
#34PF · Oklahoma City Thunder
Height
6'7"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
31
College
TCU
Experience
7 yrs
Wingspan
6'7.3"
Reach
8'7.5"
Hand Size
8.5" × 9.75"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 438 | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 49.4% | 36.9% | 56.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 48 | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 5/6 | vs LAL | W 108-90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Tue, 4/28 | @ PHX | W 131-122 | 1 | 0 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$14.3M
Guaranteed
$14.3M
AAV
$7.2M/yr
Kenrich Williams' two-year, $7.2M AAV deal with the Oklahoma City Thunder represents one of the more questionable contract decisions in recent memory, earning a failing Contract Value Index (CVI) grade. Despite his reputation as a versatile defender and energy player, Williams' D- performance grade exposes the harsh reality that his on-court production simply doesn't justify paying him starter-level money. At $7.2 million annually, the Thunder are essentially paying above-average starter compensation for what amounts to replacement-level production from the power forward position. Williams falls into that unfortunate category of role players whose intangible contributions and defensive versatility get overvalued in contract negotiations, leading teams to overpay for limited offensive impact and inconsistent overall performance. While Oklahoma City has the financial flexibility to absorb this misstep, the deal serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of paying for potential rather than proven production. The F-grade CVI reflects the significant disconnect between Williams' actual value and his contract compensation, making this one of the league's most inefficient player investments.
Kenrich Williams earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 438 games, Kenrich is contributing 6.6 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game in his role. Kenrich's strongest area is FG% at 49.4, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.4 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Kenrich ranks 77th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.6 |
| 0.1 |
| 49.4% |
| 40.4% |
| 64.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 16 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 40.0% | 20.0% | 50.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 53 | 8.0 | 4.9 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 51.7% | 37.3% | 43.6% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 49 | 7.4 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 46.1% | 33.9% | 54.5% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 66 | 8.0 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 53.3% | 44.4% | 57.1% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 39 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 34.7% | 25.8% | 34.6% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 46 | 6.1 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 38.4% | 33.3% | 68.4% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-0 |
| 0-0 |
| -2 |
| Sat, 4/25 | @ PHX | W 121-109 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -2 |
| Sun, 4/19 | vs PHX | W 119-84 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | +1 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs PHX | L 103-135 | 33 | 13 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5-12 | 2-6 | -26 |
| Sat, 4/11 | @ DEN | L 107-127 | 32 | 15 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7-22 | 1-6 | -22 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ LAC | W 128-110 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -3 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ LAL | W 123-87 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-3 | +5 |
Kenrich Williams sits at a C+ sentiment grade — quietly respected but not generating the kind of buzz you'd expect from a contributor on the NBA's top Western Conference seed heading into the playoffs. The narrative around him has cooled noticeably over the last 30 days, sliding down from what was a genuinely warm reception at the start of the season when coverage leaned heavily into his TCU roots and his championship journey resonating with local and national audiences alike. That feel-good momentum got its biggest boost from a standout performance in an improbable win over the Memphis Grizzlies, which briefly elevated him into the conversation as a clutch, high-energy role player — exactly the archetype OKC's system rewards. The disconnect, however, is hard to ignore: his on-court production this season grades out at a D-, and while his 2025-26 numbers of 6.6 PPG, 3.2 RPG, and 1.4 APG across 48 games tell the story of a depth piece rather than a rotation anchor, the media framing has consistently positioned him as more meaningful to the Thunder's competitive outlook than the raw production warrants. Recent roster churn — the team releasing Mason Plumlee, cycling through Buddy Boeheim twice, and adding Payton Sandfort — signals that OKC is actively fine-tuning its depth ahead of a deep playoff run, which puts Williams' role under subtle but real scrutiny even if no headline has explicitly said so. At 31 and eight seasons into his career, Williams is a recognized culture-fit veteran on a legitimate title contender, but with the sentiment trend cooling and production failing to justify the goodwill, the narrative around him feels more fragile than it did three months ago.