
#2PF · Los Angeles Lakers
Height
6'8"
Weight
214 lbs
Age
27
College
Kentucky
Experience
7 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 364 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 46.2% | 29.3% | 63.8% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 56 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 1.3 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 5/6 | @ OKC | L 90-108 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | -4 |
| Thu, 4/30 | vs HOU | L 93-99 | 6 | 2 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$37.3M
Guaranteed
$24.0M
AAV
$11.6M/yr
Jarred Vanderbilt's 3-year, $11.6M AAV deal with the Lakers represents one of the worst contract values in the NBA based on his Contract Value Index (CVI) analysis. Despite being positioned as a versatile forward who could provide defensive versatility and rebounding, Vanderbilt has delivered replacement-level production that falls dramatically short of his salary expectations. At nearly $12M per season, the Lakers are paying starter money for a player whose on-court impact has been minimal, with his defensive contributions failing to offset significant limitations on the offensive end. The contract becomes even more problematic when considering Vanderbilt's injury history and inconsistent availability, making him an unreliable asset despite his substantial cap hit. While his athleticism and defensive potential initially justified the investment, the reality is that Vanderbilt has become a costly bench piece who struggles to provide meaningful minutes in crucial situations. This represents a clear salary-to-production mismatch that hamstrings the Lakers' flexibility while delivering minimal return on investment.
Jarred Vanderbilt earns a D Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 364 games, Jarred is contributing 4.5 points, 4.6 rebounds, and 1.3 assists per game in his role. Jarred's strongest area is FG% at 46.2, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 4.5 (power forward median: 15.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Jarred ranks 69th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.8 |
| 0.3 |
| 46.2% |
| 29.9% |
| 63.8% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 5 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 75.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 29 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 51.8% | 29.6% | 66.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 15 | 4.6 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 40.0% | 24.1% | 70.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 6 | 5.5 | 7.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 48.1% | 0.0% | 70.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 64 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 60.6% | 20.0% | 55.9% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 11 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 62.5% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 1-3 |
| 0-1 |
| -8 |
| Mon, 4/27 | @ HOU | L 96-115 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-1 | -1 |
| Sat, 4/25 | @ HOU | W 112-108 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-2 | +6 |
| Wed, 4/22 | vs HOU | W 101-94 | 14 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | +8 |
| Sun, 4/19 | vs HOU | W 107-98 | 18 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | +4 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs UTA | W 131-107 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 | +5 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs PHX | W 101-73 | 19 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-2 | +6 |
| Fri, 4/10 | @ GSW | W 119-103 | 26 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | +15 |
Jarred Vanderbilt's public standing with the Lakers sits at a D, and the current narrative offers little reason for optimism heading deeper into the 2026 playoffs. The dominant storyline driving that perception is his removal from the rotation — a particularly brutal development for a player whose entire value proposition is built on defensive versatility and rebounding rather than any offensive creation, leaving him without the fallback that a more offensively capable player might lean on when minutes dry up. That storyline tracks cleanly with his performance grade, also a D, and his 2025-26 numbers — 4.5 PPG, 4.6 RPG, and 1.3 APG across 56 games — confirm a player who was already operating in a limited capacity before his recent right pinky dislocation effectively shelved him during the most critical stretch of the season. The injury, which drew visible reactions from opposing players on the bench and generated a wave of coverage framing it as a gruesome setback, has only compounded the sense that Vanderbilt's playoff window with this team is effectively closed for now. Recent roster moves — picking up Luke Kennard via trade and re-signing Nick Smith Jr. — suggest the organization is actively building out its perimeter depth in ways that don't directly create a path back to relevance for a defense-first big. At 27, with eight seasons in the league, Vanderbilt still carries the profile of an established veteran who can contribute when healthy and deployed correctly, but right now the narrative around him is one of absence, uncertainty, and a role that was already diminishing before the injury made things worse.