
#00C · Milwaukee Bucks
Height
6'10"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
27
College
Texas
Experience
4 yrs
Wingspan
7'3.3"
Reach
8'10.0"
Hand Size
9" × 9.75"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 258 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 78.4% | 0.0% | 60.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 67 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 1.6 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 4/12 | @ PHI | L 106-126 | 31 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7-9 | 0-0 | -19 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs BKN | W 125-108 | 30 | 11 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$5.3M
Guaranteed
$2.5M
AAV
$2.5M/yr
Jericho Sims has delivered exceptional contract value for the Milwaukee Bucks despite posting a D- performance grade, earning an elite A+ Contract Value Index (CVI) rating on his modest $2.5M AAV deal. The center's bargain-basement salary creates massive value potential even with below-average production, as his contract represents minimal financial risk while providing crucial frontcourt depth. At just $2.5M annually, Sims costs roughly one-sixth of what replacement-level centers typically command in today's inflated market, making his deal a textbook example of how strategic low-cost signings can generate outsized CVI returns. While his on-court impact remains limited, the Bucks have secured a legitimate NBA rotation piece at a price point that allows maximum roster flexibility and creates enormous upside if Sims develops further. This contract structure exemplifies smart front office management — even middling production at this salary level translates to franchise-caliber value, demonstrating why teams increasingly prioritize cost-controlled depth over expensive mediocrity.
Jericho Sims earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 258 games, Jericho is contributing 5.0 points, 5.5 rebounds, and 1.6 assists per game in his role. Jericho's strongest area is FG% at 78.4, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 5.0 (center median: 15.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Jericho ranks 93rd.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.3 |
| 0.3 |
| 78.4% |
| 0.0% |
| 62.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 53 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 63.4% | 0.0% | 61.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 45 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 69.1% | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 52 | 3.4 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 77.6% | 0.0% | 75.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 41 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 72.2% | 0.0% | 41.4% |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 4-4 |
| 0-0 |
| -7 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ DET | L 111-137 | 39 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-0 | -20 |
| Tue, 4/7 | @ BKN | L 90-96 | 37 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-0 | +7 |
| Sun, 4/5 | vs MEM | W 131-115 | 26 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6-7 | 0-0 | +19 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs BOS | L 101-133 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | +3 |
Jericho Sims sits in murky middle ground with the Milwaukee fanbase right now — public perception is tepid at best, landing at a C sentiment grade that reflects genuine ambivalence rather than any strong conviction in either direction. The driving narrative has an interesting split: at least one prominent outlet has framed Sims as a center quietly breaking out, crediting the Bucks for recognizing value others overlooked, yet the broader media conversation remains firmly in role-player territory, treating him as a depth piece rather than a meaningful rotation anchor. That cautious optimism runs directly into a D- performance grade, which makes the disconnect hard to ignore — whatever upside observers are projecting has not translated into sustained on-court impact that moves the needle for a team sitting at 32-50 and well outside playoff contention. His 2025-26 numbers — 5.0 PPG, 5.5 RPG, and 1.6 APG across 67 games — describe a serviceable backup center capable of filling specific roles, but they do not build a compelling case for expanded minutes or a bigger off-season contract, and the comparative fan polling of Sims versus other center options suggests the fan base itself is unconvinced he is the answer. Milwaukee's recent roster churn — multiple cuts and a rest-of-season signing — only adds to the instability framing around Sims, with questions about roster direction looming large as the season winds down. The bottom line: Sims is a player earning modest goodwill from a niche set of observers who believe his rim-finishing efficiency and rebounding are undervalued, but the broader narrative is shaped by a struggling team, a performance grade that tells a sobering story, and end-of-season reviews that read more like eulogies than endorsements.