Jordan McLaughlin
#0PG · San Antonio Spurs
Fan Verdict
Grade this player:
Career StatsC-
| Year | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 325 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 44.2% | 37.8% | 74.4% |
| 2025-26 | 37 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 40.6% | 43.2% | 80.0% |
| 2024-25 | 46 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 43.1% | 41.3% | 77.3% |
| 2023-24 | 6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 22.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Current Contract
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Contract Value Index (CVI)
Jordan McLaughlin's contract with the San Antonio Spurs grades out as a fair market value contract, earning a C CVI grade. At $2.3M per year over 1 year, this is a minimum-level contract. Jordan's deal falls in the minimum-level tier for NBA Point Guards. At 29, Jordan still has productive years ahead, though the contract extends into the decline phase. This deal represents roughly fair market value — neither a steal nor an overpay. The deal will need consistent performance to grade out as a positive move long-term.
Performance Analysis
Jordan McLaughlin earns a C- Performance grade, reflecting average production for a Point Guard. Across 325 career games, Jordan has averaged 3.8 points, 1.4 rebounds, and 2.6 assists per game. Jordan's strongest metric is FG% at 4424.4, compared to the NBA Point Guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for improvement is PPG at 3.8, below the Point Guard median of 15.0. Among 93 NBA Point Guards graded this season, Jordan ranks 85th in overall performance. Jordan will need to elevate key areas of the game to justify a larger role with the San Antonio Spurs.
Current Sentiment
McLaughlin is viewed as a solid backup earning early-season opportunities despite injury concerns affecting consistency. His recent performances show promise, with media noting his impact in limited minutes against Indiana. The $2.3M contract appears reasonable for a depth piece, though not an obvious long-term solution. Health and availability represent the dominant narrative—frequent questionable designations overshadow positive on-court contributions significantly. Fan sentiment remains cautiously optimistic but tempered by durability questions and his C-minus grade baseline.
Transaction History
No transactions found for this player.