
#0PG · San Antonio Spurs
Height
6'0"
Weight
185 lbs
Age
30
College
USC
Experience
6 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 325 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 40.6% | 37.8% | 74.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 38 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/29 | vs POR | W 114-95 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
| Sun, 4/26 | @ POR | W 114-93 | 2 | 2 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Jordan McLaughlin's one-year, $2.3M deal with San Antonio earns a solid C+ Contract Value Index (CVI) rating, reflecting smart risk management on a replacement-level asset. Despite his D+ performance grade, McLaughlin's minimal financial commitment makes this a defensible move for the Spurs' rebuild. At $2.3M AAV, San Antonio is paying below-average starter money for what amounts to veteran depth and mentorship in their backcourt rotation. The short-term nature of the deal provides maximum flexibility while McLaughlin's experience offers value as a steady hand for their young core. While his on-court production has been underwhelming, the Spurs aren't betting significant resources or years on upside that likely doesn't exist. This represents textbook low-risk, low-reward roster construction—exactly the type of deal rebuilding teams should pursue when filling out their depth charts. The C+ grade reflects a contract that won't hurt the franchise's financial flexibility while providing adequate insurance at the point guard position.
Jordan McLaughlin earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA point guards this season. Through 325 games, Jordan is contributing 2.0 points, 0.7 rebounds, and 0.9 assists per game in his role. Jordan's best relative area is FG% at 40.6, though it still falls below the point guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 2.0 (point guard median: 15.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Jordan ranks 62nd.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.4 |
| 0.1 |
| 40.6% |
| 43.2% |
| 80.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 46 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 43.1% | 41.3% | 77.3% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 22.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 5 | 6.2 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 70.6% | 57.1% | 75.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 51 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 41.3% | 35.9% | 76.7% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 30 | 7.6 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 48.9% | 38.2% | 66.7% |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 1-1 |
| 0-0 |
| +2 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs DEN | L 118-128 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | +5 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs DAL | W 139-120 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 | -2 |
| Thu, 4/9 | vs POR | W 112-101 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | +9 |
The public perception of Jordan McLaughlin sits at a C+ heading into the Spurs' playoff push — a quietly deflating arc for a veteran whose early-season narrative was genuinely warm. That goodwill was built on real things: beat reporters and Spurs coaching staff singled him out as an "extreme professional," his re-signing drew positive local coverage, and his injury clearance was framed as a clean return rather than a red flag. The problem is that his on-court production, reflected in a D+ performance grade, has struggled to sustain that goodwill — posting 2.0 PPG, 0.7 RPG, and 0.9 APG across 38 games in the 2025-26 season is the profile of a depth piece who exists on a playoff roster primarily as a calm presence in a young locker room, not as a genuine rotation contributor. The team's recent transactions — releasing Jeremy Sochan and Stanley Umude while adding Emanuel Miller and Mason Plumlee — signal a front office actively reshaping its depth chart, and that kind of roster churn tends to create narrative pressure on fringe contributors whose value is hard to quantify on a box score. With San Antonio sitting as the No. 2 seed in the West at 62-20 and the Finals weeks away, the spotlight is growing brighter, and McLaughlin's role as a low-drama insurance policy feels increasingly fragile when the margin for veteran depth pieces narrows in the playoffs. The bottom line: McLaughlin's narrative has cooled off considerably since training camp, and unless his defensive instincts and locker room credibility get a visible showcase moment, the C+ sentiment grade reflects a player whose reputation is holding on more than it's growing.