
#55C · Oklahoma City Thunder
Height
7'0"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
28
Experience
7 yrs
Grade Isaiah Hartenstein
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Isaiah Hartenstein grades out as an excellent C for Oklahoma City Thunder (A Impact). That places him 13th of 97 graded centers. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it good value (B-), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 426 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 62.2% | 23.9% | 67.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 47 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 3.5 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 47 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 3.5 | 62.2% | B B |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 57 | 11.2 | 10.7 | 3.8 | 58.1% | B B |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 75 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 2.5 | 64.4% | B- B- |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 82 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 53.5% | D+ D+ |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 68 | 8.3 | 4.9 | 2.4 | 62.6% | C+ C+ |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 46 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 55.0% | D D |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 23 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 65.7% | D D |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 28 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 48.8% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 5/31 | vs SAS | L 103-111 | 21 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-7 | 0-0 | -14 |
| Fri, 5/29 | @ SAS | L 91-118 | 16 | 10 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$57.0M
Guaranteed
$57.0M
AAV
$28.5M/yr
Isaiah Hartenstein's contract with the Oklahoma City Thunder grades as a B- CVI — the team is getting good return on this investment relative to other centers around the league. Isaiah's production is solid — comfortably above the league-average center threshold. His $28.5M average annual value ranks as mid-tier money for the center market. The production-to-cost ratio is favorable — solid output at a reasonable price point represents good asset management. At 28, Isaiah is in his prime productive window — exactly when teams want their highest-paid players performing at their peak. The 2-year deal keeps the commitment short, giving the team financial flexibility to move on if performance drops.
Isaiah Hartenstein earns a B+ Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level center putting up solid numbers for the Oklahoma City Thunder. Through 426 games, Isaiah is contributing 9.2 points, 9.4 rebounds, and 3.5 assists per game in his role. Isaiah's strongest area is RPG at 9.4, which compares favorably to the center median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 9.2 (center median: 15.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Isaiah ranks 13th. Isaiah is a reliable contributor who the Oklahoma City Thunder can count on game to game.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Isaiah's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Isaiah Hartenstein ranks 13th of 97 graded centers by performance. That slots Isaiah between Bam Adebayo (B+) just ahead and Mark Williams (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Bam AdebayoMiami HeatB+Robert Williams IIIPortland Trail BlazersB+Jakob PoeltlToronto RaptorsB+Graded lower
Mark WilliamsPhoenix SunsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Isaiah Hartenstein is a player in his 7th NBA season listed at C for the Oklahoma City Thunder. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Isaiah Hartenstein, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance B+, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 1.0 |
| 0.8 |
| 62.2% |
| 0.0% |
| 61.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 57 | 11.2 | 10.7 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 58.1% | 0.0% | 67.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 75 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 64.4% | 33.3% | 70.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 82 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 53.5% | 21.6% | 67.6% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 68 | 8.3 | 4.9 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 62.6% | 46.7% | 68.9% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 46 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 55.0% | 33.3% | 64.8% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 23 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 65.7% | 0.0% | 67.9% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 28 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 48.8% | 33.3% | 78.6% |
| 5 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 5-10 |
| 0-0 |
| -25 |
| Wed, 5/27 | vs SAS | W 127-114 | 31 | 12 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-0 | +24 |
| Mon, 5/25 | @ SAS | L 82-103 | 18 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6-11 | 0-0 | -16 |
| Sat, 5/23 | @ SAS | W 123-108 | 21 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | -6 |
| Thu, 5/21 | vs SAS | W 122-113 | 27 | 10 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-0 | +2 |
| Tue, 5/19 | vs SAS | L 115-122 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | +2 |
| Tue, 5/12 | @ LAL | W 115-110 | 28 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | +30 |
| Sun, 5/10 | @ LAL | W 131-108 | 31 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6-7 | 0-0 | +26 |
| Fri, 5/8 | vs LAL | W 125-107 | 27 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-6 | 0-0 | +1 |
Recent headlines push Isaiah Hartenstein's sentiment grade to a B+, with Oklahoma City's broader season shaping the read. The Thunder's explicit organizational commitment to keeping him in the fold—reportedly willing to move significant assets specifically to preserve his roster spot—has reframed Hartenstein from depth-piece filler to culture-fit cornerstone, a conviction reflected in warm, humanizing media coverage anchored by a featured documentary segment that has elevated his profile within one of the NBA's most compelling young franchises. His 2025-26 production of 9.2 PPG, 9.4 RPG, and 3.5 APG across 47 games aligns cleanly with the analytical media's narrative: unglamorous but efficient interior defense and ball movement that validates his role alongside Chet Holmgren rather than demanding headline-grabbing volume, a profile that winning-focused coverage has learned to prize. The Thunder's decision to rest both Hartenstein and Holmgren ahead of the playoffs signals protected status rather than rotation depth, while Oklahoma City's position as the No. 1 seed in the West with the Finals 38 days away creates genuine stakes for a deep postseason run to cement his standing in the elite-role-player conversation. Sentiment sits in an ascending phase: organizational conviction is explicit and verifiable, media affection is warm and documentary-elevated, production is steady, and the timing of the playoffs could validate every bit of confidence the Thunder have invested in his roster construction.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.