
#43SG · San Antonio Spurs
Height
6'5"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
28
College
Oklahoma State
Experience
4 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 192 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 40.3% | 36.6% | 79.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 37 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/29 | vs POR | W 114-95 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 |
| Sun, 4/26 | @ POR | W 114-93 | 2 | 0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Lindy Waters III's one-year, $2.3M deal with the Spurs earns a C+ Contract Value Index (CVI) grade that reflects smart, low-risk roster management rather than any significant on-court impact. Despite Waters posting a D+ performance grade as a middling rotation piece, his minimal financial commitment makes this contract essentially bulletproof from a value perspective. The Spurs are paying replacement-level money for a player who can provide depth at shooting guard without any long-term obligations, which represents solid front office prudence even if Waters hasn't delivered meaningful production. San Antonio maintains complete roster flexibility while taking a flyer on a player who could potentially develop into a more consistent contributor. This type of short-term, affordable contract allows teams to evaluate talent without hamstringing their salary cap, making it the kind of low-downside move that championship organizations execute routinely. The C+ grade reflects that while Waters hasn't justified a higher investment, the Spurs haven't committed anything substantial enough to damage their financial flexibility or competitive timeline.
Lindy Waters III earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA shooting guards this season. Through 192 games, Lindy is contributing 2.4 points, 0.7 rebounds, and 0.5 assists per game in his role. Lindy's best relative area is FG% at 40.3, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.5 (shooting guard median: 4.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Lindy ranks 104th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.1 |
| 0.0 |
| 40.3% |
| 36.8% |
| 100.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 52 | 4.9 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 36.9% | 34.4% | 72.7% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 41 | 5.2 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 39.3% | 35.8% | 80.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 25 | 8.0 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 40.6% | 36.3% | 80.0% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-0 |
| 0-0 |
| +2 |
| Mon, 4/20 | vs POR | W 111-98 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Tue, 4/7 | vs PHI | W 115-102 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | +2 |
Lindy Waters III's public standing with Spurs fans and local media sits at a quietly complicated crossroads — warm enough on a human level, but increasingly difficult to justify as the team charges into the playoffs as the No. 2 seed in the West with a 62-20 record and real championship aspirations. The narrative driving his goodwill has almost nothing to do with what happens on the floor: coverage of his Indigenous youth basketball clinics in San Antonio and his thoughtful reflections on his Native American heritage have generated genuine community affection, and feature pieces framing his worst shooting nights as character-building moments speak to a media portrait built around professionalism and culture fit rather than production. That disconnect becomes harder to ignore when you look at his actual 2025-26 on-court output — 2.4 PPG, 0.7 RPG, and 0.5 APG across 37 games is replacement-level contribution for a team now operating in must-win territory, and the D+ performance grade reflects exactly that gap. Recent roster moves add further pressure to his standing: San Antonio signed Emanuel Miller and Mason Plumlee while cutting Jeremy Sochan and Stanley Umude, signaling a front office actively reshaping depth at a critical juncture, which inevitably raises questions about how many roster spots exist for a below-average statistical contributor. The bottom line is that Waters occupies a peculiar lane in the public conversation — genuinely appreciated as a person and a professional, but surrounded by mounting evidence that playoff-caliber rosters have little room for sentiment, and the cooling narrative grade reflects exactly that tension.