
#30C · Utah Jazz
Height
6'11"
Weight
290 lbs
Age
31
Experience
11 yrs
Grade Jusuf Nurkic
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jusuf Nurkic grades out as a shaky C for Utah Jazz (D+ Impact). That places him 29th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C+) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 11+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 631 | 10.9 | 10.4 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 50.3% | 29.4% | 66.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 41 | 10.9 | 10.4 | 4.8 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 41 | 10.9 | 10.4 | 4.8 | 50.3% | B- B- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 51 | 8.9 | 7.8 | 2.3 | 47.7% | C+ C+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 76 | 10.9 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 51.0% | B B |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 52 | 13.3 | 9.1 | 2.9 | 51.9% | B- B- |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 56 | 15.0 | 11.1 | 2.8 | 53.5% | B B |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 37 | 11.5 | 9.0 | 3.4 | 51.4% | B B |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 8 | 17.6 | 10.3 | 4.0 | 49.5% | A- A- |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 72 | 15.6 | 10.4 | 3.2 | 50.8% | A- A- |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 79 | 14.3 | 9.0 | 1.8 | 50.5% | B B |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 65 | 10.2 | 7.2 | 1.9 | 50.7% | C+ C+ |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 32 | 8.2 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 41.7% | C C |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 62 | 6.9 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 44.6% | C- C- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
1 year
Total Value
$19.4M
Guaranteed
$19.4M
AAV
$19.4M/yr
Jusuf Nurkic earns a C+ Contract Value Index (CVI), a grade that reflects the fundamental tension between his serviceable on-court contributions and the durability concerns that have calcified his market standing at age 31. His 2025-26 production—10.9 PPG, 10.4 RPG, 4.8 APG across 41 games—delivered solid starter value, and film-room analysis has consistently highlighted his underrated playmaking from the center position, qualities that align with his C+ performance grade; however, that productivity came in a truncated season, and the injury that ended his campaign only deepened the availability questions shadowing his entire 12-year career. At $19.4M AAV on a one-year deal, Nurkic occupies an awkward middle ground—expensive enough to represent meaningful cap commitment, yet positioned on a roster clearly in developmental mode based on Utah's recent string of 10-day and rest-of-season guard signings, suggesting the franchise itself has not firmly committed to his long-term role. The broader media narrative treats him as a capable rotation anchor whose ceiling is well-understood rather than a cornerstone piece, leaving him in "prove your worth" territory heading into the offseason; the disconnect between his proven playmaking and his depressed public standing is real, but it is rooted in the legitimate historical pattern of missed games, not on-court limitations. With just one year remaining on his contract and his desired future in Utah complicated by concurrent trade deadline speculation, Nurkic enters the offseason needing to string together significant healthy minutes to rebuild the benefit of the doubt he has gradually lost.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jusuf's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jusuf Nurkic ranks 29th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Jusuf between Kristaps Porzingis (B-) just ahead and Alex Sarr (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Kristaps PorzingisGolden State WarriorsB-Jaren Jackson Jr.Utah JazzB-Ryan KalkbrennerCharlotte HornetsB-Graded lower
Alex SarrWashington WizardsAcquired C Jusuf Nurkić from Charlotte Hornets for G Collin Sexton and a 2030 second-round pick.
Utah Jazz · trade · 6/29/2025
Acquired C Jusuf Nurkic (Portland), F Nassir Little (Portland) and Gs Grayson Allen (Milwaukee) and Keon Johnson (Portland) in a three-team trade with the Portland Trail Blazers and the Milwaukee Bucks. PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS - Acquired C Deandre Ayton and F Toumani Camra from Phoenix and G Jrue Holiday and draft considerations from Milwaukee in a three-team trade.
Phoenix Suns · trade · 9/27/2023
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jusuf Nurkic is a veteran in his 11th NBA season listed at C for the Utah Jazz. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jusuf Nurkic, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C+, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 1.3 |
| 0.5 |
| 50.3% |
| 35.2% |
| 54.9% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 51 | 8.9 | 7.8 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 47.7% | 30.5% | 66.4% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 76 | 10.9 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 51.0% | 24.4% | 64.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 52 | 13.3 | 9.1 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 51.9% | 36.1% | 66.1% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 56 | 15.0 | 11.1 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 53.5% | 26.8% | 69.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 37 | 11.5 | 9.0 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 51.4% | 40.0% | 61.9% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 8 | 17.6 | 10.3 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 49.5% | 20.0% | 88.6% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 72 | 15.6 | 10.4 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 50.8% | 10.3% | 77.3% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 79 | 14.3 | 9.0 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 50.5% | 0.0% | 63.0% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 65 | 10.2 | 7.2 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 50.7% | 0.0% | 57.1% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 32 | 8.2 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 41.7% | 0.0% | 61.6% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 62 | 6.9 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 44.6% | 0.0% | 63.6% |
Jusuf Nurkic earns a C+ Performance grade, reflecting league-average production for a center. Through 631 games, Jusuf is contributing 10.9 points, 10.4 rebounds, and 4.8 assists per game in his role. Jusuf's strongest area is RPG at 10.4, which compares favorably to the center median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 10.9 (center median: 15.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Jusuf ranks 29th.
Recent headlines push Jusuf Nurkic's sentiment grade to a B-, with Utah's broader season shaping the read. The narrative around the 31-year-old center sits in exhausted skepticism territory—media framing treats him as a serviceable veteran whose ceiling is perpetually capped by durability concerns rather than on-court limitations, and the dominant discourse centers on whether he factors into the franchise's future rather than celebrating what he brings when healthy. There's a meaningful disconnect between his 2025-26 production (10.9 PPG, 10.4 RPG, 4.8 APG across 41 games) and his public standing: film-room analysis praises his underrated playmaking from the center position, and that performance earned a solid C+ grade, yet the injury that ended his season prematurely only reinforced the availability questions that have shadowed his entire 12-year career. Utah's recent roster activity—a string of 10-day signings and rest-of-season contracts for fringe guards—signals an organization in full developmental mode, which does nothing to rehabilitate Nurkic's standing, while concurrent headlines about his desire to remain in Utah sit awkwardly alongside trade deadline speculation, suggesting the Jazz organization itself hasn't fully committed to his long-term role. At $19.4M annually on a rebuilding roster, the skepticism surrounding Nurkic is unlikely to lift until he strings together significant healthy minutes; for now, he enters the offseason as a capable starting center slowly losing the benefit of the doubt.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.