
#42PF · Utah Jazz
Height
6'10"
Weight
251 lbs
Age
37
College
UCLA
Experience
17 yrs
Wingspan
6'11.3"
Reach
8'10.0"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 989 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 39.7% | 36.9% | 82.8% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 37 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 1.8 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$4.2M
Guaranteed
$4.2M
AAV
$4.2M/yr
Kevin Love's one-year, $4.2M AAV deal with Utah represents solid value despite his D performance grade, earning a C on the Contract Value Index (CVI). The veteran power forward's production has clearly declined from his All-Star days, but at just $4.2 million annually, the Jazz are paying replacement-level money for what amounts to replacement-level output. Love's contract structure — a short-term, low-risk commitment — allows Utah flexibility while providing veteran leadership and occasional flashes of his former rebounding and three-point shooting ability. The discrepancy between his poor on-court performance and middling CVI grade reflects the reality that terrible players on minimum contracts often represent better value than terrible players on max deals. For a rebuilding Jazz team, Love's deal carries minimal financial risk while offering mentorship to younger players, making it a reasonable gamble at this price point. The C grade essentially rewards the contract's pragmatic structure rather than Love's individual contributions, which have clearly fallen to below-average levels.
Kevin Love earns a D Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 989 games, Kevin is contributing 6.7 points, 5.8 rebounds, and 1.8 assists per game in his role. Kevin's strongest area is RPG at 5.8, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 6.7 (power forward median: 15.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Kevin ranks 65th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.4 |
| 0.2 |
| 39.7% |
| 37.3% |
| 84.1% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 23 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 35.7% | 35.8% | 69.6% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 5 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 44.4% | 25.0% | 0.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 20 | 6.8 | 5.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 37.8% | 37.5% | 87.5% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 74 | 13.6 | 7.2 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 43.0% | 39.2% | 83.8% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 25 | 12.2 | 7.4 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 40.9% | 36.5% | 82.4% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 56 | 17.6 | 9.8 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 45.0% | 37.4% | 85.4% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 22 | 17.0 | 10.9 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 38.5% | 36.1% | 90.4% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 21 | 14.9 | 10.2 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 39.2% | 34.0% | 92.2% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 18 | 16.8 | 10.6 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 43.6% | 45.0% | 84.0% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 20 | 14.7 | 8.8 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 38.5% | 41.4% | 84.0% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 4 | 14.3 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 41.5% | 42.9% | 73.7% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 77 | 26.1 | 12.5 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 45.7% | 37.6% | 82.1% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 18 | 18.3 | 14.0 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 35.2% | 21.7% | 70.4% |
| 2011-12 | ![]() | 55 | 26.0 | 13.3 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 44.8% | 37.2% | 82.4% |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 73 | 20.2 | 15.2 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 47.0% | 41.7% | 85.0% |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 60 | 14.0 | 11.0 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 45.0% | 33.0% | 81.5% |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 81 | 11.1 | 9.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 45.9% | 10.5% | 78.9% |
Kevin Love's public standing sits at an A- sentiment grade heading into the final stretch of a lost season for the Jazz, a remarkable disconnect from what the won-loss column would suggest about anyone in that locker room. The narrative engine here is almost entirely intangible: media coverage has leaned hard into Love's communication skills, locker-room credibility, and genuine willingness to serve as a mentor on a young roster, framing him not as a veteran collecting a paycheck but as an active architect of organizational culture. That reputation is doing serious heavy lifting, because his on-court production — 6.7 PPG, 5.8 RPG, and 1.8 APG across 37 games in the 2025-26 season — earns a D performance grade, the kind of output you'd expect from a 37-year-old on a veteran-minimum deal with a rebuilding club rather than a meaningful rotation piece. Utah's recent roster activity, including a wave of 10-day and rest-of-season signings for developmental guards like Kennedy Chandler and Bez Mbeng, reinforces that the Jazz are prioritizing youth and roster evaluation over veteran production, which paradoxically elevates Love's perceived role as the experienced hand guiding those young players through the process. His two All-NBA 2nd Team selections and championship pedigree give him a credibility floor that most players in his situation simply don't have, and the media tone has been genuinely warm rather than nostalgic or dismissive. The bottom line: Love's sentiment is trending upward precisely because he's accepted his role with grace, and in a season where the Jazz have little to play for, his value is measured entirely in culture — and on that front, the public verdict is firmly positive.