
#32PF · Houston Rockets
Height
6'8"
Weight
235 lbs
Age
39
College
Georgetown
Experience
17 yrs
Wingspan
7'1.3"
Reach
8'7.0"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1243 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 40.7% | 33.8% | 80.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 26 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/27 | vs LAL | W 115-96 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -4 |
| Sat, 4/25 | vs LAL | L 108-112 | 8 | 0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Jeff Green's one-year, $2.3M deal with the Houston Rockets earns a solid C on the Contract Value Index (CVI), representing a reasonable low-risk gamble on veteran experience. Despite his D+ performance grade reflecting diminished production at age 37, Green's bargain-bin contract minimizes financial exposure while providing Houston with a proven NBA body who can fill minutes across multiple frontcourt positions. The $2.3M annual value sits well below replacement-level starter money, creating a scenario where even middling contributions would justify the investment for a rebuilding franchise prioritizing flexibility. Green's extensive playoff experience and locker room presence add intangible value that doesn't show up in traditional metrics, making this the type of low-cost veteran signing that rarely backfires financially. While his on-court impact may be limited, the Rockets structured this deal perfectly to extract maximum value from a declining but still functional role player, illustrating smart roster construction at the margins.
Jeff Green earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 1243 games, Jeff is contributing 2.3 points, 0.7 rebounds, and 0.2 assists per game in his role. Jeff's best relative area is FG% at 40.7, though it still falls below the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.2 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Jeff ranks 51st.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.0 |
| 0.0 |
| 40.7% |
| 32.4% |
| 100.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 78 | 6.5 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 45.6% | 33.1% | 81.9% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 20 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 45.2% | 32.1% | 89.5% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 5 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 35.3% | 37.5% | 80.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 6 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 48.5% | 55.6% | 87.5% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 12 | 11.6 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 49.5% | 42.6% | 82.4% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 77 | 12.3 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 47.5% | 34.7% | 88.8% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 22 | 7.7 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 40.8% | 30.0% | 71.7% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 69 | 9.2 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 39.4% | 27.5% | 86.3% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 6 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 45.7% | 40.0% | 60.0% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 11 | 8.9 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 33.3% | 22.2% | 84.6% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 82 | 16.9 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 41.2% | 34.1% | 79.5% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 6 | 20.3 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 43.5% | 45.5% | 84.4% |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 9 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 43.4% | 43.8% | 72.2% |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 6 | 11.8 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 32.9% | 29.6% | 85.0% |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 78 | 16.5 | 6.7 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 44.6% | 38.9% | 78.8% |
| 2007-08 | ![]() | 80 | 10.5 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 42.7% | 27.6% | 74.4% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-2 |
| 0-1 |
| -4 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs MEM | W 132-101 | 24 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-4 | +7 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ PHX | W 119-105 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
The public narrative around Jeff Green sits at a C sentiment grade — quietly respectful but increasingly muted as the Rockets push deeper into a playoff run as the fifth seed in the Western Conference. The dominant media frame is genuinely warm toward Green: analysts have formally ranked him as the second-best journeyman in NBA history, a designation that carries real weight and speaks to 18 seasons of professional staying power, adaptability, and locker-room credibility across an extraordinary number of stops. His public declaration that he wants to retire in Houston and suit up for at least two more seasons has resonated with the fanbase, casting him as a loyal, team-first presence rather than a mercenary chasing a ring — exactly the kind of story that plays well on a young, ascending roster. The problem is that sentiment and production are drifting in opposite directions: his D+ performance grade reflects a 2025-26 season in which he is averaging just 2.3 points and 0.7 rebounds over 26 games, numbers that make it difficult to argue for meaningful playoff minutes when games matter most. His recent retreat to the bench reinforces that the Rockets are prioritizing younger talent down the stretch, which is a rational organizational decision but one that quietly chips away at his relevance within the rotation. Nothing about his situation feels contentious — no controversy, no criticism of character — but the cooling sentiment trend from B to C over the last 30 days reflects the reality that a beloved journeyman with limited on-court impact becomes harder to celebrate when a franchise is fighting for its postseason life. The bottom line: Green's narrative is one of earned respect running headlong into diminishing opportunity, and without a meaningful uptick in playing time, the sentiment trajectory will likely continue drifting downward as the Finals window approaches.