 2.8 RPG, and 2.8 APG, tells the story of an established veteran running in a complementary role, not a primary engine. Smart is benefiting from perfectly timed playoff heroics — the kind of two-game stretch that rewrites a narrative in ways a full regular season never can, and the media has fully bought in, framing him as indispensable veteran savvy on a team now up 2-0 on the Rockets. The Luke Kennard trade acquisition in February is a notable sidebar, as Smart and Kennard drawing co-billing in the same win-over-Houston coverage suggests the front office's mid-season retooling is being graded as a success in real time. With the Lakers locked into a 7-3 run over their last ten games and carrying a 53-29 record into the postseason as the four seed, Smart's resurgent playoff reputation is feeding directly into broader organizational optimism. The bottom line: the sentiment grade reflects a genuine emotional peak — playoff heroics, franchise history, and leadership theater all hitting simultaneously — but the durability of this A+ narrative will depend entirely on how deep this Lakers run goes.