
#20SG · Houston Rockets
Height
6'4"
Weight
213 lbs
Age
27
College
Georgia Tech
Experience
7 yrs
Wingspan
7'0.0"
Reach
8'6.0"
Hand Size
9" × 9.75"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 483 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 43.2% | 31.3% | 73.6% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 68 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 5/2 | vs LAL | L 78-98 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0 |
| Thu, 4/30 | @ LAL | W 99-93 | 18 | 7 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$7.8M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Josh Okogie's contract with the Houston Rockets earns a C+ CVI — roughly what you'd expect for this level of production and salary. Josh's production is currently below the league median for shooting guards, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $2.3M average annual value ranks as minimum-level money for the shooting guard market. The production lines up closely with the price tag, which is essentially paying fair market value. At 27, Josh is in his prime productive window — exactly when teams want their highest-paid players performing at their peak. The 1-year deal limits the Houston Rockets' downside — if the fit doesn't work, they'll have cap flexibility soon.
Josh Okogie earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA shooting guards this season. Through 483 games, Josh is contributing 4.8 points, 2.6 rebounds, and 0.8 assists per game in his role. Josh's best relative area is FG% at 43.2, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.8 (shooting guard median: 4.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Josh ranks 101st.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.9 |
| 0.2 |
| 43.2% |
| 39.9% |
| 57.4% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 40 | 7.1 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 44.3% | 34.8% | 74.1% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 4 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 55.6% | 33.3% | 50.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 10 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 37.8% | 14.3% | 84.6% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 59 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 40.2% | 26.9% | 76.9% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 62 | 8.6 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 42.7% | 26.6% | 79.6% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 74 | 7.7 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 38.6% | 27.9% | 72.8% |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 3-6 |
| 1-4 |
| +3 |
| Mon, 4/27 | vs LAL | W 115-96 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-2 | +20 |
| Sat, 4/25 | vs LAL | L 108-112 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | -13 |
| Wed, 4/22 | @ LAL | L 94-101 | 24 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-3 | -4 |
| Sun, 4/19 | @ LAL | L 98-107 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 | -10 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs MEM | W 132-101 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-6 | 1-3 | +21 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs MIN | L 132-136 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-3 | +1 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs PHI | W 113-102 | 21 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-2 | +4 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ PHX | W 119-105 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | -5 |
Josh Okogie's public perception has settled into cautiously neutral territory — a C sentiment grade that feels about right for a depth piece whose ceiling and floor are both well-understood by this point in his career. The narrative driving that grade is straightforward: coverage heading into this season framed him as a known defensive specialist on a modest one-year deal, a contract structure that signals role player rather than rotation cornerstone, and at least one outlet has flagged a shrinking role during the prior campaign as a legitimate concern on an increasingly crowded Rockets roster. That framing aligns uncomfortably well with his D+ performance grade — through 68 games in the 2025-26 season, Okogie is posting 4.8 points, 2.6 rebounds, and 0.8 assists per game, counting-stat lines that confirm his value is situational and defensive rather than systemic. There is a counter-narrative worth acknowledging: one analyst has characterized him as a low-key but meaningful contributor, suggesting the organization views his defensive versatility as a genuine asset off the bench — but that positive framing has lost ground recently, with the overall sentiment trend cooling from A down to C over the last 30 days. Now, with Houston sitting as the five-seed in the Western Conference at 52-30 and the playoffs already underway, the question of whether a 4.8-point-per-game bench piece belongs in a meaningful rotation becomes louder, not quieter. The bottom line is that Okogie occupies an uncomfortable middle space in the public conversation — respected enough for his defensive effort, but with a role that has demonstrably contracted and a production profile that gives fans little reason to push back against that trend.