
#30PF · Minnesota Timberwolves
Height
6'9"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
31
College
Kentucky
Experience
11 yrs
Wingspan
7'0.0"
Reach
8'9.5"
Hand Size
8.75" × 8.25"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 789 | 21.1 | 6.7 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 48.1% | 33.2% | 75.9% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 79 | 21.1 | 6.7 | 5.0 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 5/1 | vs DEN | W 110-98 | 37 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6-17 | 2-5 | +15 |
| Tue, 4/28 | @ DEN | L 113-125 | 32 | 27 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$100.0M
Guaranteed
$64.2M
AAV
$30.9M/yr
Julius Randle's $30.9M AAV extension with the Timberwolves earns a B- Contract Value Index (CVI) grade, reflecting solid value despite some premium attached to his proven production. The veteran power forward's B+ performance grade justifies most of his hefty salary, as he brings elite rebounding, versatile scoring ability, and veteran leadership to Minnesota's championship-contending core. At $30.9M annually, Randle sits in that tricky middle tier where he's clearly above-average but falls short of being a true franchise-caliber player worth elite money. His contract represents reasonable market value for a player who can anchor frontcourt production and provide playoff experience, though the slight grade gap between his performance (B+) and CVI (B-) suggests Minnesota is paying a modest premium for his services. The three-year commitment limits long-term risk while securing a solid starter who should complement Anthony Edwards' development, making this a defensible investment even if it's not quite elite value.
Julius Randle earns a B+ Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level power forward putting up solid numbers for the Minnesota Timberwolves. He's averaging 21.1 points, 6.7 rebounds, and 5.0 assists through 789 games — carrying a significant offensive load. Julius's strongest area is PPG at 21.1, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 15.0. The biggest area for growth is FG% at 48.1 (power forward median: 46.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Julius ranks 9th. Julius is a reliable contributor who the Minnesota Timberwolves can count on game to game.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 1.1 |
| 0.2 |
| 48.1% |
| 31.5% |
| 80.2% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 69 | 18.7 | 7.1 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 48.5% | 34.4% | 80.6% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 46 | 24.0 | 9.2 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 47.2% | 31.1% | 78.1% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 77 | 25.1 | 10.0 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 46.0% | 34.3% | 75.7% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 72 | 20.1 | 9.9 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 41.1% | 30.8% | 75.6% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 71 | 24.1 | 10.2 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 45.6% | 41.1% | 81.1% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 64 | 19.5 | 9.7 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 46.0% | 27.7% | 73.3% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 73 | 21.4 | 8.7 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 52.4% | 34.4% | 73.1% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 82 | 16.1 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 55.8% | 22.2% | 71.8% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 74 | 13.2 | 8.6 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 48.7% | 27.0% | 72.3% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 81 | 11.3 | 10.2 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 42.9% | 27.8% | 71.5% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 9 |
| 6 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 8-15 |
| 2-4 |
| -16 |
| Sun, 4/26 | vs DEN | W 112-96 | 32 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6-16 | 0-1 | +13 |
| Fri, 4/24 | vs DEN | W 113-96 | 33 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6-15 | 0-3 | +8 |
| Tue, 4/21 | @ DEN | W 119-114 | 36 | 24 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7-14 | 2-4 | +6 |
| Sat, 4/18 | @ DEN | L 105-116 | 31 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7-16 | 0-3 | -9 |
| Tue, 4/7 | @ IND | W 124-104 | 28 | 19 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5-13 | 3-7 | +19 |
Julius Randle is riding a genuine wave of goodwill entering the playoffs, and the A- sentiment grade reflects a veteran who has quietly rebuilt his public standing into something meaningful. The dominant media narrative centers on his impending assignment guarding Nikola Jokić — a matchup so daunting that Randle's self-deprecating acknowledgment that he might need divine intervention to contain the Nuggets' star landed as charming and disarming rather than alarming, which says a lot about where his reputation currently sits. That sentiment premium is well-earned on the production side, too — his B+ performance grade is backed by 21.1 PPG, 6.7 RPG, and 5.0 APG across 79 games in the 2025-26 season, a line that confirms he remains a franchise-caliber contributor rather than a reclamation project, and his All-NBA pedigree reinforces that he belongs in high-leverage moments. Recent roster moves — most notably the additions of Mike Conley and Ayo Dosunmu — have subtly strengthened the perception of Minnesota as a coherent playoff outfit, which reflects positively on every established piece in the rotation, Randle included. A late-game scuffle with Jokić in Game 4 drew fines for both players but no suspensions, and that kind of competitive edge has been absorbed into the narrative as proof of investment rather than a red flag. With Minnesota holding the six seed and the series very much in play, Randle is positioned as the defining X-factor — the veteran whose performance against the most dominant big man in basketball will either validate or complicate everything the optimism around him is built on right now.