
#00SG · New York Knicks
Height
6'5"
Weight
194 lbs
Age
33
College
Missouri
Experience
11 yrs
Wingspan
6'8.0"
Reach
8'2.0"
Hand Size
8.25" × 9"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 814 | 9.0 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 44.9% | 33.6% | 82.8% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 63 | 9.0 | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 5/5 | vs PHI | W 137-98 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | +11 |
| Thu, 4/30 | @ ATL | W 140-89 | 11 | 7 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$12.9M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$12.9M/yr
Jordan Clarkson's contract with the New York Knicks is graded as a D+ CVI. At $12.9M per year, the team is currently paying more than the on-court production warrants — a gap that needs to close for this deal to work out. Jordan's current production grades out in the middle of the pack among NBA shooting guards. His $12.9M average annual value ranks as role player money for the shooting guard market. The concern here is the gap between production and cost — the team is paying a premium above the player's on-court value. At 33, Jordan is on the back end of his prime — the contract value depends on how well he maintains production as age-related decline typically accelerates. The 1-year deal limits the New York Knicks' downside — if the fit doesn't work, they'll have cap flexibility soon.
Jordan Clarkson earns a C+ Performance grade, reflecting league-average production for a shooting guard. Through 814 games, Jordan is contributing 9.0 points, 1.7 rebounds, and 1.4 assists per game in his role. Jordan's best relative area is FG% at 44.9, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 1.7 (shooting guard median: 5.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Jordan ranks 46th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.4 |
| 0.1 |
| 44.9% |
| 33.7% |
| 81.6% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 37 | 16.2 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 40.8% | 36.2% | 79.7% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 55 | 17.1 | 3.4 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 41.3% | 29.4% | 88.1% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 61 | 20.8 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 44.4% | 33.8% | 81.6% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 6 | 17.5 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 54.8% | 37.5% | 88.9% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 11 | 17.5 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 40.6% | 35.1% | 96.2% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 7 | 16.7 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 46.4% | 34.7% | 100.0% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 81 | 16.8 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 44.8% | 32.4% | 84.4% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 19 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 30.1% | 23.9% | 83.3% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 82 | 14.7 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 44.5% | 32.9% | 79.8% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 79 | 15.5 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 43.3% | 34.7% | 80.4% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 59 | 11.9 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 44.8% | 31.4% | 82.9% |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 2-4 |
| 0-1 |
| +22 |
| Wed, 4/29 | vs ATL | W 126-97 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-1 | +14 |
| Sat, 4/25 | @ ATL | W 114-98 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | +12 |
| Thu, 4/23 | @ ATL | L 108-109 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-11 | 0-2 | +1 |
| Tue, 4/21 | vs ATL | L 106-107 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-1 | -5 |
| Sat, 4/18 | vs ATL | W 113-102 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | +9 |
| Sun, 4/12 | vs CHA | L 96-110 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-1 | -1 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs TOR | W 112-95 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-1 | +3 |
| Thu, 4/9 | vs BOS | W 112-106 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-1 | +4 |
Jordan Clarkson is riding one of the more striking sentiment surges of the Knicks' playoff push, with public perception sitting at an A+ — a level of goodwill that reflects something well beyond routine appreciation for a bench contributor. The narrative engine here is a genuine revival story: his 27-point performance against his former Utah Jazz squad on March 11, 2026, functioned as a marquee moment that crystallized his scoring credibility in New York, and coverage has consistently framed his patience through an early-season role adjustment as a character trait worth celebrating rather than a footnote. Beat reporters have leaned into the leadership angle, pairing his Sixth Man of the Year pedigree from 2021 with his veteran presence alongside Mitchell Robinson as evidence that his value extends beyond box scores. The honest tension, though, is that his A+ sentiment grade sits well above his C+ performance grade — in the 2025-26 season across 63 games, he's averaging 9.0 PPG, 1.7 RPG, and 1.4 APG, numbers that read as solid role-player production but don't independently justify elite-tier public enthusiasm. The recent additions of Jose Alvarado via trade and Jeremy Sochan via signing have actually reinforced his standing rather than threatened it, with coverage framing Clarkson and Alvarado together as the bench infrastructure keeping New York functional deep into the playoff run. The bottom line is that the narrative around Clarkson has outpaced the production — but in playoff basketball, goodwill built on role clarity, veteran composure, and a signature scoring night is a real currency, and right now he's spending it well.