
#31SF · Dallas Mavericks
Height
6'5"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
36
College
Washington State
Experience
14 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.0"
Reach
8'7.5"
Hand Size
8.75" × 9.25"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 926 | 11.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 39.8% | 40.9% | 85.7% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 62 | 11.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | vs CHI | W 149-128 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-10 | 4-9 | -4 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ LAC | L 103-116 | 26 | 11 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$34.1M
Guaranteed
$34.1M
AAV
$16.7M/yr
**Klay Thompson's Contract Value Index (CVI) earns a concerning D- grade, reflecting a significant disconnect between his $16.7M AAV deal and his current on-court production.** While Thompson remains a recognizable name with championship pedigree, his C- performance grade exposes the harsh reality that Dallas is paying above-average starter money for what has become replacement-level output. The two-year commitment at nearly $17M annually represents a classic case of paying for past accomplishments rather than present value, as Thompson's defensive mobility and shooting consistency have declined notably from his elite Warriors days. Dallas essentially bet $33.4M total that Thompson could recapture enough of his former self to justify franchise-caliber compensation, but the early returns suggest they're overpaying by at least $6-8M annually for a player who now profiles more as a middling role player. This contract structure—shorter term but inflated AAV—limits Dallas's flexibility while failing to extract meaningful value from a once-elite shooter who appears to be in clear decline. The Mavericks would have been better served pursuing younger, more cost-effective alternatives rather than chasing the ghost of Thompson's championship runs.
Klay Thompson earns a C- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA small forwards this season. Through 926 games, Klay is contributing 11.9 points, 2.2 rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game in his role. Klay's best relative area is FG% at 39.8, though it still falls below the small forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.4 (small forward median: 4.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Klay ranks 47th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.5 |
| 0.3 |
| 39.8% |
| 38.9% |
| 73.8% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 72 | 14.0 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 41.2% | 39.1% | 90.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 77 | 17.9 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 43.2% | 38.7% | 92.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 13 | 18.5 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 38.8% | 36.8% | 87.5% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 22 | 19.0 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 42.9% | 38.5% | 86.7% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 21 | 20.7 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 45.6% | 44.3% | 90.2% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 21 | 19.6 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 46.5% | 42.7% | 87.1% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 17 | 15.0 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 39.7% | 38.7% | 78.8% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 24 | 24.3 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 44.4% | 42.4% | 85.4% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 21 | 18.6 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 44.6% | 39.0% | 80.0% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 7 | 16.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 40.8% | 36.4% | 79.2% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 12 | 15.2 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 43.7% | 42.4% | 83.3% |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 66 | 12.5 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 44.3% | 41.4% | 86.8% |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 3 |
| 4-17 |
| 1-10 |
| +1 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs ORL | L 127-138 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7-13 | 4-10 | -11 |
Public sentiment around Klay Thompson has genuinely recovered — the grade sits at a B after trending up from a D, which tells you the court of opinion has softened considerably even as his on-court performance remains a concern. The driving narrative remains one of transition and regret: his first season in Dallas has been framed almost universally through the lens of unfulfilled expectations, with coverage leaning into the gap between the championship pedigree he carried out of Golden State and what his Mavericks tenure has actually delivered. That framing is hard to argue with when you look at the production — in the 2025-26 season he has posted 11.9 PPG, 2.2 RPG, and 1.4 APG across 62 games, numbers that reflect a below-average offensive contributor rather than the elite shooter who defined his prime, and his C- performance grade confirms the gap is real. What's lifting sentiment despite all of that is a recent hot streak that has reminded observers his offensive ceiling isn't gone — Thompson has always been capable of these stretches, and fans still carry genuine affection for a longtime veteran with his career résumé. The organizational noise isn't helping the broader picture, though: Dallas has been shedding rotation pieces, a pending roster decision regarding Thompson himself has fueled speculation, and the franchise's front-office turnover adds to the sense of institutional drift surrounding him. The narrative today is genuinely conflicted — warmer than it was a month ago, buoyed by those recent shooting flashes and accumulated goodwill, but still shadowed by a difficult season, load management headlines, and a 26-56 Mavericks team that has offered him very little in the way of a redemptive storyline.