
#11SF · Philadelphia Sixers
Height
6'7"
Weight
203 lbs
Age
22
College
Kentucky
Experience
1 yrs
Wingspan
6'10.0"
Reach
8'6.5"
Hand Size
8.75" × 8.75"
Grade Justin Edwards
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Justin Edwards grades out as a shaky SF for Philadelphia Sixers (D+ Impact). That places him 71st of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C+) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a pro, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 98 | 6.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 44.8% | 36.6% | 76.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 55 | 6.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 55 | 6.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 44.8% | D D |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 44 | 10.1 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 45.5% | C- C- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 5/10 | vs NYK | L 114-144 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-9 | 0-6 | +3 |
| Fri, 5/8 | vs NYK | L 94-108 | 2 | 0 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$7.1M
Guaranteed
$4.5M
AAV
$2.0M/yr
Justin Edwards earns a C+ Contract Value Index (CVI), a grade that reflects the significant gap between his $2.0M AAV on a three-year deal and his current on-court contributions—a D+ performance grade underpinned by 6.2 PPG, 1.6 RPG, and 1.4 APG across 55 games this season. For a 22-year-old second-year wing, this production profile sits well below rotational starter territory, and the contract carries real opportunity cost in terms of salary-cap flexibility and roster spots that could be allocated to more productive talent. The AAV itself is modest in absolute terms and appropriate for a developmental player on a rookie-scale trajectory, but the disconnect between the media's warm narrative arc—anchored by a career-high 32-point performance and genuine organizational trust from the coaching staff—and the actual statistical output creates a valuation tension that the C+ grade captures. Edwards' professional approach and his earning of meaningful coaching confidence have genuine value and may signal upside that raw counting stats don't yet reflect, but sustained production will be required before the narrative momentum alone justifies the long-term commitment inherent in a three-year deal. The Sixers are clearly invested in developing this young wing core, as evidenced by recent roster moves, but Edwards' ceiling as a franchise asset remains contingent on converting soft-skill promise into consistent scoring and efficiency at above-average volume—something his current production profile does not yet support. Right now, you're paying for the player he could become and the organizational belief in his process, not for what he's currently delivering on the floor.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Justin's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Justin Edwards ranks 71st of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots Justin between Corey Kispert (D+) just ahead and Payton Sandfort (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Corey KispertAtlanta HawksD+Johni BroomePhiladelphia SixersD+Leaky BlackWashington WizardsD+Graded lower
Payton SandfortOklahoma City ThunderNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Justin Edwards is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at SF for the Philadelphia Sixers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Justin Edwards, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance D+, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.9 |
| 0.2 |
| 44.8% |
| 37.3% |
| 85.7% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 44 | 10.1 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 45.5% | 36.3% | 69.6% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-0 |
| 0-0 |
| +2 |
| Tue, 5/5 | @ NYK | L 98-137 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 2-4 | -10 |
| Sat, 5/2 | @ BOS | W 109-100 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | -8 |
| Fri, 5/1 | vs BOS | W 106-93 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | -5 |
| Sun, 4/26 | vs BOS | L 96-128 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -17 |
| Fri, 4/24 | vs BOS | L 100-108 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | -7 |
| Tue, 4/21 | @ BOS | W 111-97 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-2 | +8 |
Justin Edwards earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA small forwards this season. Through 98 games, Justin is contributing 6.2 points, 1.6 rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game in his role. Justin's best relative area is FG% at 44.8, though it still falls below the small forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 1.6 (small forward median: 5.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Justin ranks 71st. At 22, Justin is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Philadelphia Sixers.
Justin Edwards is riding a notably warmer media wave than his on-court production strictly justifies, landing at a B- sentiment grade that reflects genuine optimism tempered by the reality of a second-year player still finding his footing. The narrative engine here is a career-high 32-point explosion against Sacramento on March 19th — a performance that gave media the story arc they were looking for, framing Edwards as a patience-rewarded success story and validating Philadelphia's player development infrastructure in the process. The disconnect between that warm perception and his D+ performance grade is real, though: in the 2025-26 season across 55 games, Edwards is averaging 6.2 points, 1.6 rebounds, and 1.4 assists — solid-starter numbers this is not, and the gap between the buzz and the box score is wide enough to keep the sentiment from climbing higher. Nick Nurse's public endorsement and direct marching orders to Edwards carry meaningful weight in shaping how he's perceived, elevating him beyond a typical depth wing and signaling organizational belief that his professional process-driven mindset has earned real coaching trust. On the roster-movement front, Philadelphia's recent activity — re-signing Dalen Terry, bringing in Tyrese Martin, and extending Jabari Walker — paints a picture of a team building out its young wing depth, a context that simultaneously gives Edwards more competition and reinforces that the franchise is invested in this developmental core. With the Sixers sitting at 45-37 as the No. 7 seed heading into the playoffs, the stakes are rising fast, and Edwards' narrative sits at an interesting crossroads: the goodwill is real, but sustained production will be required before the soft-skill praise alone can hold up the ceiling. Right now, the story around Justin Edwards is compelling enough to sustain B- sentiment, but it is sentiment built more on trajectory and one signature night than on a body of work that demands it.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.